Independent Student Newspaper Since 1969

The Badger Herald

Independent Student Newspaper Since 1969

The Badger Herald

Independent Student Newspaper Since 1969

The Badger Herald


Best and Worst: Super Bowl Commercials

The best: #1 Ram – Farmer


The best: #2 Samsung Mobile USA – The Next Big Thing

The best: #3 Taco Bell – Viva Young

The worst: #1 Go Daddy – Perfect Match

This year’s Super Bowl commercials were once again comprised of what TV viewers love most:
celebrities, beer and talking babies. While the familiar blockbuster trailers and slapstick comedy
ads filled much of the event’s airtime, several commercials stood out as original and entertaining. Others simply fell flat.

Best Commercials

  1. Ram – “Farmer” – Ram trucks are known and commonly advertised as a tough man’s vehicle, tool and partner.
    However, Ram’s “Farmer” ad took the brand one step further. The commercial stood
    apart from every other Super Bowl ad by taking a stern, slow-paced tone that glorifies the
    hardworking, honest life of a farmer. Customary Super Bowl ads are accompanied with
    cheap laughs and a vague association to the brand or product, but “Farmer” appeals to the
    heartland of America. The gritty and heartfelt monologue by the late radio legend Paul Harvey is accompanied
    by powerful yet simple imagery that perfectly aligns with the Ram brand. The ad inspires a
    sense of passion and human decency viewers may wish to aspire to, which leaves them with an overwhelmingly positive association with Ram.

  2. Samsung Mobile USA – “The Next Big Thing” – Samsung’s “The Next Big Thing” ad shows just how far star power can take a Super Bowl
    commercial. Paul Rudd (“This is 40”), Seth Rogen (“The Guilt Trip”), Bob Odenkirk
    (“Breaking Bad”) and Lebron James star in an ad that shows functionality of a product, creates positive associations with a brand and even pokes fun at competing ads. Samsung does not
    go overboard to elicit laughs, but instead uses a comedic, movie-like encounter between
    lovable actors to woo the audience. The true genius of this commercial is the storyline of
    the ad revolves around the brainstorming process for Samsung’s Super Bowl ad. Meanwhile,
    Rudd, Rogen, Odenkirk and James make fun of the typical advertising antics we see each
    year, putting Samsung ahead of the competition.

  3. Taco Bell – “Viva Young” – Taco Bell’s “Viva Young” provides this year’s laughable, prototypical commercial. While
    the far-fetched style of the commercial is not entirely original, the content provides the witty
    and adventurous tone for which Taco Bell is known. The juxtaposition of elderly retirement
    home breakouts set to a version of the hit song “We Are Young” by Fun. provides a clever
    twist to common perceptions of a night on the town. Taco Bell’s commercial even mirrors
    the slow motion debauchery in Fun.’s music video. This ad successfully caters to the carefree,
    forever-young mentality in all of us.

Worst Commercials

  1. Go Daddy – “Perfect Match” – It’s no surprise Go Daddy opted for attractive women to take center stage for their
    Super Bowl ad. Sprint Cup driver Danica Patrick is the habitual spokeswoman for the
    website domain name company, and scantily clad women are commonly featured in Go
    Daddy commercials. However, this year’s “Perfect Match” ad fell short of both humor and
    attraction. The extended kiss between model Bar Refaeli and a nerdy tech guy named Walter
    was supposed to characterize the seamless unity between Go Daddy’s smart and sexy sides, but
    instead it shows an awkward disconnect between the two. The long, uncomfortable make-out
    session accompanied by an extreme close up shot brings out a larger sense of confusion than
    a desire to visit Go Daddy’s website.

  2. Lincoln MKZ – “Phoenix” –  Lincoln’s commercial for the MKZ was the biggest snoozer out of all the Super Bowl ads.
    Although some commercials fell short of humor or general interest, Lincoln’s ad lacks any
    sense of originality. At least the other car companies tried. In the commercial, the MKZ is
    shown cruising on open roads with the estimated MPG appearing on the screen while the
    narrator explains the sedan is new and different. This commercial resembles virtually
    every other car commercial shown on a daily basis, not a multi-million-dollar Super Bowl
    ad. The ad does evoke a certain laid-back sense of luxury, but more so, it reveals a substantial
    lack of creativity. The narrator insists, “[i]t’s not what you think,” but the commercial
    shows it is exactly what you think.

  3. Sketchers – “Man vs. Cheetah” –  Sketchers’ “Man vs. Cheetah” ad falls into this year’s pile of commercials that tried to be
    funny, but blatantly failed to do so. Sketchers was clearly going for laughs, but the ad merely
    came off as corny. As if showing a man running down a cheetah as a result of Sketchers
    running shoes is not used and tired as is, the shot of the runner catching up to the cheetah
    looked painfully unrealistic. While Sketchers probably did this intentionally for laughs,
    it did not come off as humorous, yet it commented on Sketchers’ functionality. This ad
    unintentionally portrays Sketchers as a somewhat childish brand while leaving questions
    about the actual performance of the running shoe.

Leave a Comment
Donate to The Badger Herald

Your donation will support the student journalists of University of Wisconsin-Madison. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to The Badger Herald

Comments (0)

All The Badger Herald Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *