I’ve noticed when The Badger Herald talks about Wisconsin’s budget, it suggests we have a “surplus” or a “balanced budget” when, in fact, Gov. Scott Walker has run deficits every year and has increased Wisconsin’s debt by $320 million currently (by his administration’s admission) and by potentially up to $714 million in the coming years. This increased debt is a result of a $558 million loan the Walker administration took out in June 2011, according to the Wisconsin’s Legislative Fiscal Bureau.
Using the generally accepted accounting principles standard, Wisconsin Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch admitted to U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius in an official letter Wisconsin has $3.02 billion in debt through April 2013 — up from $2.7 billion when Walker took office.
Walker borrowed $558 million so he could give the false impression of a “balanced budget” because there is now money in the bank, never mind the increased debt obligation as a result of the additional $156 million in interest. Walker used the gimmicky cash accounting method that doesn’t reflect the actual debt to make the budget look better than it really is — breaking an explicit promise from his 2010 gubernatorial campaign to “require the use of generally accepted accounting principles to balance every state budget.”
John Birkholz ([email protected]) is a Madison resident.

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.
We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.