Opinion: Editorial
Hold it
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:
- The Invisible Man Award: Wyndham Manning (May 7, 2009)
- The People's Choice Award: Jacqueline Hitchon et. al (May 7, 2009)
- The Lifetime Achievement Award: ASM (May 7, 2009)
- Honest representation (May 5, 2009)
- Junger for ASM Chair (May 5, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Ald. Brenda Konkel, District 2, plans to propose an ordinance this October that would decriminalize urinating in public property — namely in parks — for Madison’s homeless population. Two accompanying proposals aim to protect the property of the homeless and their right to sleep in public locations.
According to Konkel, these measures will save taxpayers money because the homeless will no longer be forced to spend time in jail after being unable to pay their fines for committing these acts. Fundamentally, however, Konkel told the Herald these ordinances are simply intended to protect the homeless population’s “life-sustaining processes.”
Konkel’s proposal comes in response to the recently proposed 2009 Madison budget, which has failed to create room for any new programs to assist the homeless. Concerns over homeless rights have also been raised at a time when the transient population has been under considerable scrutiny after the murder of University of Wisconsin student Brittany Zimmermann.
While we sympathize with the homeless population, we find Konkel’s proposal to decriminalize public urination not only a gross misstep in regards to public health and sanitation but also unfairly and illegally excludes one group from a law by which others must abide.
Because it may also be difficult to physically identify a member of the homeless community from other citizens for whom this ordinance may not apply, this has the potential to open the floodgates for everyone to relieve themselves in public. And let us not forget, for one day every August, thousands of students are flushed out of their apartments and become temporarily “homeless.”
We are not — dare we say it — pissed off about Konkel’s proposal, but this ordinance doesn’t quite go with the flow. Perhaps, if finding adequate restrooms is a concern, the city should make these facilities more readily available rather than approve frivolous proposals destined to go down the toilet.
4 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
President’s Visit Marked a Speech to One of the Last Groups Not Critical of Him
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Animals urinate in public. People are just animals. Quit being so self righteous.
“We find Konkel’s proposal to decriminalize public urination not only a gross misstep in regards to public health and sanitation but also unfairly and illegally excludes one group from a law by which others must abide.”
You may think there’s only one really bad error in this sentence, but you’d be wrong! Who can find them all?!
And while this editorial is dead right, it’s a bit hypocritical to chastise Konkel for a “frivolous” proposal to help the homeless. When has the Herald ever cared about something that doesn’t involve alcohol, easy solutions, or proposals that can be skewered with copious punning?
What if I’m just temorarily homeless, like at bar time, before I get home? Can I pee in the street then?