Sports: Column

Solochek: Money can’t buy championships

The economy is down, unemployment is at a 16-year high and hundreds of thousands of Americans are wondering how they are going to scrape by if a fix does not come soon.

But the New York Yankees were still able to spend $423.5 million on signing free agents CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and their newest addition, first baseman Mark Teixeira. By any standard, that is a lot of cash, but it is especially amazing in the hard economic times.

Not only have the Bronx Bombers invested piles of money into three players, but they are the only ones in our nation who can actually afford real estate. This spring, the Yankees will open their $1.6 billion “House That George Built,” the new Yankee Stadium, across the street in an exhibition game against the Chicago Cubs at the beginning of April. The stadium is the second most expensive in the world, after Wembley Stadium in England.

To put the cost of the three free agents into perspective, that is higher than the gross domestic product of 10 nations in 2007, according to the World Bank. To go further into the numbers, last year, Sabathia had 151 strikeouts. If he puts up similar numbers this year, compared to the $23 million he will be making each year, he will earn $151,317.88 per strikeout. Not a bad day if you get about 10 K’s per game.

With the money the Yankees are paying their big off-season signees, there are a lot more things they could do than almost double the GDP of Tonga. For example, you could pay out-of-state tuition and the segregated fees (a total of $11,354.20) for about 37,299 students for each semester. Or they could buy 423,500,000 double cheeseburgers off the McDonald’s Dollar Menu, which I am sure Sabathia would enjoy.

While the money the Yankees spent on their top-three free agents could pay my rent for about the next 56,791 years (not including inflation, of course), there are some things an absurd amount of money can’t buy. For example, a championship.

Last year, the Yankees had the largest salary in Major League Baseball, dishing out $209,081,579. However, the team that paid its players the largest amount of money, the Bronx Bombers, still only managed to win eight fewer games than the team with the second smallest payroll, the Tampa Bay Rays, who won the American League East Division.

During the 2008 MLB season, five of the top 10 teams in total payroll failed to make the playoffs, including the Yankees, Tigers, Mets, Mariners and Braves. The year before, only four of the top 10 teams in total payroll made the playoffs, while two of the bottom 10 — the Diamondbacks and the Rockies — advanced to the National League Championship Series.

While it seems spending a lot of money annually on big name free agents is one way to put a winning team together, the other option is to go with the “Moneyball” approach. This means looking for quality players with lower salaries or relying on “homegrown” talent.

The spend-less-for-more approach has seen its success, particularly with this year’s Rays, who made it to the World Series with a median salary of just $414,650. However, teams like the Kansas City Royals, who perennially have a low salary, continue to remain at the bottom of the American League Central.

If the MLB is looking for some kind of parity in payrolls and possibly evening up the play of clubs across the board, there needs to be some kind of salary cap. I know Yankees fans will always argue people want to institute a cap because of jealousy for what the Yankees can afford. But, looking at other leagues that have instituted a cap, the parity between the teams has greatly increased, as has interest for the games.

Giving stars that kind of money not only decreases the parity in the leagues, but it also harms teams in the future in terms of the money their aces or stars can demand once they reach free agency. This fact particularly hurt the Brewers this off-season when they tried to re-sign Sabathia but could not afford him.

While Opening Day is still months away, all eyes will be on the Yankees to not only see if their investment was worth it but also to see if the spending spree is going to continue. But, whatever the outcome may be, we will see if money can actually buy a championship.

Either way, I am sure the Yankees could afford to fly about 1,032,926 of us ($410 per flight from Madison to Newark on Continental Airlines on Continental.com) out to New York to see the Cubs take on the Bronx Bombers for the opening of the new stadium.

Ben Solochek is a senior majoring in history and journalism. If you think of anything else the Yankees could afford, e-mail him at bsolochek@badgerherald.com.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

user-pic

Ben, I think you need to hone your research skills. Please start by counting how many NBA teams have been in the Finals the last 10 years vs. how many baseball teams have been in the World Series. If after doing that you are still comfortable making that statement about parity increasing with the existence of a cap, then I have some real estate in West Africa that might interest you.

user-pic

Ben, Rehashed article. Hope this wasn’t for a grade, or if it was, that you turned this in a few weeks ago. For starters (no pun intended) the Yankees didn’t spend $420M on those players. To date, I don’t think any money has been spent (on salary at least…I’m sure somebody paid for those jerseys and medical exams). Don’t you think there is a little bit of intellectual dishonesty there? When you get your first job, you’re not going to say ‘my boss agreed to pay me $140,000’ are you? No. You’re going to say ‘I just got a job paying $20,000…and with the NYT filing for bankruptcy, I’m glad to have it.’ While it would be nice if the Yankees could buy Tonga, I’m sure there is no business value in doing so—although I could be wrong, and if I am, I’m confident Hal will step in with an offer that only he can (and will) outbid. However, I do appreciate your stunning explanation of the luxury tax, the profits and losses of the Royals and Pirates, and how the Yankees, unlike um…almost ever other team in baseball, is paying for its own stadium.

Please take Intro to Business and Intro to Economics or you’ll just end up teaching history the same way you learned it…poorly.

timrandlerv10@yahoo.com

user-pic

I think that you are definitely on the road to a job at the Fox network from this skewed, biased, and just all out wrong piece of nonsense that you are labeling as journalism.

Leave a comment

To comment anonymously or if signed in, leave name and e-mail blank.

Donate