Opinion: Column
AIG sparks Congress’ ignorance
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Gerald Cox:
- AIG sparks Congress' ignorance (March 22, 2009)
- Same old strategies won't save republicanism (March 2, 2009)
- Black leaders won't let America's racist heritage go (February 23, 2009)
- ASM constitution will not succeed without students (February 19, 2009)
- Early missteps mar new administration (February 16, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
I wish I worked at AIG. The insurance giant, whose name I believe stands for something like “Arrogance, Inability and Greed,” is the poster child of much of the economic mess Wall Street got us into and has received an unparalleled, jaw dropping, Third World-nation-GDP-sized $170 billion in taxpayer dollars to keep it afloat. And it just doled out bonuses totaling $218 million in December and March.
Reward for failure? I can handle that.
It’s hard to defend such a misuse of taxpayer funds. One can be certain it wasn’t private funds that paid these bonuses. It was taxpayer dollars. And that is just wrong. But just as inappropriate is the talk this somehow compares to the federal government’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Further, the amount of rage-fueled energy Congress and the masses have exhibited towards AIG would best be directed elsewhere.
Outrage has been swift and widespread. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, opined that AIG executives accepting the bonuses may want to consider suicide. The House hastily passed legislation that would levy a 90 percent federal tax on bonuses paid to bailed-out businesses. Add local taxes, and some employees would end up paying in taxes more than they had received in bonuses.
Congress hauled before them AIG CEO Edward Liddy, who had next to nothing to do with bonuses, agreed to buy a previous CEO before AIG was rescued by tax dollars. Committee members raked him over the coals for the $165 million doled out in March. They seemed to show very little interest in the rest of the $170 billion AIG had received.
But members of Congress aren’t the only ones upset. Populist rage is boiling over on Main Street. Citing death threats, AIG executives are warning AIG employees to hide AIG logos, or ID cards when travelling. Protestors descended on the Connecticut homes of AIG officials. People are coming up with clever and insulting meanings for the AIG acronym.
Meanwhile, the anger directed at AIG is revealing a disturbing tendency in our members of Congress: ignorance. If no one in Congress realized that private companies give bonuses, even bailed-out ones, then maybe it’s time we had less career politicians in Congress and a few more people who have actually had to work in private industry for a living. If Congress can demand auto manufacturers restructure the contracts they have with union workers, why not demand the same from white-collar industries?
A disciplined winding down of AIG, for all its financial tomfoolery, is essential. Congress is aware of that. And while Congress had little to do with AIG’s bailout — it was the Federal Reserve and the Treasury who put taxpayer dollars on the line for AIG — it must understand when you don’t allow a company to go into bankruptcy, you allow that company to remain in a position where it must honor its contractual agreements not just to the corporate entities it is beholden to, but also to its workers.
Couldn’t the Obama administration dispatch someone who can afford to say something unpopular — Vice President Joe Biden, I’m looking at you — to tell the American people the workers at AIG and other bailed-out firms are doing work that is essential to the health of the American economy? And companies don’t just owe corporate entities who hold their debt, but also the workers that run their company?
The hasty bailouts crafted by the Fed and Treasury aren’t flawless, but it would be self-defeating if populist rage were to effectively tie the hands of Congress in the unavoidable bailouts of the near future and effectively halt the nascent recovery of 2009.
Further, and I won’t be the first to argue this, but the $165 million that Congress is most infuriated with is a pittance compared to what we have already put into propping up AIG. It amounts to less than 1 percent of the bailout funds AIG has received. We aren’t just paying for AIG bonuses, we’re paying for AIG coffee mugs, pens, toilet paper. We’re paying the wages of AIG’s workers. That’s what happens when you own the lion’s share of a company. The people at AIG and Wall Street aren’t all saints, but making them into demons is unproductive. It’s time to move on.
Gerald Cox (gcox@badgerherald.com) is a senior majoring in economics.
8 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
1318 RANDALL Court: Huge five bedroom house located near Camp Randall. $2500/mo. Call 257-7368.
LANGDON AREA Housing: Studios through five bedrooms available 8/16/2010. All apartments offer lake/pier access. Most units include heat. Call 257-7368.
I’m glad Medicare and Social Security have been fixed, otherwise the media attention to this relatively small amount of money would seem pathetic.
Michael Lewis absolutely skewers the silliness of the political class over the AIG bonuses in the must-read column of the day.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_lewis&sid=atlHxXH7FweQ
I rather they try to get back all the millions paid to the ex-Clitonistas that were running FRDDIE MAC and SALLIE MAE as they were buying up all those toxic sub-prime loans. THAT would be worth doing.
An Econ major graduating this year defending a Wall Street firm. Shhhhoooooocccckkkker!
Clitonista? Is that like a radical feminist?
Pay your federal taxes to your home state. It’s the only way to stop the insanity. We’ll be rich and the only recession will be the one in Washington. Shall we?
Hmmmmmm….
Our Obama Team’s Tax Cheat Tim Geitner ‘invests’ our national assets in AIG to the tune of Billions of dollars….. and then Obama and our Democrat controlled congress further damage our new investment with their stupid pandering to populist mob sentiment.
Is that Barbara Streisand I hear, singing the Obamanation theme song? “Send in the Clowns. Don’t bother, They’re here!”
Invictus Maneo
The bad actors at AIG escaped without a scratch - the poor saps that tried to clean up the mess are the ones getting all the grief.
DEAR Mr. Liddy,
It is with deep regret that I submit my notice of resignation from A.I.G. Financial Products. I hope you take the time to read this entire letter. Before describing the details of my decision, I want to offer some context:
I am proud of everything I have done for the commodity and equity divisions of A.I.G.-F.P. I was in no way involved in — or responsible for — the credit default swap transactions that have hamstrung A.I.G. Nor were more than a handful of the 400 current employees of A.I.G.-F.P. Most of those responsible have left the company and have conspicuously escaped the public outrage.
After 12 months of hard work dismantling the company — during which A.I.G. reassured us many times we would be rewarded in March 2009 — we in the financial products unit have been betrayed by A.I.G. and are being unfairly persecuted by elected officials. In response to this, I will now leave the company and donate my entire post-tax retention payment to those suffering from the global economic downturn. My intent is to keep none of the money myself.
I take this action after 11 years of dedicated, honorable service to A.I.G. I can no longer effectively perform my duties in this dysfunctional environment, nor am I being paid to do so. Like you, I was asked to work for an annual salary of $1, and I agreed out of a sense of duty to the company and to the public officials who have come to its aid. Having now been let down by both, I can no longer justify spending 10, 12, 14 hours a day away from my family for the benefit of those who have let me down.
but read the whole thing
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/25/opinion/25desantis.html?_r=2&ref=opinion