Sometimes the process is more important than the outcome. Turns out this time, we don't have to choose.
On Monday night, the Student Judiciary handed down another strike against the credibility of the Student Services Finance Committee. In a nearly unanimous decision on all points, SJ found that three members of SSFC — Chair Jennifer Knox and Reps. Lorenzo Edwards and Kellie Sanders — were in violation of the viewpoint-neutrality clause, with Rep. Sanders found to be in malicious violation, resulting in her removal from the finance committee and the reversal of SSFC's decision to minimally fund Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow. Justice Josh Tyack concurred with most of the opinion, but disagreed with the majority when it came to the severity of Rep. Sanders' violation.
We not only applaud this ruling, we are encouraged to see that the Student Judiciary has once again protected the rights of students in the nebulous world of segregated-fee funding.
Since the first hearings this academic year, SSFC has shown little in the way of consistency, save for their consistent reckless disregard for process and neutrality. With their ruling in favor of the UW Roman Catholic Foundation and now CFACT, the Student Judiciary has pointed out the obvious absurdity that is SSFC.
Interestingly, ASM bylaws call for the removal of any member that accumulates two non-malicious viewpoint violations. Since both the UWRCF and CFACT cases were brought against the whole of SSFC, each member now has two such violations.
Student Judiciary noticed the same facts, but rightly declared the bylaw unconstitutional. Such broad strokes lead to nothing more than guilt by association.
However, bylaws also allow ASM to consider impeachment for individual members. Looking at the state of the committee these past few months and not trusting in SSFC's power to self-regulate, we strongly urge ASM to consider censure and, if necessary, impeachment of any SSFC member that has shown viewpoint violations.
In a time when the credibility of the not just SSFC but ASM as well is being continually called into question, it is time for our elected members to inject some much-needed integrity into student government.
