As a graduating senior, I have not paid as much attention to the Initiative for Undergraduates as I perhaps should have. However, Chancellor Martin’s last e-mail compelled me to look more closely at the plan that is being proposed, and I was somewhat surprised by the similarity to the Growth and Access Agenda proposed by UW-La Crosse in 2007. The agenda proposed a differential tuition scheme, part of which would be used to provide financial aid to students from low-income families with the hope of increasing diversity on campus. Similar to the Madison plan, there were extreme efforts made to educate the student population and gain their input on the plan. A campuswide survey showed a 65 percent approval from students for the plan, and the student senate voted nearly unanimously to approve it as well. Even with the wide student support and enthusiasm, legislators would not approve the plan, saying they were uncomfortable with using student tuition to fund others’ financial aid

Before coming to Madison, I was a student on the UW-La Crosse campus for three years, and I understand firsthand the drastic differences between a small campus and a larger campus of Madison‘s size. While I have enjoyed being a student at Madison and am thankful for all the opportunities it has afforded me, I believe the sense of community fostered by UW-La Crosse is far more developed than that of UW-Madison. I was a strong supporter of La Crosse‘s Growth and Access Agenda and still believe all La Crosse students would benefit from the increased campus diversity that would have accompanied it. However, I do not believe that students on the Madison campus will benefit from the proposed Madison Initiative financial aid plan. Rather than enhancing the student experience, the Madison plan merely reallocates the burden of university funding to students with parents above a certain income level. There is a budget shortfall that needs to be met, and students’ tuitions should play a role in that, but it is a responsibility that should be distributed equally among all students of Madison. Unless it can be demonstrated students paying higher tuition rates are receiving benefits from the initiative beyond simply meeting the university’s funding requirements, I cannot support this plan. It is my hope that all those involved in making this decision think critically about the proposal and reconsider the differential tuition and financial aid sections of the plan.

Sarah Witmer

Senior, mechanical engineering

[email protected]