Opinion: Letter
ASM sunk in political science sandbox
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Clegg absurd, biased on CFACT (May 5, 2009)
- Fund peer tutors (April 28, 2009)
- UW policy consistent with nation (April 23, 2009)
- Biddy's initiative not worth it (April 20, 2009)
- A plan for better advising (April 20, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
In its new constitution, the Associated Students of Madison proposes to throw out the current system of representation and replace it with the “Galactic Empire” of student government. The entire document feels as if it were written by a political science major with a pocket constitution and severe delusions of grandeur. (I should know; I am one.)
Let’s face facts: ASM should operate as the voice of the students of UW-Madison and it claims to do so. However, ASM is so unimportant to the average UW student that most aren’t aware they’re part of the group. As it is, most students see ASM as a free bus pass and a bunch of snobby poli-sci majors “playing government” with their segregated fees. This is the real issue that ASM must solve.
I hate to sound like Ronald Reagan, but the proposed bigger government isn’t the solution. Entrusting a president with expansive veto power, creating an executive cabinet and turning the Student Council into a vast oversight committee is the wrong idea. It is simply providing more evidence to the 94 percent of students who feel that it’s not worth spending five minutes voting for their representatives from the comfort of their laptops.
Rather than restructuring itself, ASM should focus instead on becoming a more representative organization by using its current structure more effectively. By making the students of Madison feel they really are part of ASM, ASM could increase its legitimacy and make real changes that help UW’s students. I propose the following changes:
ASM should expand the current Legislative Affairs Committee and make its members directly elected rather than volunteers.
Stricter standards for constituent contact should be set for members of the Student Council. A new committee focusing solely on learning the issues important to the students of UW should be established. Surveys should be conducted. Real, genuine, person-to-person contact rather than a questionnaire buried among The Badger Beat, JSM advertisements and yet another e-mail from David Plouffe urging you to send Barack more cash. If ASM doesn’t address its constituent problem soon, history may repeat itself on the UW campus. As our founding fathers taught us, a government that does not represent its constituents cannot stand. Or, in ASM’s case, it may slowly fade into irrelevance.
Tyler Junger
Student Services Finance Committee candidate
sophomore, political science
tjunger@wisc.edu
3 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
521 W Dayton 4BR/2BA. Marble showers, dishwasher, completely updated! madisoncampusrentals.com
1, 2, or 3 bedroom apartment available for spring 2010. meltzer@wisc.edu if you are interested!
I speak from experience when I say that SSFC members are by far the most experienced people to be dictating what ASM committees like Leg. Affairs should or shouldn’t be doing. SSFC and Finance Committee members are so intimately involved in the grassroots organizing aspect of ASM, I would totally never doubt what a current candidate for office would have to say about this. Mr. Junger clearly has years of experience working with and observing the work of ASM’s interns and volunteers and knows best how to criticize them, and totally not for political gain or anything. - Germain Q. Stemme
Germain-
You understand that sarcasm is only funny when it is cleaver. Sardonic diatribes about your resentment for life does not constitute productive discourse.
Who cares if the kid is running for SSFC. He is a member of the student body, which makes his concerns as legitimate as yours.
I think the entire point is that you do not need years of experience with ASM to have thoughts about the restructuring. I certainly have never heard of a Germain Q. Stemme participating in Student Government. I know Germain E. (the original Stemme), but he was able to make a positive contribution.
Alex Gallagher
why you have to go bashing reagan like that?