Opinion: Column
Stunned by the stun gun, police
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Sean Kittridge:
- Despite problems, online courses may be promising (September 9, 2009)
- Mercury Marine employees deploy S.O.S; Save Our Salaries (September 1, 2009)
- Bus to catch? Enjoy the commute! (July 22, 2009)
- Sanford and the art of lazy lying (June 26, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
It’s hard to comprehend, but for one night last year inside Camp Randall stadium, someone was getting a worse deal than the students crammed into sections J through P. Sure, we may have been packed onto those benches tighter than Rod Stewart in spandex, but at least the biggest shock we faced was a crushing loss to the Penn State Nittany Lions. For Margaret Hiebing, the 54-year-old woman who was Tasered that night, the electricity of a Badger football game was truly a literal experience.
Just to be clear, Hiebing didn’t murder anyone earlier that day. She didn’t steal a wealthy family’s baby or even illegally download music. To warrant the passage of 1,000-plus volts of electricity through her body, she sat in the aisle. According to Hiebing, seat vultures took the seats assigned to her and her husband, so she took one on the step. Although I doubt it was in protest, and I highly suspect it to be a juvenile response, it’s hardly an offense that suggests a call to Thor’s handgun.
But it’s always easier to shoot first and ask questions of wrongdoing later, so the police wisely decided to take the path most taken. Some of the details are fuzzy — the police say she resisted them, and to be fair, there still hasn’t been an admission of error on the part of the 5-0, but one thing is clear: Hiebing is $50,000 richer.
The settlement was reached Tuesday, after Hiebing claimed her civil rights were violated and that police used excessive force. But before you admit you’d gladly take a Taser to the chest for $50,000, keep in mind stories like these should never be about the money. This is about the diluted idea of “force,” the machismo of triggers and badges and almost every early ’90s hip-hop song.
Contrary to popular belief, law enforcement officers aren’t simply a bunch of high school bullies with gym passes and mustache combs. No, some of them were junior college bullies. But even more, the vast majority of them recognize the importance of their jobs, and their responsibility to the people. Police work is public service in its most pure essence, and God knows I could never pull over a known criminal or wear collared shirts every day.
But there is a massive difference between protecting the public from an armed drug dealer and a middle-aged woman. This is not a situation that should be handled with any force beyond a stern hand on the arm or possibly some dragging. Tasering a 54-year-old lady is like taking a shotgun to that mounted moose’s head at Bennigan’s. It’s makes you feel big, but you’re going to have some explaining to do.
The problem, as has been stated many times before, is that a Taser is not a gun, and while that seems like a good thing, it’s not. Police tend to avoid firing their guns because killing someone is both a major guilt trip and some serious paperwork. Tasers allow you sleep easy at night, because hey, the box says they’re non-lethal. But life isn’t that simple. Stairs never look like an enemy until you’re a senior citizen with osteoporosis and a 30-year newspaper collection in your basement. Non-lethal is not synonymous with human target practice, and yet this appears to be the trend.
There was a time when police were portrayed by gentle figures like Andy Griffith and Don Knotts, not middle linebackers like Michael Chiklis. And while I’m sure Andy wouldn’t ever have given him one, it’s hard to see Deputy Fife Tasering a Mayberry rabble-rouser — though one can easily envision his accidentally discharging one on himself. But there’s a reason for this. Police force is glamorized, and even more, it’s easy. Talking to the law-breaker is tedious; stunning them motionless is like an arcade game.
Tasers aren’t inherently evil. They serve an absolutely necessary purpose, and police have eased many incredibly perilous situations thanks to their use. But more and more, they’re escalating mundane situations by using Tasers under non-dangerous circumstances. John Kerry wasn’t worried for his life that day at the University of Florida, and Margaret Hiebing wasn’t jeopardizing the safety of 80,000 Badger fans. But it happened. And it will happen again. But at least there are 50,000 reasons to feel all right about it.
Sean Kittridge (skittridge@badgerherald.com) is a senior majoring in journalism.
10 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
521 W Dayton 4BR/2BA. Marble showers, dishwasher, completely updated! madisoncampusrentals.com
1, 2, or 3 bedroom apartment available for spring 2010. meltzer@wisc.edu if you are interested!
You’ve captured some of the subtle issues swirling around tasers. Good work.
My blog has some useful links to facts.
I love the sound of women screaming when they get tased. Guys just yell, but women break the threshold of pain when they scream. It’s that tingle in the ears that brings such gratification. EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!!!! Aaaaaaah.
Tasers were supposed to be a non-lethal substitute for guns, but have morphed into a torture device used to punish those who are not sufficiently and immediately submissive.
Great article. Tazers are extremely oppressive and really don’t have a place in law enforcement. They make you immediately subject regardless of the situation.
3:43 PM, they also carry guns, pepper spray, billy clubs and the ol’ chokehold. If you ask the nice officers to employ an alternative method of incapacitating you, I’m sure they’ll be happy to accommodate you.
Yeah, because incapacitaion is the only way to to deal with an old lady sitting in the aisle, everybody knows that. Were these cops just too lazy to beat her down with their clubs? Afraid of overspray if they used the pepper? Worried about hard-to-clean-up blood stains if they shot her down like a mad dog?
Impose the death penalty for “crimes” like this and bring back respect for law and order!
Well at least this Cop got fired for using pepper spray on 61-year-old woman…after he stopped her for having over-tinted windows.
http://www.wwl.com/Officer-fired-after-pepper-spraying-61-year-old/5190774
9:40 AM, why didn’t the woman and her husband just find a stadium employee to assist her in getting the seat vultures to move? My understanding is that she was sitting in the aisle blocking traffic and she put up a fuss when asked to move. There was better way to deal with the situation, but she chose to be a self-righteous drama queen instead. OK, fine, if someone wants to be a bad-ass, knowing the consequences, let ‘em. You’d have to be Perez Hilton to not see the stupidity of her actions.
“but she chose to be a self-righteous drama queen instead”
Harpies like that should be shot on sight, not just tasered!
If you bothered to read what happened you would know that she did try to get help from security and then returned to her seat. Then the cops showed up and harrased her…the one who had filed the complaint….
Steve, I didn’t see anything in the article that says she tried to talk to any security employees about the situation.