Opinion: Column
Tuition freezes not best solution to money woes
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Jason Smathers:
- If you're going to be a maverick, Wisconsin, do it right (September 23, 2009)
- UC and ASM: A match made in (you fill in the blank) (September 9, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
The University of Wisconsin won’t know what’s hitting it.
Oh sure, we know the economic crisis has the potential to gut us whole.
We understand, via Biddy Martin’s concerted effort to debate possible cuts, that we’ll end up having to hack off our own limbs to save the whole body.
But for a university that maintains dependence — at least partially — on the state Legislature, the proposed budget will likely result in mass panic when those hiding from the storms of the job market find their academic shelter destroyed by an economic tsunami. And while we’re certainly preparing for the worst, there’s one thing that could devastate UW if we’re not careful.
Tuition.
It is our constant lifesaver — whenever gifts, grants and funding dry up, tuition becomes the last resort in keeping a university in the academic pantheon.
But with election of Barack Obama and the increasing grassroots movement determined to make the voices of those student voters heard, tuition increases are being directly targeted. College is already becoming unaffordable, and for a society that believes you can only succeed with that sort of an education, lack of access is a dangerous thing.
Ask Chynna Haas, founder of the Working Class Student Union, who took the “Day of Action” demonstration as an opportunity to voice her (and plenty of other students’) demand for a tuition freeze or accompanying dollar-for-dollar increase in financial aid.
And voices like hers have been heard.
In another state. By someone with a lot more power.
Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm has essentially dangled a stick and carrot in front of Michigan’s public universities: Either freeze your tuition or lose financial aid and funding.
Granholm’s predicament isn’t without merit. Many in Michigan have seen public tuition skyrocket without any real effort by Michigan’s colleges to curtail their costs and think this “do or die” move will force the universities to rethink their programs and finances in more fiscally responsible ways.
But thinking absolutely about tuition becomes problematic when you are unsure of what the rest of your financial outlook is like. The universities are uncertain what to do about Granholm’s plan because they’re unsure what they’ll actually receive at the end of the day. Granholm has indicated that colleges will be given incentives to freeze tuition, but in a state where the main employers are facing virtual extinction in the near future and could take the state’s tax revenue further into the depths, you have to assume the state’s Legislature couldn’t offer much. Especially when it’s been offering state schools less each passing year.
For schools such as the University of Michigan, this probably wouldn’t normally be much of an issue. Most of their funding comes from private sources and federal funding for research projects, so if they were to take a hit from the state Legislature, the “U” could sustain the hit. Especially after such a successful fundraising drive.
But not during these times. Michigan’s endowment took a massive hit as a result of the financial crisis — not in any small part due to the fact that a great deal was invested in the Detroit automakers. They might actually need everything they can get in the way of funding. Which means ultimatums might force them into a corner too and make this world-class institution slump for a year or two. Or three.
But of course, Granholm’s idea probably won’t migrate over Lake Michigan. Martin has made it clear that tuition must be raised significantly, and our tuition-to-quality ratio almost necessitates an increase to take the strain off of certain departments.
But it’s been suggested before by Republicans and Democrats at the state Capitol. And it may get suggested again.
But more importantly, it brings the debate over accessibility versus quality to a fever pitch. Last year, I spent a few days deciding whether or not UW should prioritize quality over accessibility and decided (in “UW can have cake, eat it too”) that UW-Madison was in a position where it can reach both goals.
But that was before our state — and nation, for that matter — stood on the brink of collapse. The issue of affordability is no longer just about working-class students who are historically prevented from higher education by rising costs — it now becomes about whether the majority of future generations will be classed out of a proper education and reduce most of this country to manual labor. And when that apocalyptic scenario becomes even somewhat feasible, it makes it very hard to hold on to every bit of academic performance that makes us a world-class institution.
But it’s about panic for the time being. If the Legislature can keep its paws off tuition, this scenario won’t come about.
But then again, these are strange times.
Jason Smathers (jsmathers@badgerherald.com) is a senior majoring in history and journalism.
7 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
President’s Visit Marked a Speech to One of the Last Groups Not Critical of Him
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Missouri has posed the same deal to its colleges and universities as Michigan, fyi.
If UW had UM’s current tuition level it could easily absorb whatever cuts it might in state funding. UM gets about double the total tuition revenue as Wisconsin. We are talking $400,000,000 vs $800,000,000.
The Great College Hoax Kathy Kristof, 01.14.09, 06:00 PM EST Forbes Magazine dated February 02, 2009
Higher education can be a financial disaster. Especially with the return on degrees down and student loan sharks on the prowl.
… victims of an unfolding education hoax on the middle class that’s just as insidious, and nearly as sweeping, as the housing debacle. The ingredients are strikingly similar, too: Misguided easy-money policies that are encouraging the masses to go into debt; a self-serving establishment trading in half-truths that exaggerate the value of its product; plus a Wall Street money machine dabbling in outright fraud as it foists unaffordable debt on the most vulnerable marks.
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0202/060.html
very little analysis in this piece. why can’t journalists dig beyond the obvious? it’s not ok to assume that because PUBLIC institutions are partially funded by private sources the Legislature can continue to under-fund them. This is a PUBLIC institution and should be funded by the Legislature without raising tuition to the point where it takes over 50% of a low-income family’s annual income to put one student through the UW.
Tuition freeze may not be the best way to fix economic woes but raising tuition will make matters worse. The unemployment rate is over 7% , most American families couldn’t afford to send their kids to college before the recession and far less now that there’s over 3 million jobs lost. Something does need to be done about higher education and its costs, but right now we should focus on lowering the unemployment rate and home foreclosures.
Plus, if the university finds itself in need of funds, they could give a pay cut to overpaid employees such as Brett Bielman. I think he was signed for a $7 million dollar contract.. is that really necessary? Look at Patterno, his salary is $400,000 and he even said in an interview that he refuses salary increases because he wants the money the program makes to go to the university to improve academic programs. That’s how it should be here at UW. We may not be Penn State, but i think we could try to follow their example. Oh and what about the free cake the university was handing out the other day, enough for 1500 students. I’m all about free cake but if the university is really worried about lack of funding maybe they shouldn’t be spending money like that.
I don’t think much of football coach’s compensation comes from either the university or the state.
Do you really think that football ticket sales should support academics?
“very little analysis in this piece. why can’t journalists dig beyond the obvious? it’s not ok to assume that because PUBLIC institutions are partially funded by private sources the Legislature can continue to under-fund them.”
It’s also unfortunate that readers assume that journalists take the most basic points and throw it together in a column.
I don’t assume that it’s OK for the Legislature to underfund UW. But I do assume that given a $5.6 billion deficit, giving it more funding is next to impossible. In fact, to give UW MORE money in the face of such strain is almost irresponsible governance of a state.
As much as people can clamor and say we need to invest more money in higher education ESPECIALLY in a recession, we don’t have ANYONE to be able to put up the funds except the federal government (and they’re not really in much of a state to do that — hell, they’re just having trouble tacking on an increase in Pell Grants onto the stimulus bill.)
I’m sorry you think there’s “very little analysis” here, but just because I don’t follow your viewpoint doesn’t mean I don’t share your views. In normal conditions, I would.
But, bluntly put, people like you demand water when the house is on fire. And you disgust me.