OPINION & EDITORIAL
Wright rerun fault of media
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Andy Granias:
- Which right is right on drugs? (April 24, 2008)
- McCain relies on old fiscal failures (April 17, 2008)
- High court election could be worse (April 3, 2008)
- Oh, look how they've grown! (March 27, 2008)
- Why do political wives stand by? (March 13, 2008)
Related Stories:
- Barack Obama secret Muslim; good for you, Hillary (April 29, 2008)
- Wright critics wrong on patriotism (March 24, 2008)
- Standing firm: Wright or wrong (March 26, 2008)
- Thank-you Badger Herald (September 6, 2001)
- Barack Obama: Political St. Nick (October 15, 2007)
Share This:
by Andy Granias
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Six weeks ago, Barack Obama made a monumental speech addressing race relations in America titled “A More Perfect Union.” He did so in the honest, straightforward demeanor that has hallmarked his candidacy for the highest office in the nation.
The catalyst for the speech was his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose name you have surely heard ad nauseam by now. Mr. Obama — who attended Mr. Wright’s church for 20 years, was married by him and had his two children baptized by him — did what any public figure would have done in the same situation: He denounced the statements made by Mr. Wright that he did not agree with. Among these was that America had a hand in starting the AIDS epidemic to kill blacks, and that Sept. 11 was an acceptable reaction to America’s own “terrorist” actions.
For a while, I was actually quite happy with Mr. Wright.
You see, I was naive enough to think Mr. Wright — regardless of how he did so — may have started a serious dialogue in mainstream America about an issue that isn’t always prevalent in the minds of mainstream Americans (by mainstream Americans, I mostly mean white people).
And when I watched Mr. Obama give that speech in response to Mr. Wright’s absurd claims, I was even more encouraged. Not only did Mr. Obama address the fears and concerns of minorities and the black community, he also addressed widespread resentment and anger among white communities. He seemed, for once, to get right the order of the horse and the cart by simply addressing the obvious.
As Mr. Obama said, “… race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Mr. Wright made in his offending sermons about America — to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.”
He did all of this in a manner that — while most self-righteous intellectuals would never admit to — was downright inspirational.
Yet only a month-and-a-half later, it seems as if all of that inspiration, all of that intellect and honesty, was all for naught. In the name of the modern individual and the almighty dollar that drives him, Mr. Wright has resurfaced thanks to his and the media’s rampant solipsism — titillating away all remnants of a progressive discussion.
And instead of pointing the finger inward, many in the media berated Mr. Obama for the rerun episode.
The New York Times said yesterday, “It took more time than it should have [for him to] firmly reject the racism and paranoia of his former pastor.” Likewise, The Washington Post said yesterday, “It seems to us that the whole sorry episode raises legitimate questions about [Mr. Obama’s] judgment.”
It’s as if, when Mr. Obama said in his speech in March that he “condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright,” mainstream America thought he must have meant to say “commend” instead because he did not damn to hell every fiber of Mr. Wright’s being.
So, what could Mr. Obama have said to keep Mr. Wright out of the public’s interest? Probably nothing.
But I guess I’ve learned this lesson before: We are a public that demands stimulation above sincerity, and a public that drives the media to abide by our drooling desires. In fact, my initial idea for this article was to vindictively rip John McCain for not fully rejecting the support of Rev. John C. Hagee — a bigot of equal proportions to Mr. Wright. But I understand John McCain is of proper distance to Mr. Hagee, just as Barack Obama is to Mr. Wright, and that enough is enough.
Many of us in the media are fond of saying that “words matter,” mostly because words are just about all we have. But there is a lesson to be taken from the narcissistic resurrection of Rev. Jeremiah Wright this week: It’s up to you to realize that the media — and all the words it can fashion — don’t always matter.
Fewer realizations are more vital toward actually achieving a more perfect union.
Andy Granias (agranias@badgerherald.com) is a junior majoring in political science and philosophy.
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 8:19am):
Nice attempt at rewriting history but six weeks isn't enough for folks to forget what happened in Philly.
Obama's speech in Philly (framed by all those magnificent patriotic flags!) took real balls. This political huckster got caught "ridin' dirty!" (in Wright's parlance) with an anti-American racial arsonist; and yet it turns out the only way to heal those racial wounds is.... to elect Barry Soetoro (aka, B. Hussein Mohammed Obama) President of the United States of America!
That was akin to OJ saying we could just get past all this double-murder decapitation fuss if we just appoint him California Attorney General.
Was the Obamessiah kinda-sorta suggesting that the key to racial reconciliation and healing our nation's wounds begins with an act of forgiveness almost transcendently spiritual in nature? And that that act of psuedo-divine forgiveness just happens to involve... forgiving Senator Barry Soetoro and his Jew-hatin' preacher?
I thought the Messiah was to forgive us our trespasses, not the other way around.
The kingdom of Heaven is at hand: All you need to do to enter is forgive. Forgiveness will turn the key to the gates.
Are you righteous enough in your hearts to attempt the audacity of forgiveness? Or are you a racist sinner stuck in the past?
Meanwhile, in an alternate universe, Alois Schicklgruber (aka, Adolph Hitler) has "distanced" himself from Josef Goebbels, telling German media that despite Goebbels' long-time position as Minister of Propaganda, the anti-semitic Goebbels "habt sprechen fur mich nicht" and that he no longer wants any questions about Goebbels' loose talk about a "Final Solution."
"Distance." That's all it takes. Run a poll, decide someone is now a political liability, cut him loose, and you hit the reset button. You are no longer answerable at all for the lack of "distance" -- nay, the very real political and spiritual closeness -- with a lunatic racist you cultivated all of your adult life.
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 9:24am):
"In Obama's eyes, the most serious wrongdoing in Wright's statements is their disrespect of Obama."
"The adolescent grandiosity and adolescent pettiness of Obama's remarks are perhaps the most shocking revelations of this entire episode."
Obama is channeling Urkel again - "Did I do that?"
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 9:29am):
What a bogus comparison. Did Hagee "bring McCain to Christ"? Did Hagee marry McCain or baptise his children? Did McCain sit thru 20 years of sermons or call Hagee his spiritual mentor?
And what a load of BS to say that the MSM is at fault - thay are all Obamamaniacs and give him love at every opportunity.
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 9:30am):
Obama's speech in Philly characterized Rev. Wright's statements as "controversial," which rather understated the matter. They were not "controversial." They were vicious and vile.
Madonna is "controversial," folks. Changing the opening theme to Monk was "controversial."
Wright's language was vicious and vile anti-Americanism and racism and anti-semitism. If those things were (to Obama) merely "controversial," it seems he needs a teachable moment or two, rather than presuming to fill us with "understanding."
But the fact is, Obama didn't even call Wright's remarks controversial. Obama played it even more cute than that. He said he heard things that "could be considered" controversial. He then spent the rest of his speech telling us that what we thought was controversial is explainable due to the history of racial tension in the United States.
Reposted below is the sermon delivered on Sunday, September 16, 2001. Firemen were still digging through skin-blistering ash in a futile effort to find more survivors of the 9/11 attacks. And putting their health at risk breathing heavily in air tainted with asbestos and toxins.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36T1fnIafC0
Now, once again: Watch Wright's relish -- his nearly orgasmic delight -- in saying "America's chickens... have come home... to roost." Watch this cocksucker dance and flutter his hands in a happy flourish as he celebrates and exults in the deaths of 3000 Americans and foreign nationals, all civilians and all innocents, as it represents a vindication of his sickening worldview and a well-deserved comeupppance for the nation he so deeply hates.
Now, as Obama's disgusting spiritual mentor and political guide is publicly celebrating the terrorism of 9/11 as blatantly as the Palestinian terrorists did that very day, and as excitedly as Al Qaeda does:
Was he saying in Philly that these comments are merely "controversial" or potentially "controversial"?
And now he'd like a second try at that?
Just how much "Hope" and "Change"-- or is it just "distance" now?-- must the Obamessiah deliver for his cultists to cancel out his voluntary, bear-hug embrace of this repellent American damning seditionist?
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 9:48am):
Hagee did not marry John McCain to his wife.
Hagee did not baptize McCain's children.
Hagee did not damn America from the pulpit.
McCain did not attend Hagee's church.
McCain did not call Hagee his "spiritual mentor."
Hagee was not even McCain's pastor. Ever.
Hagee is merely a distant political ally. The qualities of that political relationship do not compare to those of a deep spiritual mentor.
So sure... Hagee's a whackjob. Yet it is illogical to try to equate the two relationships once you objectively examine the facts.
I'm much more wary of someone like Obama who willingly exposed himself to 20 years of Wright's "liberation theology" than someone who is merely politically ruthless like McCain.
There are problems with McCain. But a McCain presidency would be less of mess than an Obama presidency. That doesn't make McCain a perfect presidential candidate. It merely makes him the best choice amongst bad apples.
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 10:00am):
Wow. Comparing Obama to Hitler (8:19).
I never thought I would see Reductio ad Hitlerum stretched out to such moronic proportions!
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 10:22am):
To 8:19am:
Congratulations. You must have been in the "gifted and talented" programs as a child. Did you always know you were destined for greatness? I mean, we have major cable news channels covering this election 24/7, and none of them picked up on this. Thank you for pointing out what everyone else has been missing this whole time.
I never thought I'd see the day when someone caught a politician being sneaky.
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 10:43am):
The problem for Obama is that his books do not, in fact, support the conclusion that he is entirely out of sympathy with what we now know to be Jeremiah Wright's noxious views. To be sure, Obama has never suggested that the federal government developed the AIDS virus. But Obama's own account of his first encounter with Wright's preaching, as related in his book Dreams From My Father, reveals that Obama knew of Wright's virulent racism from the beginning, and that it was a racist screed by Wright that initially drew Obama to his church. Listen to Obama himself tell the story in the audio book of Dreams From My Father, by clicking here.
It is hard to see how a candidate who finds inspirational the claim that "white folks' greed runs a world in need" can fully distance himself from Wright's anti-white racism.
PAUL adds: As I've written before, the common thread that ties Obama's views to Wright's is black liberation theology, which sees the Christian mission as bringing justice to oppressed people through political activism, and emphasizes the racial aspect of oppression. In effect, it is an amalgam of Christianity, radical left-wing ideology, and black militancy. Obama's autobiography supports my view that, in all likelihood, "only this brand [of Christianity] could [have brought] a left-wing political activist like Obama to Jesus."
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020411.php
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 10:49am):
Idiotarian @ 10:00am nattered: "Wow. Comparing Obama to Hitler"
Why not? Obama's only foreign policy experience (so far) was campaigning for his cousin Odinga (a convicted felon) in formerly stable Kenya-- even while Obama's Marxist revolutionary cousin had his Islamo-fascist political operatives busy raping and looting and burning black women and children alive in their church pews. Obama's new ally (his cousin, Prime Minister Odinga) has now displaced hundreds of thousands of refugees, burned crops to the point where Kenyans are starving and thoroughly destabilized a pro-Western ally bordered with Islamo-fascist Somalia.
http://www2.nysun.com/article/69273
This is how Marxist revolutionary national socialists (Nazis) behave. Own it.
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 10:59am):
Don't worry, the MSM will make it all better for BHO, one way or another.
***
The media continue their fascination with Obama, but this new religious stumble toward Obama's coronation clearly troubles them. Politicians bring religion into politics at their own peril. Yet somehow the media will spin it for Obama, and probably tie it to their belief that Obama was born in a manger.
It is funny to watch the press excuse the racist comments of blacks while they vilify the likes of David Duke. If Duke were a Democrat saying those things, they would excuse him as a sheet-wearing victim, a cute man with a pointy hat who is just a product of his upbringing. You know, like they have done for Sen. Robert Byrd. Byrd was a Klan organizer who was so far up in the hierarchy that he was issued a fitted sheet.
http://www.epaperedition.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=TmV3c0hlcmFsZC8yMDA4LzA1LzAxI0FyMDA3MDA=&Mode=HTML&Locale=english-skin-custom
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 12:03pm):
Idiotarian @ 10:00am sneered: "I never thought I would see Reductio ad Hitlerum stretched out to such moronic proportions!"
Because moronic Leftists have only been shrieking BusHitler (ad nauseum) for how long now?
http://www.zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
Anonymous (May 1, 2008 @ 9:37pm):
9:29- I hope Hagee didn't marry McCain, I thought that sort of thing was frowned upon by the Radical Right and Fundy Christians.
Wright was Right... just because it is so out of mainstream parlance (such as suggesting in any way that our own foreign policy decisions in the past were at least partially responsible for 9/11) doesn't make it wrong. He could have used more tact, but... he was right.
Anonymous (May 2, 2008 @ 7:35am):
Idiotarian @ 9:37pm spewed: "Wright was Right"
Here we have a perfect specimen of the vile, reprehensible and (sadly) typical insinuations of hate-America progressives in Obama's camp. Please, do continue. Americans need to know more about the Unholy Alliance between Isalmo-fascism and the American Left.
http://www.zombietime.com/iraq_war_fifth_anniversary_protest/obamarama/
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.





