Less than two months ago, this Board endorsed Virginia Sapiro for the position of University of Wisconsin provost. It was then, and is now, our firm belief that Ms. Sapiro is the most sensible candidate for the high office.
However, Chancellor John Wiley, citing a fundamental support for the shared governance process, has indicated to this Board that he will respect the list offered to him by the search and screen committee and choose between UW Dean Patrick Farrell and Georgia Institute of Technology Dean Sue Rosser. It is regrettable that a largely incompetent search and screen committee has managed to tie the chancellor's hands as such, but this is the reality we face today.
Understanding the field to be limited to these two candidates, we endorse Mr. Farrell.
A competent dean known for his intellect and generally respected by his peers, Mr. Farrell will ably occupy the second highest office at UW with a brand of dignity and professionalism this school deserves. He has both a bachelor's and doctoral degree from the University of Michigan, a master's from the University of California–Berkeley and a solid administrative record that includes his current work within UW's School of Engineering.
Mr. Farrell stands in stark contrast to the attributes of Ms. Rosser, a fringe feminist whose ideology could further embattle Bascom Hall's already-sullied reputation.
The Georgia Tech administrator has openly advocated for single-sex classrooms in higher education — a notion perhaps best relegated to the early 20th century — and sought to further various other gender-based policies that universally treat the sexes as fundamentally different within an education context. She seeks to draw vast contrasts between men and women seeking a higher education, and in the year 2006 such is a dichotomy that any civilized university ought to reject.
Indeed, in stating the qualifications of Mr. Farrell for this weighty job, it must be recognized that one of the many reasons he ought to receive this promotion is simply because he is not Ms. Rosser.
To be sure, this is not a contest between two suitable individuals — Mr. Farrell is as qualified as Ms. Rosser is troubling. And given the extraordinary nature of those qualities, Mr. Wiley's forthcoming decision ought to be a relatively simple one.
