Opinion
ASM web page ‘sucks’
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Clegg absurd, biased on CFACT (May 5, 2009)
- Fund peer tutors (April 28, 2009)
- UW policy consistent with nation (April 23, 2009)
- Biddy's initiative not worth it (April 20, 2009)
- A plan for better advising (April 20, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
I would like to say that I agree 110 percent with the ASM’s poor handling of instructors’ evaluations in your Editorial Board article ("Clean Up on Aisle Common Sense," Nov. 6) last week. I got a mass e-mail Wednesday from ASM, telling me to check out their site. As a webmaster and amateur web designer, I was appalled by the poor quality of evaluation web pages. In fact, I thought they were so bad, I took the liberty to share this with Vincent Flanders, author of the books "Web Pages That Suck" and "Son of Web Pages That Suck" and the founder of webpagesthatsuck.com — a compendium of examples of terrible web design practices intended to "scare" webmasters into making accessible, functional and somewhat aesthetically pleasing websites.
I am happy (or not happy, whatever) to have just heard that he will post the ASM Course Evaluations web pages as a "Daily Sucker" on webpagesthatsuck.com, with choice comments from yours truly.
If I ever teach people about proper web design, I’ll point them to the ASM Course Evaluations web pages to show them what not to do.
Mike Pruden
UW senior, mathematics
pruden@wisc.edu
11 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
President’s Visit Marked a Speech to One of the Last Groups Not Critical of Him
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Wow Mike, do you realize that ASM is a part of the university you attend, and now that portion is casted publicly in a poor light. Way to take ‘em down, Mike! You are one great guy.
Wait, would it have made more sense to actually share your knowledge and offer to help out with the design? Or simply going in and talking to the web master, and letting them know of their poor design and suggestions to improve it.
I mean it is definitely easier to bash ASM and write a “tattle-tale” editorial.
But stepping up and helping a group that represents the same university that you do, well that’s what a man would do.
Yeah, Mike, how dare you make ASM look bad! That’s one of ASM’s biggest campaigns: “Lose Legitimacy, NOW!”
To get everything straight, here are the links:
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/ - listed as Daily Sucker #1 for Thursday, November 15, 2007
“Old site” - http://www.asm.wisc.edu/cms/content/view/88/83/
“New site with hideous design” - http://apps.asm.wisc.edu/evals/index/index.htm
The ASM office is in room 511 of Memorial Union, I assume you’ll be stopping by on Monday to volunteer your services?
In response to Anonymous @ 8:37am:
I’m not saying ASM doesn’t have its faults, but why would a UW student want to promote it?
so rather than help constructively by talking to the webmaster you bitch to Vincent Flander?
What exactly was the intent or purpose of this editorial? Other than proving to anyone who reads the BH that you’re an A-hole?
725,
a little defensive?
Nothing at this university needs to be improved. Everything is perfect. All criticism is misplaced and dangerous.
Way to go Mike! As another web designer on campus, right on. I wonder how many $$$ go to throwing ASM events when it could have been go to finding a quality web designer on campus that knows whats going on and do the job right!
So I’m being accused of “biting the hand that feed us.” Do you people realize that this university is also funded in part by the city, state, and federal governments? Keep in mind that when we don’t like something the city, state, or federal governments do, we do the exact same thing - usually in the form of protests or similar knee-jerk reactions. I suppose that the only difference is that the latter is accepted here, while mine is apparently not.
How about this? Instead of being constructive when the ASM online elections glitched three times a couple of years ago, many students were crying for an end of how the student government was run. Few articles were written on how the ASM were working with DoIT to make sure this didn’t happen again.
My point is: What makes what I did any different than what many students at this great university do?
And I greatly appreciate the ad hominem comments, as well. Especially when I did not attack any one single person in my write-up.
And no, I will not show up Monday to volunteer my services, if everyone is now going to be mean and hostile and willing to bite my f*in head off!
P.S. If I offended any single member who has worked hard with ASM, my apologies; that was not my intent. The intent was to criticize the web site. But I suppose not many people can take criticism. xD
P.S.S. Real men also don’t hide behind their computer and post anonymously.