Opinion: Guest column
Ed board misses bus on fare hike
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Jack Craver:
- Ice ice baby, crimping my style (December 10, 2008)
- Prisons reveal Legislature's betrayal (December 3, 2008)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
I’ve only been in France for three weeks and already I’ve lost track of the number of conversations I’ve had with locals about the services they take for granted and we Americans pay dearly for.
The shame I feel for my country when I tell Europeans how much I pay for a semester of college perhaps borders on treason, and it is even more depressing when I tell them, no, Barack Obama probably isn’t going to be able to do that much to change it.
Nevertheless, a social welfare state does not just operate on goodwill, as I was reminded quite forcefully last week when I had to pay a fine of 41 euro (please don’t tell me the exchange rate in the comments section) after getting caught by the metro police without a metro ticket. It was especially frustrating because I hadn’t actually intended to cheat — I had simply forgot my weekly pass at home.
As unfortunate an incident as this was, it at least highlighted that the city of Rennes has its priorities straight when it comes to city services. Cheaters pay dearly so regular people can have affordable public transport. Rennes, a city of roughly 300,000, has a metro line and an extensive bus network. Tickets cost 1.20 euro, and there are heavy discounts for weekly, monthly and yearly passes.
Therefore I was disheartened to read The Badger Herald Editorial Board’s logically dubious endorsement of Mayor Dave Cieslewicz’s plan to raise the Madison city bus fare by 25 cents. Even more puzzling was the board’s attempt to explain support for an even bigger hike of 50 cents.
The authors, perhaps out of some perverse commitment to trickle-down economics, asserted a fare increase of 50 cents (33 percent!) on the city’s poorest would be preferable to an absolutely negligible tax increase on the city’s wealthiest given the state of the economy.
Especially comical was the math the Editorial Board so generously provided its readers. After claiming that looking for assistance from tax increases would be inappropriate, the board pulled out their calculators: “We endorse the 50-cent price hike for reasons of simple math. The 25-cent fare raise would only cut the estimated [Madison Metro Transit] shortfall to $360,000. We are loath to endorse a policy change that will burden low-income commuters, but we also recognize a crippled bus system serves no one.”
Did they even spend a minute thinking about what kind of tax increase (gasp!) it would take to eliminate a $760,000 deficit in a city of a quarter million people? Reading about why fare increases are preferable to tax increases reminded me of former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who asserted without blinking an eye that he never raised taxes as governor — he only raised fees.
I admit I know very little about the specificities of the issue. The fare increase on individual tickets may not be so bad as long as the transit keeps intact discounts for regular commuters (10 tickets cost $12 and monthly passes cost $41). Having people like me who use the buses occasionally but don’t depend on them pay extra for tickets may be a relatively fair way to fund the system. If only the board had argued for such a plan. Instead it subscribed to the right-wing economic narrative of the past three decades: The poor must carry a financial burden that, for one reason or another, the rich cannot afford to take on.
With billions of dollars from the federal stimulus plan coming to the states, this is the time for cities like Madison to invest heavily in mass transportation for both economic and environmental purposes. With Rep. Dave Obey, D-Wis., chairing the House Appropriations Committee and Reps. Tammy Baldwin and Ron Kind in influential positions on the Energy and Commerce Committee and the Natural Resources Committee, respectively, Wisconsin is in a unique position to take advantage of the massive amount of funds allocated for infrastructure over the next decade.
Recognizing that public transportation is an important and worthwhile investment and that it was not invented just for New Yorkers is the vital step for the next generation of urban planners. However, our commitment to keeping that service affordable and accessible, especially to those who are least likely to have cars, is equally important.
I hope the arguments the Editorial Board advanced in this particular case do not represent the standard for this semester. Otherwise, perhaps the next editorial, in the name of fiscal discipline, will call for increasing college tuition.
Jack Craver (craver@wisc.edu) is a junior majoring in history and French.
5 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
President’s Visit Marked a Speech to One of the Last Groups Not Critical of Him
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Maybe you should stay in France then…
Based on what I’ve found, the total tax rate in France comes to 48.3%. In the US it is only 30%. You pay for it either way.
Also, when the budget is 5 BILLION in the hole, just for the state of Wisconsin, that isn’t the time too look at major spending projects unless they are going to create a boat load of jobs. It might be a wee bit wiser to figure out how to pay for all the crap we’ve already committed to first.
This is up there with the complaints from Europe that the US (government) doesn’t donate enough money to natural disasters around the world. Part they forget is that their government is simply choosing the donations with their tax money. The US people make more donations, thus making us the largest charity givers in the world…
Jack, have you even looked at the tax rates over in France? With such high levels of taxation on the most productive workers, it’s no wonder that the French economy is generally much worse than America’s and that some services can be so heavily subsidized.
When you come back to the US, I highly encourage an Econ 101 course.
“Otherwise, perhaps the next editorial, in the name of fiscal discipline, will call for increasing college tuition.”
Uh, Jack, there are quite a few people who do support a tuition increase. Next time when you want to try point out an absurd argument the Herald would never run a column on in the Op-ed section try something like legalizing drunken driving. O, wait…
let’s remember that france has such high tax rates because they provide dirt cheap education and free health care. maybe we don’t pay for health insurance yet, but piled on top of student loans, that sure is going to hurt in a few years…maybe france won’t look so bad then.
I may disagree pretty fervently with this Craver character, but one cannot imagine the types of exotic delicacies I would gladly eat out of his anus.