Opinion
GOP suppressing vote in Wisconsin
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Alec Slocum:
- Making the case for Gov. Barrett (November 3, 2009)
- Wisconsin Innocence Project laudable (October 20, 2009)
- Sobering student accounts demand action on bar raids (October 5, 2009)
- Random Yale violence nothing new (September 21, 2009)
- Unfair or not, personal choice key to solving obesity (September 7, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen spoke on the importance of preventing voter fraud: “We are out there front and center everyday … doing what we can to make sure that those people who have illegally and illegitimately registered to vote don’t have the opportunity on election day to show up and take away your vote by casting one that is not legal.”
He is right. It is important that our democratic process operates accurately and without corruption. The problem is that suing the Government Accountability Board to have it retroactively cross-check 241,000 newly registered voters in a grossly deficient manner is one of the best ways to ensure the opposite.
It is quite easy to find op-eds and political speeches that decry the substantial harm fraudulent registration and voting does to the election process. Among Republicans it is even an “article of religious faith that voter fraud is causing us to lose elections,” according to the former political director of the Republican Party of Texas, Royal Masset. But apart from rare and isolated news alerts concerning alleged voter fraud, there are very few sources recounting substantiated instances and evidence of fraudulent voting.
An authoritative and highly regarded report was published on the subject by the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University Law School. Featured prominently in the report were the results of the Wisconsin 2004 presidential election. If voter fraud is truly a problem in our state it would have been prominent in a general election such as the one in ‘04, considering how closely predicted and contested our state was. However, what the results of the study suggest is that we are picking a fight with an imaginary enemy.
Votes cast by individuals in the name of deceased people, convicted felons, double voters and people voting under aliases are the source of substantial voter fraud right? Wrong. In fact, out of almost exactly three million total votes cast in the 2004 presidential election in the state, there were — count them — 7 substantiated cases of individuals knowingly casting fraudulent votes, amounting to a rate of .0002%. This rarity should be expected, considering the severity of the possible punishment — five years in prison and a $10,000 fine — and the measly nature of the payoff, one extra vote in a sea of nearly three million.
But what about fraudulent registrations sent by mail; that’s what this lawsuit is really about, right? Assuming mail fraud is actually what this lawsuit is about, which I am skeptical of, there were — hold on to your seats — four individuals who allegedly submitted false registration forms prior to the 2004 presidential election. None of these registrants were allowed to vote on Election Day.
These numbers obviously represent a miniscule and virtually irrelevant effect on an election, but why not enforce the act for this election anyway and attempt to eliminate absolutely all voter fraud? I would be inclined to agree, except that in the process of attempting to curb all alleged voter fraud by retroactively enforcing the Help America Vote Act, more harm is done to the accuracy and efficiency of our democratic process than good. Verifying these newly registered voters places an undue burden on those who need it the least — people who registered for the February Democratic primary in urban centers such as Milwaukee, where having to re-register or verify identification at polling places on Election Day could cause serious problems.
Hence the recent interventions of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and a Milwaukee teachers’ union become evident. Most of these urban, newly registered voters are people of color, of which roughly 50 percent do not have driver license records to check. This leaves only their social security information to verify their registration with, which is shown to fail at an impeccable rate of 25 percent. So about a quarter of newly registered black voters will be asked to re-register at the polls — causing massive backup at urban polling sites. This will come on an Election Day that promises a record-breaking turnout with discouragingly long lines. All of this congestion and confusion will undoubtedly result in people deciding to stay home, leave the polling location once they see the line or have waited in it for an hour or more generally disenfranchise a substantial portion of voters.
Given all of this, the fundamental question becomes: If there is no real threat of voter fraud, and the national interest in accommodating and encouraging as many voters as possible on Election Day is being compromised, why would our state’s attorney general be so interested in this lawsuit? Though many may disagree, it is not that old J.B. is just uninformed and lacking intelligence. Nor is it that he intentionally wants to disenfranchise strongly democratic voters in urban areas. The reason he is pressing this lawsuit is because John McCain’s presidential campaign wants to disenfranchise strongly democratic voters in urban areas, and Van Hollen just so happens to be the co-chair of their campaign in Wisconsin. If you are skeptical of that claim, consider the fact that McCain is opposed by a campaign that has been incredibly successful at registering new voters, largely in urban areas, as a central premise of their political strategy to win in November. It only makes sense that the McCain camp would want to thwart that effort. This is, after all, presidential politics, and worse has happened in presidential politics. Further proof rests in the McCain campaign’s interest in focusing on ACORN, a community organization, which has been accused of engaging in fraudulent voting practices. Although we can’t really blame the McCain campaign for wanting to frustrate the strategy of the campaign it opposes, even if it means opposing the improvement of the fabric of our democracy, we can certainly blame Van Hollen for abusing the powers of his office and subordinating his responsibilities to the citizenry of the state of Wisconsin in order to achieve partisan gain. In my estimation, this is the only conclusion to draw from the pursuit of an enemy who is utterly imaginary.
12 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Fans of Waits will not be disappointed
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
SPRING SUBLET: 1 bedroom in 2 bedroom at the Aberdeen. Rent negotiable. Email arkramer@wisc.edu
GENTLE WOMEN...THROUGH the lens of Douglas J. Nesbit, newly released book now available for holiday gifts! www.gentlewomen.us
IP hash: daf1d8c6
“Although we can’t really blame the McCain campaign for wanting to frustrate the strategy of the campaign it opposes, even if it means opposing the improvement of the fabric of our democracy…”
Whaaa? You can’t blame that? Oh, well then, democracy is just one more trivial impediment to a spirited campaign, I suppose.
IP hash: b1f23a6a
Diebold, my friends, Diebold.
IP hash: 2c182a1b
The problem is that prosecutors are afraid to prosecute voting fraud cases when the evidence points towards voting fraud. It is documented with ACORN facing serious charges in other states.
This is a fact you should consider before condemming one of the best attorney generals who has done more for Wisconsin in a short time over 14 plus years of democrat mismangement under doyle-lautenschlager at the Department of Justice.
IP hash: 4f9e28cd
Alec, you can’t just hold Republicans responsible for suppressing votes. Democrats get the itch sometimes too. Anyone who’s lived long enough to vote in at least a dozen national elections has witnessed at least one instance of voter fraud.
IP hash: 34f51f46
Are these the “activist judges” I often hear the Right complaining about?
IP hash: 077fc5f1
The Van Hollen lawsuit asks only that Wisconsin comply with federal election law, particularly HAVA. It is of utmost importance to election officials to have accurate records of the people who intend to vote. That is what the lawsuit intends to achieve. To assume that the lawsuit aims to disenfranchise Democratic voters is kind of a baseless assumption.
IP hash: 34f51f46
You assume that our government wants us to vote. Maybe we ARE too stupid to know what’s good for us.
IP hash: a38eaa3e
John, I did not mean that we can not condemn the McCain campaign for its irresponsible actions. I used blame in the sense that we can not blame the McCain campaign for subverting the importance of an improved democracy in order to win in the same way that you can not blame a lion for attacking a human. It appears to be in their nature, hence the rise of Sarah Palin.
I find it completely justified to condemn the actions of an attorney general who subverts their responsibilities for unethical partisan gain, regardless of their past record.
I am not stating or insinuating that all voter suppression has occurred at the hands Republicans. I am merely stating that in this rather important case, they are to blame.
Harold, that claim is not baseless because there is very little to no reason such importance should be placed on retroactively applying HAVA. That is why I cited the Brennan Center’s report.
IP hash: 2ec8a8a7
. It is documented with ACORN facing serious charges in other states.
ACORN workers getting fake names on their voter reg. sheets is about the same as making up addresses for a petition. The incentive is there, because it makes the collector some money, but as far as I know no one named “Mickey Mouse” lives at 123 Main Street, so that same Mickey Mouse will not actually get to vote in an actual election and in the case of a petition, the validity of the petition will be called into question (as it was when Young Political Majors, working with the California GOP collected fake petition signatures which were really forms to switch parties).
IP hash: 213641d5
Better winning through vote fraud.
It’s the Chicago Way.
IP hash: 1461aaad
I googled ‘Wisconsin Voter Fraud’. The first hits found listed the stories shown below from the Journal Sentinel of all places. I’ve heard accusations of GOP voter suppression and claims of few, if any, cases of false voters showing up at the polls. This insults me as I am the one being disenfranchised. My vote has effectively been ‘suppressed’
“Inquiry finds evidence of fraud in election Cast ballots outnumber voters by 4,609” http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=324933
“Some sites show huge vote gaps 17 wards have at least 100 more votes than voters; 2 miss by over 500” http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=298205
IP hash: d9ef91da
Here’s the real news story…
Headline: “GOP Suppressing Vote in Wisconsin” Opening Paragraph: “WI Attorney General (R)Working to prevent voter fraud.”
You’d think something like preventing voter fraud would be a bi-partisan issue… except for far left leaning mindsets who feel it’s disenfranchising those voting illegally because they statistically vote Democratic.
Go figure.