Have hope for Earth’s well-being

Ben Patterson
Sharing Tools:

E-mail this article:




by Ben Patterson
Friday, April 25, 2008 00:00

Maybe my colleague Sean Kittridge was right when he said no one cared that Tuesday was Earth Day (“Earth Day nice yet ineffective holiday,” April 23). But what he failed to think of was the potential of Earth Day.

Once I sifted through the endless pessimism Mr. Kittridge was so apt at expounding, I came to the realization that many people must have misconceptions of what Earth Day is, or rather, what it should be. Mr. Kittridge’s rationale primarily rested on the idea that people only care about our planet if they are required to go through community service projects or school activities. Similarly, only if the government enforces eco-friendly regulations on the corporations responsible for the consumer’s polluting will people be forced to “care.”

Personally, I believe that people do in fact have self-driven concerns for the well-being of our planet. Call me crazy. Nonetheless, Earth Day is the perfect opportunity for individuals to share their concerns and attempt to spread awareness through multiple streams.

Earth Day was created by our own former senator, Gaylord Nelson, back in 1970 to encourage political support for environmental awareness. And to this day it continues to accomplish what it set out to do: inform. Earth Day may be just one day out of the year, but it’s the perfect opportunity for everyone to look at their own lifestyle and analyze what they could be doing differently. The day doesn’t necessarily need to be a celebration of our planet, as the term “holiday” may suggest, but rather should be a day for introspection to remember and acknowledge that we all live in one world where everyone’s actions affect each other.

We can’t be so ignorant to believe that legislators are going to hold our hand to tell us specifically how to fix our planet’s health issues. That’s for each person to realize individually. And unless you’re one of the few global warming non-believers left, the need to go green is nothing new to you. But the actual implementing of a green lifestyle is often seen as something impractical or maybe even burdensome. The truth is you don’t have to change your life or spend more money to be eco-friendly. In fact, being environmentally conscious could make you wealthier.

Say a bunch of your friends bring some cases over to party and play beer pong: something that I know I wouldn’t give up, even for the environment. But this time, instead of buying plastic cups for beer pong and just throwing the cans out, party the eco-friendly way.

A website based right here in Madison, rerackcups.com, offers custom, reusable, regulation-size beer pong cups. The website offers different designs for your beer pong needs and has made sure the cups are dishwasher safe. With these cups, there’s no longer a need to buy new cups every time someone wants to play this great American game.

Likewise, all those cans that may accumulate in every crevice of the house after a party can be turned into cold, hard cash. A pound of aluminum is currently worth one dollar. A few parties, maybe a few hangovers, and you’ve got yourself another brand new case while protecting the environment all the while.

There are countless things people can do to contribute to the environmental awareness effort. But in the end it is entirely up to each person to account for himself and do the things necessary to create a world and lifestyle conducive to environmental consciousness. We shouldn’t look at Earth Day as a meek attempt at fixing the planet’s problems; rather, if nothing else, we should look at it as a day to think about our own actions. Maybe with some personal insight and revelation people will begin to take steps to become responsible for their effect on the planet that belongs to everyone. It’s the only way things will ever truly change.

Ben Patterson (bpatterson@wisc.edu) is a junior majoring in political science.


Feedback
Anonymous (April 25, 2008 @ 7:04am):

Earth Day is the high holy day celebration of the religious Left's cult of Gaia. Those of us with differing religious backgrounds accept your professions as a matter of personal hope (what we call "faith").

We resent, however, the use of public money and public property to indoctrinate the rest of us in your faith and its rituals.

If the creche and menorah are verboten in the public square, why are we all forced to pay so that religious Leftists can genuflect along with Al Gore at the altar of Captain Planet and the Paneteers?

Anonymous (April 25, 2008 @ 1:26pm):

After all, who can be against helping the Earth? But as Petr Beckmann, founder of Access to Energy, used to say, there is no need for coercive laws requiring us to conserve diamonds and gold...

Actually, some conservation laws make sense; but note what has come of environmentalism: the mechanisms of government are used to make us add methanol to gasoline despite all the engineering objections to the stuff; despite the fact that it takes about as much energy to make the ethanol or methanol as your car gets from it; and the result is lots of money for the producers (astonishment!) and silent famine in parts of Asia; food riots in Mexico City, and I suppose a feeling of smug accomplishment by those who require us to burn food. Welcome to the Day After Earth Day.

Will Liberty Go Extinct?
Environmental regulation threatens economic freedom

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGQ1ZTlmNTFjOGIxOTYyNjdjODJmMDMwMmViODY5ODI=

Anonymous (April 26, 2008 @ 10:05am):

To the first two posters:

Those who care about the environment don't all support biofuels, or want to save obscure endangered species, or supoort attacking Japanese whaling ships with rancid butter. That's like saying all Catholics take Genesis literally or all Republicans like getting jerked off in airport bathrooms or all Feminists like making a big deal out of nothing. Well, I guess that last one doesn't work.

There's a way to be environmentally responsible without being irrational. If you're serious about trying to understand how business can be eco-friendly and how environmentalism can be business-friendly, read "Cradle to Cradle".

"Will Liberty Go Extinct?
Environmental regulation threatens economic freedom"

I'm guessing you want pure economic freedom. Correct? Well, might as well get rid of those pesky child-labor laws, 40-hour work week laws, workplace safety laws... etc... etc...

Anonymous (April 27, 2008 @ 4:40pm):

"Well, might as well get rid of those pesky child-labor laws, 40-hour work week laws, workplace safety laws... etc... etc..."

What, follow China's lead? IF we did, we might be able to compete with them.

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.

Login...



   Remember me


Not registered? Sign up now.

It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.

...or Post Your Comment Anonymously

Anonymous

Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!

DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!

Place a classified ad

Advertising