Opinion
Cheating admirable - with conditions
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Jordan Soffer:
- Balance needed in Israel (April 9, 2009)
- Religion not social menace nor guideline for civil law (March 24, 2009)
- Sigma Chi deserves a chance to defend reputation (March 9, 2009)
- Cheating admirable - with conditions (February 26, 2009)
- Jin's: Essential part of Madison (February 3, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
In the mid-1990s, President Bill Clinton had an extramarital affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. He deplorably and inexcusably cheated on his wife, his family and his country. In December, news broke that businessman Bernie Madoff organized and operated one of the largest Ponzi schemes is world history and cheated Americans across the country out of their life savings. If he is indeed guilty of that which he has been accused, he unpardonably stole billions of dollars from innocent investors. Towards the end of January, President Obama signed an order to close Guantanamo Bay within a year. He did so after it became apparent that prisoners there were illegally denied their rights in order to coerce information out of them.
Obviously, there are countless instances when appalling and selfish acts of cheating have resulted in atrocious consequences. But that begs the question as to what was actually wrong; was it the cheating itself or was it the ensuing consequences? Simply put, cheating is not always wrong. In fact, there are many examples that give substance to the cliché “If you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying.” There is nothing intrinsically wrong with cheating, just with cheating that ultimately leads to unfortunate situations. It is not the cheating that is wrong; it is the shortsightedness of the charlatan that makes it such.
On Feb. 11, the Herald published an article detailing a recent study conducted by Rutgers University that shows that business students are the most likely to cheat. The article said that “53 percent of business school students and 48 percent of students studying other academic fields reported written cheating, including plagiarism from print or Internet sources.” This article and these statistics were met with many different reactions. Some didn’t feel it mattered; they felt the information was trivial and inconsequential. As Donald McCabe, a professor at RU’s business school, put it, “I don’t think the students consider it as serious an issue.” Others write it off as a travesty; they argue that it is a terrible embarrassment and all cheaters must be prosecuted to the full extent of university law. Many like me, however, met this article with a giant bravo. Good for the business students, I say.
I have been told since I was young that if you cheat on a test, you are only cheating yourself; if that is the case (which I believe it to be), cheat on. When Alex Rodriguez was caught using steroids, were people disturbed because he cheated himself? No, we were upset because he cheated the game! When Irv Blitzer snuck weights to the front of his bobsled to give Team USA an unfair advantage in the Cool Runnings Olympics of 1972, were we all disappointed because he hurt his own personal integrity? No, we were upset because he cheated his country. We, (society) don’t get upset when people cheat themselves, we get upset when they cheat us or people like us.
When these students cheated, ultimately, they only cheated themselves. To those who assert that by cheating these students are breaking the integrity of their respective university, I simply ask how? Justifiably or not, at the end of the day, in the tradition that our country has come to embrace, all that really matters is grades. When you hand in your résumé and it says GPA: 3.8 on it, that looks a hell of a lot more impressive than “I never cheated.” These students are doing everything in their power to ensure that they set themselves up for the brightest possible future if you think they are wrong for that, do not blame them! Blame the society that has raised them to believe that good grades are of a greater importance than a fine education.
Other people can even argue that by cheating they are affecting the curve, and that argument is just sad. The idea of a grade quota, in which a certain percentage of kids must fall into every letter-grade category is borderline humorous. The notion that we allow a system in which students are not graded on their own merit, but rather by comparing them to others in the class should not be acceptable. What if no one deserves to fail? What if every student happens to deserve an AB? The fact that by cheating these kids are potentially weakening everyone else’s chances by knocking down the curve is not the fault of the cheater, it is the fault of the university for allowing such a ludicrous grading method.
If one is able to cheat without any negative consequences, they would be cheating themselves if they didn’t cheat. To even go a step further, one can find examples where cheating is necessary, even condoned. It is ironic that in 1984 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to allow evidence obtained illegally if it is proven that it could have been found legally. That is a completely absurd corruption of what the law should be. Evidence that could have been found legally but instead is found illegally should be dismissed; attorneys should be expected to go as far as they can to find evidence legally. If such a ridiculous concept of legal scholarship constitutes justice, than a somewhat less absurd standard should take its place: evidence that could not have been found unless it was done illegally should be admitted. If cheating is necessary to catch a criminal, cheating should be accepted. The U.S. exclusionary rule is simply a preposterous byproduct of a ridiculous cultural definition of cheating. In July of 2008, Adam Liptak of The New York Times wrote a piece on how only in the U.S. is the process too strict. The U.S. should take a lesson from countries around the world and realize that sometimes cheating is not condemnable, it is even commendable.
Rules are not meant to be broken. Rules have been established in order to ensure a certain social order and avoid corruption and dishonesty. However, certain rules are definitely bendable. If one is certain that by breaking a rule they will somehow guarantee a greater good, or even that they simply won’t hurt anyone but themselves, they should act outside the rulebook. Business students are not hurting the integrity of the business world (in fact, that is an oxymoronic aphorism), and they certainly aren’t compromising the veracity of academia (i.e. try your hardest). Don’t challenge them as to why they cheat, challenge society as to why we look so down upon it.
Jordan Soffer (soffer@wisc.edu) is a sophomore with an undecided major.
14 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Fans of Waits will not be disappointed
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
SPRING SUBLET: 1 bedroom in 2 bedroom at the Aberdeen. Rent negotiable. Email arkramer@wisc.edu
GENTLE WOMEN...THROUGH the lens of Douglas J. Nesbit, newly released book now available for holiday gifts! www.gentlewomen.us
IP hash: 8f711626
Good grief, kid. If you ever walk into my classroom for an exam, I’m making you sit in the front row.
IP hash: 5f6f8989
How are the students cheating the reputation of their university?
If I hire some of these new grads, with their impressive records — Habitual cheaters are going to flounder compared to legitimately successful students. Even If I just fire them, I’ve still wasted time and money on these people. And maybe I blame the university, since how can they possibly get such good grades when they are incompetent?
I thought I’d seen some stupid op-ed columns, but my god…
IP hash: 55a0649b
Nobody buys this. In fact, wise people would call this a slacker’s maxim. I’m working to get good grades honestly, and I don’t want bums who want, who want the degree more than actually learning about their future careers, getting the good jobs.
Businesses who are looking to hire actually do care about honesty, because although fraud sounds like a rocking good time, it might cost them money.
IP hash: 0fca6300
You cheated and stole this from “The Onion, didn’t you?
IP hash: f742c5db
I’m not sure what I think of this peice, but it is interesting that all of you brush it off so quickly. This kid does make really good points about curves and about the government. I’m not saying that cheating is right, and if that’s what he is suggesting than maybe I misread it, but it definitely is a different perspective than what you generally hear. Props on thinking outside the box and telling it like a lot of people actually see it
IP hash: d19955c6
You raise some pretty good points. Cheaters do what everyone else wants to do, SUCCEED. They get good grades, and they are obviously doing something right. If I am paying people by the hour, I would much rather them be able to find the solutions quickly, then spend hours upon hours learning things in order to give me an answer. I don’t really care if my employees know why something is, but rather that they know the answer! Whether they got it from someone else, or themselves.
IP hash: a0624c2f
i agree one hundred percent. i feel however, taht sometimes you are too wise for your own good mr. soffer.
IP hash: 37b8bcce
The point of going to college is to learn and prepare yourself for your career. Grades are not as important as you think, but generally those who actually make an attempt to learn get good grades anyway.
IP hash: 3a49b1de
if you want to cheat, then you’ve convinced yourself that your education doesn’t mean shit to you.
IP hash: bdb518c6
So cheating is good? Because I really don’t want to invest my life savings with some idiot who only got through business school by cheating. And I really don’t want to have life-saving surgery performed on my by some doctor who would have flunked out of medical school if he or she hadn’t cheated. And if I ever have to defend myself in court, I really don’t want to be represented by someone who only passed the bar by cheating.
IP hash: d65e63b4
Good luck finding a job now. Everyone who reads this column is going to assume that you cheated your way through school.
IP hash: 94e5cd12
I think you raise some wonderful points that should be addressed by society. By the honest nature of this article I have a feeling you yourself are not a “cheater” but clearly the “devil’s advocate”
IP hash: 75d56caf
Bravo, Mr. Soffer!!! Keep up the good work!What a wonderful, thought provoking article. So much better than all those boring, self-righteous pundits have to offer. Those who take it too seriously surely cheat themselves every day of their lives…cheat themselves of humor, lightheartedness, and the simple ability to distinquish the meat from the fat.The message you send is so important, on so many different levels and I applaud you!!
IP hash: a493c2fa
I don’t understand your premise. How is it that cheaters don’t cheapen everyone’s accomplishments? Seems to me like that qualifies as hurting others.