Opinion
Sarah Palin: damned if you do
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Sean Kittridge:
- Sanford and the art of lazy lying (June 26, 2009)
- Wisconsin budget follies induce flailing, head-shaking (June 18, 2009)
- Wiscard good for UW's funds, bad for students' (June 13, 2009)
- Scared straight: Use fear to force police into enforcement equality (June 5, 2009)
- Selig sets horrific example for undergraduates (May 5, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Politicians and Saturday Night Live have an incredible amount in common. Much like your typical senator, SNL is long past its prime, surviving more on reputation than actual accomplishments. And just like a weekly TV show with long, erectile dysfunction ad-riddled commercial breaks, ugly corporate interests often prop up elected officials. But more than anything, the great link between the two is their ability to take something noteworthy and drive it into the ground like John Henry to a railroad spike.
For the presidential candidates, this repetition can be found in negative advertising. Apparently, John McCain voted with George Bush quite a few times. Thank you, Barack Obama. That was quite the revelation, oh, last year. But for SNL, this defining characteristic can be found in every remotely funny sketch they’ve ever produced — and a number of Will Ferrell-related unfunny ones. Of recent note is Tina Fey’s portrayal of Sarah Palin, which drew an incredible amount of publicity despite no one watching the show anymore. This sudden surge in popularity prompted SNL writers to pen a second, also funny Sarah Palin sketch the very next week. And again the next week. And then the following Thursday. And Saturday. The act quickly grew so tiresome that there was only one way to further ruin it, and that was the route they chose.
They put Sarah Palin on SNL. They did the one thing every knowledgeable Republican in this country fears; they gave a conversationally-challenged, gun-slinging, soon-to-be 44-year-old grandmother/vice presidential candidate poorly scripted airtime on live TV. Forget that the last funny Republican was Chevy Chase’s classic slapstick Gerald Ford routine: There was no way putting Sarah Palin on this show could help her stock. Yet Saturday night came and went, and the four horsemen were nowhere to be found. Sarah Palin and the Republican Party avoided potential disaster by letting the VP candidate do what she’s always done: nothing.
She was totally unnecessary to the broadcast. In two skits, she made zero jokes, contributing nothing to the show beyond her presence, which, at this point, doesn’t pull her too far. It was the epitome of a Republican attempt at humor. Sit and gnash the teeth while surrounded by those liberal entertainment types, then leave and talk about how much fun you had. But suddenly, every right-winger in the United States was a huge Saturday Night Live fan, because Sarah Palin stuck it to the left’s brand of humor by passively appearing on screen.
But back to Republicans, Saturday Night Live and the gift of driving talking points off a cliff. There is a tightly-contested senate race in Minnesota between the incumbent Republican Norm Coleman and the new Democratic candidate Al Franken. Like Sarah Palin, Franken appeared on SNL. Unlike her, he actually contributed to the show, writing many of the show’s political pieces and contributing characters like Stuart Smalley. According to the GOP, Sarah Palin is fit to potentially hold the highest office in the nation, and little stunts like this only aid the claim. But this same party is lambasting voters on how unfit Franken is for a senate seat because of these very associations. This is a point Coleman has run with since Franken candidacy grumblings started several years ago, and yet the very program that makes his opponent a joke should allow the American people to take a possible vice president seriously.
It’s hard to tell if this is a consistency flaw yet, but it’s hard to imagine a Republican senator coming out in criticism of his party’s VP pick two weeks before an election. If it is, Norm Coleman is, like most politicians, a hypocrite. And although hypocrisy in Washington is about as shocking as an Andy Dick arrest, the people of Minnesota can do something about it. They can vote. Just like we all can vote to put the right people into office. Republicans love to criticize the liberal media and the New York Times yet have no problem going to Ground Zero for photo ops or appearing on TV shows when it serves their interests. And just as a friendly reminder, because it can get confusing, Saturday Night Live is on NBC, not C-SPAN.
Sean Kittridge (kittridge@wisc.edu) is a junior majoring in journalism.
16 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
What’s your point?
Yeah, where’s your conclusion? Sarah Palin was a prop and this linked to Norm Coleman how?
P.S. Will Farrell’s George W. Bush still makes me laugh. You must be without a soul.
And the moral of the story is: Sean Kittridge does not like like Sarah Palin.
Wow, this column was really bad. I want my five minutes back.
“And the moral of the story is: Sean Kittridge does not like like Sarah Palin.”
Are you sure? He might be a Republican due to his amazing open-mindedness regarding negative ads coming from both sides. Did you see how he completely bashed Obama in that half sentence earlier in the diatribe?
his point is attempting to sway MN kid voters to not back coleman… but has no conclusion so it’s kinda confusing. dig.
This article is a piece of trash, dude. The editors must have been lacking content.
SNL still entertaining but not new or fresh. Sean Kittridge still dumbass but not new or fresh. what a stupid article to waste time on
This was just a dirty mud sling piece against Will Ferrell.
I dont get the point of this article. What are your trying to prove?
If Barack Obama had appeared on SNL, the tone of this story would have been different. It would have read something to the effect,”Obama and his coolness put SNL back on map.”
like everyone else said…what is the point of this article?
Badger Herald contributors, REALLY? Really, you can’t find anything interesting to form an opinion about? If you say something ridiculous, you’ll get slammed by the comment board. If you write it well, however, we’ll respect your craft.
Can any of you really say that Sarah Palin added anything to SNL last week? She made small talk with lorne michaels, she pretended to be tina fey and took no questions, she was on the set of weekly update and threw her hands around in the air while amy poehler did an awesome rap.
She was useless on the show and provided nothing funny.
That said, when Barack appeared on SNL, he wasn’t funny either. Maybe SNL just has horrible writers and doesn’t know how to include politicians in their show.
Where did BH find this pizza-faced mouth breather?
On a positive note, thanks to the editors for NOT publishing his zit-riddled portrait this week.
@ 4:26, ROFL! Shit, that was terrible. But hilarious!
As for the article - WILL FERRELL ‘08.
Sop it up wit a biscuit, bitch.