Opinion: Editorial

Better to build Babel than babble about building

At the risk of offending Geico’s cavemen and upsetting the insurance company’s legal department, this editorial board’s policy on student housing in Madison can be broken down pretty simply:

More housing good. Drives down rental costs for students. Improves living conditions to slightly better standards than apartments in Yemen. Yay.

We are pleased to hear “Lord” Otto Gebhardt III has proposed a plan to erect two high-rise apartment complexes near the University of Wisconsin campus at the corner of Spring and Orchard streets. According to Gebhardt, two “obsolete” rental houses would be demolished, with the replacement buildings nearly doubling the number of apartments available.

Modeled off Gebhardt’s Park Terrace West apartment complexes, the new structures would be energy efficient and provide parking space. With demolition of the current buildings possible as early as August, the project could be completed in time for the fall 2011 semester.

Though the height of the structures is always a concern when new developments are proposed — Gebhardt hopes the Spring Street building will reach 10 stories, while the Orchard Street complex will finish at nine — maintaining a tasteful d�cor isn’t really a concern in this area of town. Flanked by the Charter Heating and Cooling Plant to the east and a McDonalds to the west, the block currently has the aesthetic appeal of Gary, Indiana. A few snazzy-looking high-rises could only help at this point.

So what could possibly delay a seemingly fruitful plan for all parties involved?

Unfortunately, the land Gebhardt wishes to build upon is currently included in UW’s master plan for expansion, and is scheduled to be utilized in the creation of a new academic building sometime in the next 15 to 20 years — although they have not yet purchased all the land for such development. While constructing 10-story buildings that might not last more than a few decades seems foolhardy, Gebhardt is aware of the risk and is fine with turning over the land to UW when the university is ready to build on it.

“The thing is, the plan says 15 to 20 years is the minimum,” Gebhardt said in an interview with Paul Snyder of the Daily Reporter. “It might not actually happen for 30 or 35 years.”

For its part, UW remains detached from Gebhardt’s proposal, and “the university neither supports nor objects,” according to an e-mail from Gary Brown, director of campus planning and landscape architecture for UW-Madison Facilities Planning & Management.

So while it may be baffling as to why someone would be willing to invest in such a tenuous project, it is not our money, nor the city’s moneyfor that matter. These apartments can only bring joy to students’ lives — or at least mild comfort and wireless Internet — and the Urban Design Commission shouldn’t stand in the way of that. Students won’t have a problem with this, quite the opposite in fact, and UW seems fine with the proposal. Urban Design Commission, let Lord Otto tear down these walls!

Have a thought? We welcome your input, but please be polite and stay on topic wherever possible. Your comment may be deleted if it is inappropriately off topic or promotional or if it is unnecessarily rude or contains personal attacks. We may delete comments for other reasons as well. Just keep it simple and focus on your points as respectfully as possible.

We allow and encourage comments employing satire, wit and irony to make points. Do not flag comments just because you disagree. Flagged comments will be immunized from further flagging unless they stray far from the guidelines and do not add to the discussion. Before flagging a comment you think is offensive, consider your time might be better spent rebutting it than censoring it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

1 older comment

user-pic

why is he referred to as”Lord” Otto? Who is this guy?

Donate