Opinion
Transit system idea absurd for Madison
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Sara Mikolajczak:
- A wake up call to UW conservatives (September 26, 2008)
- American tragedy lives with us (September 12, 2008)
- Resist liberal indoctrination on campus (August 6, 2008)
- Ruling ensures prevention of electoral fraud from illegal immigrants (May 1, 2008)
- Leave alcohol age to states (April 17, 2008)
When I was in Washington, D.C., earlier this month, I marveled at the ease with which I could get around such a huge place. The D.C. Metro took me darn near everywhere I wanted to go for a relatively low cost — an all-day pass on a Saturday was only $7. The train could go underground at speeds of up to 85 mph and was a lot more efficient than taking a taxi. I even had a delightful woman telling me, “Stand back. Doors closing.” at each stop to keep me from getting caught in the doors of the rail car. Affordable. Efficient. Safe. Maybe a train in Madison wouldn’t be such a bad idea, I thought.
That thought lasted about five seconds before I realized how wrong I was.
First of all, the population of Dane County (the most popular proposal is for all of Dane County, not just Madison) is a mere 426,000 people. Not even half a million people on 35 million acres? With the proposed placement of the train stations and stops, it is estimated that less than 5 percent of the population will actually benefit from it. That means that in all of Dane County, the equivalent of half the students on the UW campus would use the train. When the taxpayers (yes, you are a taxpayer) of Dane County are shelling out more than $45 million per year forever and ever, does it really seem fair? I think not.
If we leave the rest of the county out of the equation for a moment and just focus on UW students, the concept of a train that runs along campus becomes even more ridiculous. Assume that the rate of benefit from Dane County carries over to UW students, which would mean that only about 2,000 students would benefit from the light rail system. The rest of the students, especially those who utilize the Metro bus system, would suffer great setbacks.
First, look at the cost breakdown. The buses cost an average of $1.50 per passenger; the train would cost an average of $65. That’s per ride. At $1.50 per ride when most the student body uses the buses, it’s perfectly feasible for ASM to provide bus passes through our segregated fees at the beginning of each semester. If ASM provided train passes to students and 95 percent of campus didn’t use them, we’d be out a ton of money with no way to get it back.
Having a light rail system in and around campus would cause other problems with the more frequently used bus system. According to Transport 2020, the county committee that recommended the rail plan, buses are not allowed to compete with train routes. That means, if there’s a train that goes down University Avenue, as proposed, all the buses that go down it would have to either be eliminated or rerouted. So, anyone who takes the bus down University to get to class, or work, or home, or go to the grocery store, had better be willing to walk or pay a heck of a lot more for a train. To the Madison Metro system, it wouldn’t make much sense to reroute the trains. Instead, they’d cut the routes, gut the entire bus system, and reroute a few buses to feed directly into the train system so you’d be forced to take the tram.
Not only would the bus system suffer because of the trains, but you could too. Right now, it’s federal law that trains have the right of way. All traffic must be stopped in all directions at any train crossing when a train is passing. That makes perfect sense, right? Well, not so much when you think about the number of hospitals in the area and the fact that all emergency vehicles would have to stop for trains, too. If there’s an emergency and you need to get to the hospital at a time when a light rail train is going past you, too bad.
The environment suffers, too. Wisconsin is ever concerned with the amount of pollution thrust into the air by our vehicles, but we want a train? Yes, a train itself would save energy and cause less pollution, but if traffic is stopped several times per hour during rush hour at multiple points, those standing vehicles only add to the air pollution we’re worried so much about.
If that doesn’t convince you, visit www.thegreattrainrobbery.org for more information. When it comes down to it, light rail in Dane County would be excessively expensive, a huge inconvenience for students who utilize the Metro bus system, a burden to hospitals and other local emergency services, and environmentally unfriendly.
Sounds like a great idea, doesn’t it?
Sara Mikolajczak (WisconsinCRs@gmail.com) is the chair of the UW-Madison College Republicans.
22 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
President’s Visit Marked a Speech to One of the Last Groups Not Critical of Him
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com






The “D.C. Metro” subway was largely funded by US Congress. The population of Washington D.C. is less than 600,000 but let’s be generous and include the whole metropolitan area since the subway is now part of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. We’ll also be generous and pretend that everyone living in the area uses the metro. That makes the population utilized by this service in DC, NOVA, and MD roughly 5,000,000. That is < 2% of the people who paid for it. M
akes the Madison train seem reasonable, doesn”t it?
Well said! The idea of light rail in Madison is just a joke. Expand the bus system and you can save a lot of money.
You are wrong. It will happen eventually. Your thinking is too myopic and short-term. In fact, its thinking like this that puts off the inevitabble. We’d probably still be riding horse and carriage if you were in chare 120 years ago because paving roads cost taxpayers money.
DAMMIT SARA AGAIN YOUR TRAPPED INSIDE OF YOUR OWN SHORT TERM REASONSING. I WANT TO GAG MYSELF.
the only good thing about a light rail would be cheap access to the airport..other than that it’s a waste of money.
Just give everybody a new hybrid car and a lifetime supply of gas - it would be cheaper.
DAMMIT SARA AGAIN YOUR TRAPPED INSIDE OF YOUR OWN SHORT TERM REASONSING. I WANT TO GAG MYSELF.
What reasoning?
A train would stop traffic for less time than a red light. Is that the biggest concern you can raise? That, and the grossly overstated costs. And the hospitals located next to the already existing train bridges. Oh, and the wrong ridership numbers. But you’ve got a readable font. That much I can say is good.
As a resident of Virginia who takes the Metro in to work every day, I can assure you the system is not all it seems be so lovingly described above. Affordable? The cost to the rider is much higher here than in any of the other major cities. (My sister rides for one fixed fare in Boston regardless of distance.) Efficient? There is constant Alert scroll on the system’s webpage alerting travelers of delays. Safe? Crime is up on the system (Robberies up 19%)and Metro just hired a new officer in charge from the Federal Transit Administration to combat it.
“Assume that the rate of benefit from Dane County carries over to UW students, which would mean that only about 2,000 students would benefit from the light rail system.”
That’s a dumb assumption. Students are more likely to benefit from a light rail system because they’re more likely to live in close proximity to stops. That doesn’t necessarily mean that light rail is a good idea, just that Sara’s argument is ridiculous, as usual.
“Well, not so much when you think about the number of hospitals in the area and the fact that all emergency vehicles would have to stop for trains, too. If there’s an emergency and you need to get to the hospital at a time when a light rail train is going past you, too bad.”
Yeah! Instead of respecting the train’s right of way, you should run out in front of it! That’ll show it!
UWCR needs a new chair. Then again, the rest of the party isn’t doing much better.
If you’re going to take the time to respond, maybe you should criticize the ideas and not her. Everything Sara stated is fact. Saying that “UWCR needs a new chair” is not only improper grammar, but it’s also false. Sara is the best thing to ever happen to the UWCRs. Personally, I hope she stays on board for next year. (Unless she’s smart enough to leave crazy Madison for the election.)
-E
Let’s look at it this way. A light rail system is estimated to cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 million. Invest that money at a conservative five percent interest and you get $15 million per year, more than enough to fund a major expansion of Madison’s bus system that reaches far beyond University Avenue.
“the train would cost an average of $65.”
What the hell are you talking about? You’re saying they’re going to charge people this? You’re wrong. They’d charge something similar to the bus system. The RTA would also cut some of the bus system because this is in place, giving it more funds.
There’s a half-cent sales tax to pay for it. Oooooh scary!
Just stop writing nonsense.
When I was a student, my two feet served me very well. The most absurd notion is that students’ two feet cant serve them adequately enough.
From March to November these trains are all but empty. Why in the world would any student pay to ride a train when they are equiped with a bike, a moped, a car, a pogo stick, etc …
As much as I love Madison, I don’t miss it, college campuses seem to be the epicenter of confusion, not enlightenment ..
How about some middle ground between “The Great Train Robbery” anti-smart growth group (aka “The Great Highway Robbery”) and something preliminarily only serving a stretch between Middleton and Sun Prairie? What about Express Bus service throughout the Urbanized Area going from : 1) Waunakee to Fitchburg, 2) DeForest to Verona, 3) Sun Prairie to Oregon, 4) Cross Plains to Stoughton, and Cottage Grove to the UW campus. Doing so would generate local jobs and save households bundles on the ever-increasing cost of gas. And yeah, mass transit can be good for the environment, public health, and a sense of community too.
Go to www.busadvocates.com to check out some ideas about Bus Rapid Transit. Consider joining the UW’s Student Bus Advocates group.
Since when do Republicans care about the environment?
“‘UWCR needs a new chair’ is not only improper grammar”
UWCR is a group, which is singular, therefore needs is correct. Don’t try to play grammar police unless you know what you’re talking about.
You goddamned young whippersnappers ought to have listened to esteemed Badger Herald alum Davy Mayer when he pitched his zeppelin-based mass transit solution during his ill-fated run for mayor. Damn libtards! - Germain Q. Stemme
UWCR actually stands for “University of Wisconsin College Republicans” which is plural. Please consider revising your ill-informed comment 4:14.
The rail system is ill advised. Upgrading Madison Metro routes and building a Bus Rapid Transit system is more suitable and cost effective.
S. Thunander Class of 2007