Drug incarceration rates real buzz kill
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Sean Kittridge:
- Hold crooks to same standard (March 24, 2009)
- Important cures stem from cells (March 9, 2009)
- Government says Mexico unsafe? Gimme a break (March 2, 2009)
- Mascot battle does little for Indians, or mascots (February 23, 2009)
- Latest endorsement in Supreme Court race: Killer (February 16, 2009)
by Sean Kittridge
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 00:00
I would like to open with a sincere apology to my elementary school D.A.R.E. officer. Although his mustache was more memorable than his name, the message of drug and violence resistance he promoted to a classroom full of fifth graders was both noble and necessary. At least, that's what I used to think.
These days, after weighing my options, I have decided it's probably about time to start smoking pot. But I am not looking to engage in illicit drug use in order to relax myself or figure out what Pink Floyd is really trying to tell me. I plan on doing it simply because, legally, I have nothing to fear. There is a simple, self-administered test that will quickly tell your risk of drug-related incarceration. First, look at your skin. If you're white, turn up the Bob Marley and toke on. However, if you're black, just do as D.A.R.E. taught you and say no.
Recently, the Wisconsin State Journal reported that Dane County ranks No. 3 in the nation in regards to the racial disparity of drug offenders. According to U.S. Bureau of Justices numbers, for every one white person Dane County puts away for a drug offense, the county locks up 97 black people for similar offenses. Now, numbers might be cold and unconvincing, but there is little doubt in the injustice evidenced by this report. How can it be that a county like Dane, whose progressivism is known nationwide, be so inherently backward in its criminal prosecution?
Although I do not have a statistic to back it up, I am willing to put my journalistic integrity on the line when I say that black people do not partake in 97 percent more drug use than whites. To suggest otherwise would be nothing short of absurd. But to admit that is to concede that somewhere in our great legal system is an error, or to put it better, more errors than an Enron tax statement. This statistic is nothing more than a reflection of the way the American justice system works and has worked for a number of years.
The first fault lies with the police. It is much easier for the police to drive through a high-crime, low-income area and pick up a few minor drug dealers than it is to investigate how the businessman next to you is getting high. But this is where this issue becomes less black-and-white, for isn't it good for society to get every drug dealer off the street, whether they sell on the corner or the back of the bar? Yes, it is, but at some point — and that point is now — we need to examine the effect of these incarceration rates on the black community.
This is a college town, and no one is under the illusion that drug use does not exist within the overly white college population. So when the black community sees the hammer come down on them at a rate that is nearly 100 times greater than the white kids in the apartment complex, this is going to breed a negative sentiment among them, which isn't good for the police or the community.
The second culprit is the courts and the political culture, which has put a premium on a desire to be harsh with criminals. Although locking up minor drug offenders may take nothing more than the drop of a gavel, it accomplishes even less. By filling up the prisons and costing the county millions of dollars, we are creating a generation of disgruntled convicts. Prison is not a drug-free environment, and it does not offer inmates the necessary opportunities to function as both sober human beings and productive community members. By passing on alternatives such as rehabilitation and lesser penalties in order to make a statement and preserve a political ideal, the courts and politicians are compounding an already massive problem.
No matter what your pigment may be, drug prosecution in this country is out of hand. But when an already troubled system shows what can be construed as racial underpinnings, it becomes obvious that action must be taken. While we are not turning a blind eye to drug crime, we are turning a very selective one, and the effects are damaging the entire community — some parts more than others. While the issue is complex, it is necessary that the criminal playing field become more level and that drug prosecution take its focus off reelection and back onto the community. I can only hope they'll do so before I smoke myself silly.
Sean Kittridge (kittridge@wisc.edu) is a sophomore majoring in journalism.
Feedback
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 10:25am):
"I am willing to put my journalistic integrity on the line when I say that black people do not partake in 97 percent more drug use than whites."
Math wasn't a good subject for you it seems. 97 to 1 does not translate into '97 percent' but '97 TIMES more drug use'. Sounds high but then what studies have been done?
"...before I smoke myself silly"
You're silly now.
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 1:16pm):
The disparities in drug laws are a classic example of why i'm so damn cynical. 5 grams of crack gets one the same amount of prison time as someone with 500 grams of coke......get the fuck outta here with that. And then you got clowns like poster 10:25am who are more focused on trying to be witty....keep tryin' buddy!
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 2:01pm):
you make it seem like drug abuse HAS to happen. hmmmmmmm, heres a thought, why doesn't everyone STOP ABUSING DRUGS?!? I don't feel a damn bit of sorrow for anyone busted for illegal use. drug abusers are idiots and the ones who get caught are even bigger idiots.
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 2:54pm):
"The first fault lies with the police..."
If you're in a high crime area, wouldn't you think that crime reduction is a worthwhile objective?
The Guiliani-doctrine, which several BH writers love so much, basically says that all crime, no matter how petty, is crime worth fighting. No grafitti, no drugs, no loitering...
The low-crime areas, the "white" parts of town, can exist as-is until crime become rampant.
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 3:07pm):
We should hardly need to wait for studies to come out to know that the 97 times higher number indicates massive discrimination in our "justice" system. Let's give the number the best chance it has, and assume that every single Black person in Wisconsin, all 300,000 of them, does drugs. Even if this were the case, and it's obviously a massive exagerration, if we divide that by 97, we get a total population of white drug users of only about 3,000. There are more white kids at UW than that who do drugs, let alone white people in the entire state. Sean is right, our entire criminal justice system is a human rights offense of a massive scale.
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 3:45pm):
2:01 - Why should drug abuse be treated differently from different crimes? Shoplifting also doesn't HAVE to happen, but we don't see people advocating massive mandatory sentences for shoplifters. Posing the question that way is stupid. Drug use has existed in practically every human society we know of. By all measures, it will continue to happen. The question is what we do about it that's actually productive.
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 4:10pm):
"10:25am who are more focused on trying to be witty"
97 percent or 97 times - no big diff to an ignorant journalist who doesn't 'get' that kind of 'higher' math, right?
Even Jethro got past 2 + 2, he could do 'times' AND 'gahinztas' also.
Anonymous (December 11, 2007 @ 9:07pm):
The disparities in drug laws are a classic example of unintended consequences.
The reason for the difference was the fact that crack was destroying the black community.
I guess it's easier to be a functional powder coke addict than a functional crack addict?
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
...or Post Your Comment Anonymously
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
The Passion of C-FACT, or ‘What Happens When You Lose Your Papers’
Extra Points
Football recruiting: Two under-the-radar prospects commit
Simply Sumptuous
Development Weblog
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!


