Opinion: Letter
Williams wrong to stereotype, speculate
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Clegg absurd, biased on CFACT (May 5, 2009)
- Fund peer tutors (April 28, 2009)
- UW policy consistent with nation (April 23, 2009)
- Biddy's initiative not worth it (April 20, 2009)
- A plan for better advising (April 20, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Dear Badger Herald:
I read Tim Williams’ article today (“Bull won’t stop fraternity foibles”) and do appreciate many of the points he made regarding fraternity life. This is certainly a time for self reflection for many fraternities and fraternity members and I hope that they all learn from this.
I truly agree that there is a double standard between typical fraternity “values” and what is often seen in news articles, the court of public opinion, and, unfortunately, random passerby who see things like the incident at SigEp and make their own judgments. And Tim is right, incidents like these are fuel for the eager cynic’s fire. But do you really think that the majority of fraternity members are truly any different than the average campus male? The fraternity system is (contrary to popular belief) actually quite diverse. There are large houses, smaller houses, houses focused around a particular college major, religious affiliated houses, African American houses, etc. It seems to me that the fraternity population is probably quite representative of the average population of UW-Madison. I suppose student orgs should be held to a higher standard than a group of friends living on Mifflin St., but it doesn’t make it acceptable to imply that fraternity members are for some reason “worse” than the rest of the campus.
Also, I think Tim stepped out of bounds when he implied that he knew anything about the “hell week” of the fraternity. This is an ‘Animal House’ stereotype in the purest form and he, like many other students, succumbed to it. Shame on you for implying that this fraternity hazes, you have no idea what goes on there. Hazing is a very serious matter, and because of that, not a matter of speculation.
And finally, why does everyone care so much? If this is determined to be hazing by the many governing bodies that are investigating (and believe me, there will be MANY), then please feel free to publish your articles and opinions, and damn SigEp as much as you want. They would deserve it; as I said before hazing is unacceptable and illegal. But in the mean time, Tim implied that this may simply have been a disgusting act conducted in a fraternity front yard. Is this news? Is this anyone’s business? If you are simply disgusted by this type of act, then should we also ban dunk tanks at work picnics where employees can get “revenge” on their bosses? Or should we ban the crew team from throwing the coxswain in the lake after winning a regatta?
Badger Herald, please do not continue to spread stereotypes and discrimination. Had this incidence occurred by a group of friends in any house on Langdon other than a fraternity house, you would not have published this article. You would not be “disgusted” by the act. But I bet you would still have the same fraternity stereotypes in your head that you have now.
Luke Behnke ‘04
Sigma Phi Epsilon Alumni
7 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
couldn’t have summed this up better myself
Preach on Luke… preach on.
Too bad this level-headed argument won’t be published on the front page, where it deserves to go.
Nice job Luke.
well said sir
spoken like a douche with plaid shorts, two polo shirts with flipped up collars, aviator sunglasses, and a backwards upside down visor. But there is an element of truth to every sterotype, right?
One minor quibble: “The fraternity system is (contrary to popular belief) actually quite diverse. There are large houses, smaller houses, houses focused around a particular college major, religious affiliated houses, African American houses, etc”
Where are the Af-Am houses? I do not see them. Oh, I wonder why…