Opinion
Onus for funds on UW students
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Suchita Shah:
- Grad speakers sorely lacking (April 30, 2008)
- Onus for funds on UW students (April 23, 2008)
- Arts education gravely ignored (April 16, 2008)
- Multicultural groups enrich campus community (April 9, 2008)
- EPA not able to crack the whip (April 2, 2008)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
With less than one month left until graduation, seniors entering the job market are bolstered by the name of the school on their diploma: the University of Wisconsin-Madison. That respected name connotes a world-class education, but its reputation may be becoming compromised.
As UW’s funding situation becomes more desperate, we have arrived at a crossroads as a university. We could spiral downward and perpetually prune services, or we could take a step forward, reinvigorating present funding sources and cultivating new ones, remaining a top public research university.
The April 18 edition of The Chronicle of Higher Education shed light on a funding problem many on this campus already perceive. As the article said, “Wisconsin’s stagnating state higher-education budget has forced the university to keep faculty salaries far below average.” In the political science department alone, one-fifth of the professors left last year, surely contributing to UW’s drop from 34th to 38th in U.S. News and World Report’s rankings.
Recently, I sat down with the chancellor’s chief of staff, Casey Nagy, and Assistant Director of State Relations Don Nelson to discuss the matter. In our meeting they stressed that, while support services and personnel are being eliminated because of budget issues, UW is trying to maintain the academic mission and the education experience — which is fantastic. But what happens when there is nothing left to cut except class sections or entire departments? Bleeding professors and trimming academic services inevitably compromises the quality of education. In 30 years, will graduate schools and employers see your degree from UW as merely mediocre?
It is a doomsday picture of this university’s future, but it doesn’t have to be that way. We students hold the key to strengthening and sustaining our institution. We, the direct beneficiaries of this public service, are the ones who must reengage with the state of Wisconsin and the state Legislature. If legislators hear from their constituents, especially en masse, you can bet they’ll be conscious of our concerns.
It would be pretty hard for a representative from, say, Whitewater, to ignore the clamoring of ten students — and their parents — who live in his district. If even 30 voters contacted their legislator, it would send a clear message: The quality of education is on the line. Not just for us who are already in the system, but also for future generations of Badgers.
It is a mutual exchange, and there should be no sides to take on this issue. Mr. Nagy called it “a clarity of vision and a common cause.” The state and its citizens — regardless of political persuasion — articulate needs, and the UW System plays a vital role in fulfilling them. By doing so, UW solidifies its own necessity in the hearts and minds of the state’s citizens. The resurgence of the Wisconsin Idea brings with it an imperative to not only give back to the community, but also to cultivate an understanding of how a strong public university translates into a strong Wisconsin.
And that’s where we come in. We must convey to our families and our communities back home what exactly it is all Wisconsinites are gaining through our UW education. Without that conversation, how can we expect the Legislature or the general population — especially the essential private donors — to understand?
I’ll be honest; I’ve contacted my representative about funding issues maybe twice during my undergraduate career. But this doomsday picture demonstrates how essential it is that all of us reengage. If we students don’t contact our legislators or make our priorities known, who will?
Imagine the 25,000 in-state students, supported by the 17,000 out-of-state students (and that is only here at UW-Madison, not counting the entire UW System), mobilized our families to discuss this issue with elected officials. Mr. Nelson, someone who works daily in the capitol, predicted that legislators would “stop their day” to address the common constituent concerns.
The state’s resources are certainly both finite and insufficient. That does not preclude us, however, from our commitment to UW’s future.
If anything, we students should care about the future of this university for selfish purposes. If you can’t find a reason to mobilize on its behalf, mobilize on your own behalf. Go forth into the world, but remember the name and reputation of the institution on your diploma. Because if we don’t find a way to strengthen UW now, it’s going to be that much harder when you are on the job market, and even more so for the future classes of Badgers.
Suchita Shah (sshah@badgerherald.com) is a senior studying neurobiology.
4 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!
IP hash: c30dc1b7
My alma mater does a program called ‘Storm the Capitol,’ in which dozens of students are bussed to the (rather distant) state capitol to lobby for education funding.
Surely ASM can organize something like that when the capitol is visible from much of campus.
IP hash: 3794febd
Since Reagan was the governor of California the cool thing to do as a republican congressman/governor/senator/etc… was to cut funds to education. Reagan almost destroyed the UC system. The state congress has deiced to continue the trend and bash the “liberal bastion” that is UW-Madison. I’ll admit to having found a disproportionate amount of left to far left views in the Sociology, Political Science and other liberal arts departments, I have found right wing views in the economics dept. and else where. If we really want this to change we all live close to the capital. One day when they are in session, just talk a huge number of students and see if we can’t make a chain around it or something. Make it an issue to Joe Smith in up state Wisconsin and not just a local issue. The fact of the matter is that places like Babcock and CALS befit many of the districts of congress people cutting our funds. If the board played hardball and said any new cuts would come not from Bio or Poli Sci but from things that seem more likely to benefit this conservative districts the tune would surely change.
IP hash: 34f51f46
“UW’s drop from 34th to 38th in U.S. News and World Report”
Yeah, because their rankings aren’t totally pulled from their ass or anything.
IP hash: 1167e1ef
The author is right. Until voters create a political consequence for a legislator who does not advocate for and support allocating more general purpose revenue (Wisconsin’s term for tax dollars) to the UW System, we will come in behind the road builders, the realtors, the prison system, aid to municipalities, and medical assistance. This does not necessarily mean higher taxes; legislators need to decide priorities for spending the tax revenue the state currently receives. If they can’t reallocate, then they should reform our tax system to reflect revenue sources in a 21st century economy.