Local solutions for energy crucial

Sharing Tools:

E-mail this article:




by Ben Patterson
Friday, November 21, 2008 00:00

Now that the election is over and we’re all waiting for that lame duck to die, it’s a great time to actually focus on the real tasks at hand: accomplishing the goals President-elect Obama set during his campaign.

There are so many things on our soon-to-be president’s plate: fixing the economy, health care, social security and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. I hope he’s hungry.

Surprisingly, the issue of energy has been near the top of Obama’s list and for good reason.

Energy has often been looked at as an issue we can get around to once we finish everything else, but from early on in the campaign, the Obama team has recognized the priority to transform energy production and consumption in the United States into a modern standard.

Our country currently consumes 25 percent but only produces 16 percent of the world’s energy. Obviously we have an incredible dependence on foreign, pollution-heavy energy, a reality the Obama administration realizes is a matter of national security and moral responsibility.

To remedy this addiction, the Obama team has prescribed some medications in the form of policy reforms. According to Obama’s website, his administration plans to ensure minimum percentage of renewable energy production, “weatherize” millions of homes, develop clean coal technology and implement other policy initiatives to poise America at the forefront of energy efficiency and climate control.

Although these plans sound spectacular and will be a welcome change from our current administration’s Industrial Revolution energy mentality, many of the changes needed to fix our country’s energy issues will require individual attention and cannot be fixed with any administration’s broad, sweeping policy changes.

Most important of these individual changes will be the need for a revolution in our personal energy consumption. When we flip the light switch we expect light, but this simple expectation is a microcosm for our energy issues.

Energy is an asset that, for too long, has been seen more as a right than a privilege. However, the consequences of this perceived right are currently in the process of jeopardizing other fundamental rights. Our nation’s sovereignty is compromised by our perpetual dependence to oil-producing countries in the Middle East, while our health and mere existence is put in danger by our continued destruction of the environment through the emission of fossil fuels.

In response to this dilemma, green energy is becoming a major industry in the United States, creating millions of jobs while improving energy consumption and our effects on the environment. Companies like Renewable Choice Energy have been at the forefront of the trend to replace pollution-heavy energy production with renewable alternatives.

The pollution problem is rooted in our electric grid. It currently works like a giant bathtub. Energy is produced by fossil fuels, nuclear power and limited renewable alternatives. The energy is all compiled into one “tank” and is then distributed out to everyone. Currently, there is no way to ensure the energy you consume is clean energy.

Renewable Choice, in an effort to curb this pollution production, buys energy from renewable resources in bulk and then sells credits to corporations like Whole Foods. By selling these credits, Renewable Choice supports renewable energy producers with the hope they will be able to eventually control production of all energy production in the future, thus eliminating the need for pollution-heavy methods.

Surprising to many, there are very simple measures an individual can take to not contribute to our country’s energy problems without sacrificing much. A company based here in Madison called Powered Green (Poweredgreen.com) uses the same methods Renewable Choice does but on the individual level. The company buys energy but sells credits to individuals instead of corporations for the cost of a laptop’s fossil fuel energy consumption. By buying these credits, an individual ensures the energy his or her laptop uses over its lifetime is entirely from a renewable energy source.

Energy will remain a major issue in our country in the years to come. It’s not only in our best interest, but the world’s as well, to find new alternatives to our pollution-heavy energy production. Green energy will reduce foreign dependence, create new jobs in this growing sector and mitigate the effects our reckless consumption has had on our planet. Policy changes are a great start to changing our countries energy issues, but it will take a concerted effort on the individual level if we ever want to see the change we all crave.

Ben Patterson (bpatterson@wisc.edu) is senior majoring in political science.


Feedback
Anonymous (November 21, 2008 @ 7:39am):

I think the market collapse will make your suggestions no longer an option, but a necessity I want to point out that McMansions and V8 SUVs are going to be the goals and status symbols of a previous generation, not yours.

Anonymous (November 21, 2008 @ 9:26am):

Everybody wants wind power but no one wants to see (or hear) a windmill, or to see any tranmission lines.

Burning ANYTHING is no good either, so don't even think about a wood stove! Just sit in the dark and shiver.

Maybe global cooling will ease off, and we'll get some of that Global Warming(tm) forecast by the Goracle.

Anonymous (November 21, 2008 @ 9:45am):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLxicwiBQ7Q

Anonymous (November 21, 2008 @ 10:30am):

You are right that the US should domesticly produce more of its own energy. That is not a 'new policy' nor is it attributable to Obama, however.

The US has coal reserves sufficient to meet our TOTAL energy needs for 100 years. It is the least expensive fuel available, bar none, and it is right here in the US. Our research dollars would best be spent enhancing the efficiency and cleanliness of coal combustion power plants and coal-to-liquid fuels (gas, jet fuel, home heating oil, etc)conversion plants, if freedom from foreign sources of oil is truly desired.

Nuclear fission power plants can generate their own fuels through breeder reactor facilities. They are a well understood and safe technology that France has used for the last 30 years to generate 70% of it's total electical energy needs. Implementation within the US requires acceptance of a standard design and streamlining of construction permits to get this proven source of moderate cost power contributing significantly once again.

We have oil reserves in many areas within the US and off shore that remain untapped, due to Luddite legal constraints. We need that energy now, but Obama and the Pelosi/Reid strangled Congress will do nothing to enhance our own oil production capabilities.

Low cost energy spurs economic opportunity for all Americans and all American businesses. The economic "pie" gets bigger and more people get their slice of the American Dream.

Conversely, high cost energy penalizes American business, cripples productivity and investment, and acts as a direct regressive tax on low income families. The economic "pie" gets smaller, economies go into recession, people get laid off, and more people become poor. The exceedingly high energy prices of the last 2 years triggered a world wide recession. Obama, Pelosi, and Reid policies guarantee that those high prices will return with a vengence. But none of that seem to register with Poly Sci majors.

Belief in chimera such as Man Made Global Warming is worse than a tax. It diverts huge amounts of capital and human effort in quixotic attacks on problems that don't exist. 31,000 American scientists have reviewed the UN-IPCC Global Warming Reports and supporting documentation and concluded "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or greenhouse gases is causing, or will cause in the foreseeable future, catastrophic heating of the earths atmosphere?." (Ref: The Glogal Warming Petition Project, http://www.petitionproject.org/ ).

That trumps empty rhetoric from a Poly Sci major any day...

Invictus Maneo

Anonymous (November 21, 2008 @ 10:54am):

Not that facts matter to the Global Warmists but...


Planet Has Cooled Since Bush Took Office

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=bc1bbad9-802a-23ad-4547-af3df032e569

Anonymous (November 22, 2008 @ 10:50am):

10:30 -

Yeah, it was definitely high energy costs that caused the recession and not people defaulting on the ridiculously large loans that they took out to build the ridiculously large houses that they can't actually afford.

Americans are idiots and they wrecked their own economy.

FYI, the National Academy of Sciences rejected the Oregon Petition. Furthermore, it was full of fake signatures (Geri Halliwell? John Grisham? PERRY MASON?!). FURTHERMORE, 13,000 of the 30,000 signatories only had bachelor's degrees or equivalent.

Anonymous (November 23, 2008 @ 6:04pm):

I am idiot who makes rediculous anonymous comments on a college newspaper online board. I am horribly naieve and buy into every single conspiracy theory. I do not read into or research my political views, I simply take a stance that appears controversial so that I can stand on a soap box and spout ignorance masked in self-righetousess. For some reason I believe that I have some knowledge that no one else does (I guess these would be the Poly Sci (sp?) majors I always castigate) but in reality I just read these rediculous online sites that claim to convey the real "truth" as opposed to the clearly biased, washed-down, and corruptingly evil Mainstream Media. In fact, just saying the MSM sends chills down my spine.

But for now Ill return to my less than adequate life and continue to lay claim to being the only purveyer of truth while cowardly hiding behind anonymity with a name that translates to "I remain unconquered" when in reality "I remain ignorant" and "I remain anonymous."

Invictus Maneo

Anonymous (November 23, 2008 @ 6:43pm):

Anon-i-mouse 10:50am,

The spokesperson for the National Academy of Science disagreed with the conclusions of the Oregon petition, stating "The petition does not reflect the conclusions of expert reports of the Academy." There was no poll of Academy members performed to reach that conclusion, though. That in no way changes the fact that the Oregon Petition reflects the conclusions of 31,000 independent US researchers and scientists (read: Not dependent on funding from proponents of Man Made Global Warming). It also emphatically demonstrates that there is NO consensus on the tragicly flawed hypothesis of Man Made Global warming.

As for your assertion that the petition was "full of fake signatures", site your source and statistics. Are you certain there is only ONE John Grisham or Perry Mason in the entire US of A? A quick nationwide People Search will dissuade you of those fallacies.

FURTHERMORE, achieving a Bachelors of Science degree confers on the recipient the Title of Scientist. Masters and PhDs of Science are just sweeter icing on the Scientists layer cake.

Did the Democrat led destruction of a once well regulated home mortgage lending system aid and abet the world wide recession triggered by high energy prices? You bet it did! Flawed social engineering policies promulgated by liberal democrats and socialists constrained our domestic energy production for decades. Their simultaneous deregulation of what had been conservative mortgage lending requirements (a job, 20% down, little additional debt)led to speculative, unrestrained borrowing, ridiculous home pricing, and unsustainable loan repayments.

All the way along, the liberals kept asserting that it was "essential to assist the poor citizens in achieving the American Dream of home ownership". Demogoguery and duplicity at its finest!

"As ye sow, so shall ye reap!" It's a fine harvest we're having this fall, thanks to decades of democrat demogoguery, deception, and denial. It clearly demonstrates that at least 52% of Americans are indeed idiots, as demonstrated by the most recent election results.

Invictus Maneo

Anonymous (November 23, 2008 @ 8:08pm):

A BS make you into a Scientist?

That's some REALLY fine BS ya got there nimrod.

Anonymous (November 23, 2008 @ 8:51pm):

Hey there 10:50, at least one other person thinks you are wrong.

***

Subprime mortgages are a problem but they are not the cause of the collapse. The collapse was caused by an OPEC generated precipitous rise in oil prices. Subprime mortgage buyers could no longer pay their mortgages because too much of their pay check had to go to pay for gasoline. Yes, I know, gas prices have since declined but not before Humpty Dumpty, the American consumer, was broken.

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/57356.html

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.

Login...



   Remember me


Not registered? Sign up now.

It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.

...or Post Your Comment Anonymously

Anonymous

Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!

DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!

Place a classified ad

Advertising