Opinion: Letter
Herald wrong on ASM
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Clegg absurd, biased on CFACT (May 5, 2009)
- Fund peer tutors (April 28, 2009)
- UW policy consistent with nation (April 23, 2009)
- Biddy's initiative not worth it (April 20, 2009)
- A plan for better advising (April 20, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
On Monday, The Badger Herald Editorial Board called for changes to the timeline set forth by the Associated Students of Madison Constitutional Committee regarding its constitutional revision process. “In an ideal world,” the editorial states, “we’d like to see this come to a vote at the end of November.” After outlining a rough one-month plan for executing the closing stages of the reform process, it concludes by arguing that ASM must swiftly “finish the document” if it hopes to regain any semblance of legitimacy.
The board’s recommendation is both naive and dangerous. First, ASM extended its timeline in order to solicit widespread input and feedback from stakeholders within and outside student government. As the initial round of listening sessions comes to an end, we have a wealth of information that the committee will systematically process in order to make revisions to the draft constitution. This is the most critical stage since our work began in June, and any attempt to rush through revisions not only does a complete disservice to every student on this campus but also serves to undermine the legitimacy of these reform efforts.
Second, the worst thing ASM could do right now is place constitutional changes before the student body that have not undergone a comprehensive vetting process. Any premature approval of this governing document could very well leave student government in a dangerously precarious position. Students are awaiting a structure that better serves their interests and needs, not one that perpetuates the same problems, albeit under a new government.
Lastly, ASM has been criticized in the past for not actively seeking input on any number of its initiatives. If there is one student government “project” that warrants the involvement of the student body, I certainly hope it would be the creation of a new constitution. For a paper that never fails to rip ASM for lacking foresight, it’s rather ironic that the Herald is encouraging a quick conclusion to a process that will affect the lives of students for some time to come.
Jeff Wright
Chair, ASM Constitutional Committee
3 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
It’s not a matter of not seeking input, Jeff, it’s that nobody cares. At least not until the changes are made and people see what a disaster a self-important president and ‘her’ cabinet can wreak on the rest of us.
Put your energy into stopping the Union South demolition and restricting that project to only bringing the MU up to code. You will save students millions and THEN they will take you seriously.
Keep ASM grassroots — changing it to a top-down organization is a huge mistake — we already have a UW administration that does that and it doesn’t work well for students.
We…don’t….care…
ASM — blowing smoke up your ass for God only knows how many years!