OPINION & EDITORIAL
Granias takes liberties with liberty
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Granias takes liberties with liberty (April 28, 2008)
- Phansalkar's criticism suspect (April 24, 2008)
- Trovato shoots self in foot (April 24, 2008)
- Kittridge claims careless (April 17, 2008)
- True liberty for all knows no boundaries (April 15, 2008)
Related Stories:
- Tackling Taboos (December 3, 2007)
- Granias' pro-Woods bias obvious (February 23, 2007)
- Readers cry foul (April 18, 2008)
- Readers dispatch varmints (February 23, 2007)
- Readers slay Goliath with e-responses (April 25, 2008)
Share This:
by Letters to the Editor
Monday, April 28, 2008
In his opinion column last week, Andy Granias (“Which right is right on drugs?,” April 25) is correct in one sense when he says the concept of a right is inherently constructed, but his examples (intramarital rape, slavery) are faulty. We have rejected such activities as “rights” by extending rights to former slaves and women, not by narrowing our conception of personal liberties. So while we shouldn’t accept simplistic ideas of personal freedom, we should expect consistency in how those freedoms are applied. We, as a society, accept the right to privacy, and that right has guaranteed control over one’s own body, first by establishing a woman’s control over her reproductive choices and more recently by placing consenting adults’ sexual choices outside the purview of the law. A citizen is the master of her body and her bedroom; what that citizen does in the privacy of her home with consenting adults is nobody else’s business. What sense does it make that a woman decides what goes on in her uterus but a drug user shouldn’t choose what goes on in her nasal cavities? What sense does it make to allow citizens to have any sort of kinky sex they wish but to bust them for smoking pot in their bedroom?
Perhaps prohibition would be acceptable if it produced tangible benefits, but it has not. Mr. Granias correctly points out that the drug business supports violence and organized crime, but takes that as evidence of prohibition’s necessity and not of its futility. People often hear of drug violence, but why haven’t Absolut and Smirnoff killed for control over State Street? The reason is simple — by prohibiting drugs, we have surrendered control over how drugs are produced, sold and consumed. We gave a lucrative market directly to the black market and the unscrupulous thugs therein. As a result, drugs are easier for children to get than alcohol, their safety and potency is suspect and the money produced is hidden and untaxed.
Due to our punitive approach to drugs, drug addiction is more deadly and crippling than it would be otherwise. Drug prices are artificially inflated, forcing many addicts into debt and even prostitution or theft. Drug potency is not standardized, which leads to overdoses, the threat of legal consequences and societal stigma that makes the user vulnerable by pushing her away from seeking medical or legal help. Worse, prohibition does little to minimize drug use; studies find only weak links between the punishment attached to a drug and that drug’s usage rate. In Holland, legally sanctioned coffee shops sell marijuana to people over 18, yet the Netherlands has a low rate of marijuana usage and experienced only a temporary bump in usage following de facto legalization. Likewise, several U.S. states decriminalized marijuana without seeing any jump in usage rates, while states that passed stricter laws saw no decrease in drug use.
The problem is that our drug policies aren’t guided by pragmatism or compassion. Drug use is part of the culture war. Middle America associates drug use with segments of society it doesn’t like: stoners, leftists and minorities. We regard drug use as a question of personal sin, not public health. In order to stop this war against the drug-involved poor, we need to escape this paradigm. Addiction causes problems in communities, but we should react by offering help and compassion, not punishment and scorn. We need fewer prisons and more needle exchanges, better social programs and more treatment; less prohibition and more regulation; less black market control and more transparency. Drug addiction is a disease, not a sin, and you can’t wage a war on a disease unless you wage it on those who are afflicted.
Andrew Miller
akmiller@wisc.edu
Anonymous (April 28, 2008 @ 9:05am):
Hear him, hear him!
Anonymous (April 28, 2008 @ 9:12am):
I am presently being surveilled in my home and whereever I go by the local police. Do you have any comments on this. I know this because they harrass me almost every time I go out the front door.
Anonymous (April 28, 2008 @ 9:21am):
I think you nailed it Andrew. This comment comes from someone who has published more of the major research than anyone else in the world. Granias would get a failing grade in my class just on factual issues, never mind the arguments on which they are based. He goes from factually wrong assumptions to unwarranted conclusions. (For anyone who wants to take issue with this, please spend several weeks reading at http://druglibrary.org/schaffer before you do.)
Of course, I should state that this happens every time somebody tries to defend prohibition. So Granias did as well as anyone on his side. The best they can do is maybe get into the second round before the knockout happens. Then, from that point forward, debates for prohbitionists are just an invitation to an ass-whipping. They all have the same weaknesses -- no real knowledge of the subject coupled with illogical, often hysterical arguments. That stuff worked before the days of the internet. Not so much anymore.
One note, however. You should take a trip to California. Marijuana isn't just decriminalized in California. It is de facto legal.
The medical marijuana law provides that any illness is sufficient justification for a mmj recommendation. In actual practice, this means that no adult is denied a recommendation if they ask for one. Anyone can get legal marijuana with a short trip to the doctor and a $100 fee.
There are upwards of a million people with recommendations now and hundreds of stores to serve them. The stores are in strip malls and other regular store locations. They advertise marijuana specials in the newspaper. (You can see some at http://www.marijuanabusinessnews.com/JEMM_Default.aspx ) Some have neon signs in the window. Some have done $50 million in business from a single location in a single year.
The bigger news is that it isn't a problem. The general public in California knows that anyone can get a recommendation. They know that there are stores out there. It isn't bothering them, so nobody really cares.
The biggest problems are traffic and parking around busy or poorly run stores. Well-run stores don't have any more problems than any other comparable store, and well-run stores are invariably welcome additions to the neighborhood. In one case, the retail marijuana industry was responsible for reviving a formerly blighted area of Oakland, now called Oaksterdam.
Legal marijuana is already here in California and none of the Chicken Little predictions came true. In fact, the great majority of people -- smokers and non-smokers alike -- are quite happy with it.
Anonymous (April 28, 2008 @ 2:08pm):
So 9:12, just what did you do to PO the cops? They may be thigs but they don't usually pick random victims for that kind of treatment.
I'd suggest getting a lawyer involved before they find a way to beat you down and charge you with damaging their billy clubs, or make you pay to recharge their tasers. Remember, the cops can do whatever they like and then lie about the reasons fo doing it.
You'd best hope they don't use some bogus informant to get a no-knock warrent and bust your door down in the middle of the night.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
