Opinion
Sept. 11 stunt at La Crosse a sham
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Sam Clegg:
- Lunch trays signal end of America (April 30, 2009)
- SSFC right on; ASM muddles on as year ends (April 28, 2009)
- Far left coalition shattered from Monona to Mendota (April 21, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Whatever one thinks of the attacks that took place Sept. 11, it is impossible to deny Osama Bin Laden’s colossal act of destruction created a delicious ideological pie.
Socialists and libertarians claim it was the result of an invasive foreign policy bent on domination. Republicans, ironically enough, claim it was an incipient hatred of freedom that triggered the attacks. Democrats, meanwhile, are busy exclaiming masturbatory high fives over the fact that they retook Congress in 2006, two years ago.
But perhaps no one has taken greater advantage of the events on Sept. 11 than University of Wisconsin-La Crosse’s own College Republicans. Using their exclusive monopoly on patriotism to appoint themselves the hosts of this year’s commemorative ceremonies, La Crosse’s CRs planted — Surprise! — 3,000 flags on a campus field.
But knowing that a host of other organizations had presumably done the same, they decided to innovate — by making some of the flags into the shape of a cross.
In doing so, the College Republicans of La Crosse did several things. Most visibly, they sparked the bureaucratic ire of the university, whose student coordinator asked the group to rearrange the cross in response to a number of complaints from students on campus.
But the gravest side-effect of their move stemmed from an implicit denial that individuals of any faith other than Christianity had died in the attacks.
Andy Matz, chair of La Crosse’s College Republicans, argued the flags were “a memorial to the nearly 3,000 Americans who were murdered that day.” He added, “We weren’t trying to promote Christianity.”
From the organization that seems to be the most concerned with reminding the nation of the historical and moral significance of the attacks, it is an astounding lapse of historical understanding to omit that the sole premise behind the attacks was centered on religion.
And therein lies the appalling specter of self-interest for the College Republicans. Sept.11 has been packaged repeatedly for different political causes, and egregious manipulation has turned the event into a modernized Remember the Alamo, accompanied by all the attendant rejection of moderate appeals to understand its historical relevance or, for that matter, an objective interpretation of the events themselves. And the placing of a bunch of flags — each of which was intended to represent a dead American — to resemble a cross is no different. It would be intuitively counterproductive for the Republicans to arrange the flags into a Star of David or a Crescent Moon — not because innocent Jews, Muslims and Hindus did not die in the collapse of the twin towers, but because they are not the individuals who compose either the vast majority of the Republican Party’s membership or the segment of the population to which its most fervent appeals are directed.
Etched into my memories of Sept. 11 are the speeches I heard from a number of people I had been conditioned to respect in this country, praying that from the rubble of a dream undone, we could forget our differences — or at least put them in perspective. But that’s obviously much too inconvenient for the College Republicans at La Crosse. It’s much easier to create memorials that, on a fundamental level, deny that difference even exists. After all — there were the Christians who died, and then there was everybody else.
Next year, if students at La Crosse decide that a visible reminder of the very brutal toll taken by the attacks is desirable, I encourage other, less reprehensible organizations to throw themselves into the annual menagerie of patriotic showmanship. Perhaps they do not believe such a display is essential to their respect for the thousands who died on that day, but they should do it anyway — if not out of a genuine desire to “prove” they remember, then out of an acceptance that “sharing” our anguish is the only way to prevent its perversion.
Sam Clegg (sclegg@badgerherald.com) is a sophomore majoring in economics and French.
9 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
President’s Visit Marked a Speech to One of the Last Groups Not Critical of Him
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Enough is enough! Shame on the Badger Herald for kow-towing to the ever expanding pro-vampire, anti-cruciform radical minority! If you can’t stand behind the UW-L CR’s brilliant merger of patriotism and blood-sucking demon repellent, I don’t know WHAT the Badger Herald stands for! - Germain Q. Stemme
Great article, Sam.
“claim it was an incipient hatred of freedom that triggered the attacks.”
I’d say that was correct just based on what OBL has written and said.
Nothing is quite so (how’d you put it?) “delicious” as being smug about the suffering of others.
You are one sick little puke, Sam. Now do humanity a favor and remove yourself from the gene pool.
Your parents must be so proud.
I wasn’t aware that these UW LaCrosse students planted 3000 flags - some of them in the shape of a cross. That’s great!
“Democrats, meanwhile, are busy exclaiming masturbatory high fives over the fact that they retook Congress in 2006, two years ago.”
What on Earth did this have to do with the sentences before it, or the Democrats’ response to the 9/11 attacks in general?
Dear 4:06,
Can you read? One of the main premises of the article criticized the use of September 11th to pander to a political base. Hello?
Sam, if you do decide to remove yourself from the gene pool (which I hope you don’t, but I’m all for the right of individual choice), I do hope you’ll consider impregnating me first.
Reading this article was the biggest waste of my time, even overtaking the minute I took to read the review of Allen Iverson’s rap album.
Not only was this poorly written, but completely unwarranted.
I’m an atheist, and a Democrat for that matter, but this was just silly. Stop disgracing us Dems with pathetic slander like this.
So Christians enjoy holding memorial services and donating over $50 billion a year to various religious charities. Get over it!
To quote the great Shooter McGavin’
“Go back to your shanty”
idiotarian @ 11:00pm whined: “Can you read? One of the main premises of the article criticized the use of September 11th to pander to a political base. Hello?”
That’s absolutely no justification for Sam’s apparent frission of pleasure (schadenfreude) over the suffering of others. Normal folks find nothing “delicious” about the 9/11 attacks. And stylishly sneering about it doesn’t make that behavior less disgusting with the passage of time.
And those who share Sam’s sentiment should also consider doing the world a favor and removing their monumental stupidity from the global gene pool. Do it for Gaia, won’t you?