OPINION & EDITORIAL
Halloween success story exaggerated
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Henry Weiner:
- Not easy being green with lazy students (November 7, 2007)
- Halloween success story exaggerated (October 24, 2007)
- Democrats wimp out, change little (October 10, 2007)
- Wise up voters: Move past Iraq (September 28, 2007)
- Student diversity sets future tracks (September 12, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Halloween, take 2 (October 30, 2001)
- A Hollow-een (October 26, 2007)
- Students add to Madison's mystique (October 6, 2005)
- Let Halloween fall where it may (October 9, 2003)
- What happens in Madison stays in Madison (October 29, 2004)
by Henry Weiner
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Madison and Halloween. Peanut butter and jelly. Barry Bonds and HGH.
All these things are hard to think of without thinking of the other. However, with the new trends of regulation, privatization and commercialization, Halloween in Madison is going to end up like the Notre Dame football program: People only go because they are promised the Mecca that it used to be.
What am I talking about here? Wasn’t Halloween last year a huge success? There weren’t any riots. Arrests were nearly cut in half. The city made money by selling tickets for access to State Street and everyone still had a good time. Right? I’m sorry, folks, but the numbers suggest otherwise.
I’m not just another UW student who thinks the cops should stay home Halloween weekend and let us do whatever we want. That’s just stupid. What I am is a UW student who thinks the city is lying to itself if it thinks it’s moving in the right direction with the Halloween policies it’s implementing.
Last year, nearly 300 police officers called in from all over the area made 244 arrests on State Street, ranging from “depositing human waste” to underage consumption of alcohol to possession of cocaine. The mayor and the police trumpeted this number as a success. The number of arrests from the previous year, 468, was nearly cut in half, right? Right. But wouldn’t you expect that when only slightly more than 34,000 people showed up last year as opposed to more than 80,000 the year before? I’m no math major or anything, but doesn’t that actually make for a higher arrest rate than the previous Halloween? Holy Cieslewicz, it does!
How about the money issue though? Last year’s revelry was sure to make the city a ton of dough through ticket sales and all the money it saved on tear gas. Not so fast, you optimists you. The costs last year totaled around $500,000 with 2005’s total coming in close to $400,000. According to an article published in The Isthmus earlier this year, the 2006 Freakfest cost the city of Madison itself $28,000 more than its 2005 predecessor. A lot of the money loss was due to a drop in the number of fines police handed out and also an increase of funds heading toward other police agencies. The five dollars that it cost to get onto State Street didn’t make enough money to balance out these factors.
With the installation of six high-tech security cameras and two more to come by Friday — according to Channel 3000 — and the hiring of private companies to handle security and musical matters, don’t expect the costs to drop drastically any time soon. They want the event to be a “safe” and “concert-like experience.” If I wanted a concert, I would just walk by the porch of 11 N. Bassett St. Saturday night and get a free show that would blow Lifehouse or Mighty Short Bus out of the water.
Also, the revenue hotels, restaurants and shops lose when more than 45,000 people from out of town who were there the year before decide not to come for the weekend and the days leading up to it. The announcement of Mountain Dew as an official nonalcoholic sponsor to Freakfest 2007 is another step to commercialize the event and try to cut costs, although you never quite know if corporate sponsorship in Madison will drive even more people away.
The city was right when it said it had to stop the riots, which had marred previous Halloween gatherings. However, they city took it way too far, and it needs to stop. It’s as simple as looking at the numbers and statistics and realizing things haven’t worked out quite as swimmingly as one is led to believe.
Keep everyone safe, yes, but stop trying to give Frankenstein a facelift.
Henry Weiner (hweiner@wisc.edu) is a sophomore majoring in political science.
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 10:30am):
I think some of YOUR numbers are messed up.
"34,000 people showed up last year as opposed to more than 80,000 the year before"
Where is this data coming from? What does "showed up" mean? Are we talking both on Friday and Saturday night? Is this number limited to the number of people that were on State street alone?
"Also, the revenue hotels, restaurants and shops lose when more than 45,000 people from out of town who were there the year before decide not to come for the weekend and the days leading up to it."
It is quite possible that the number of people in Madison was roughly the same as passed years but fewer people paid to go on to state street on Saturday night.
I also don't see the problem if there was a higher arrest rate. These are the people that help cover the huge cost of having the police presence. If the number of people that are actually on state street goes down, then I would expect a higher arrest rate. There aren't enough cops to arrest all of the idiots that deserve to be arrested on Halloween.
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 11:43am):
Showed up means saturday night, the night they sold tickets. Yes it is limited to the people on state street because thats where you can count dipshit.
Oh yes, 35,000 OUT OF TOWNERS, who came to Madison for something (HALLOWEN), just decided not to go. I am so fucking sure.
And whatever you decide to say about 'the idiots that deserve to get arrested' isn't his point...hes saying that the city has touted this as a great success, like there was a fundamental change in behavior, which a higher arrest rate would be somewhat of an affront to.
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 12:42pm):
Right on, Henry. Not only do I support your views, I've followed up on them -- last year I spent the weekend as a fully legal drinker in Minneapolis and had a far better time. This year, will do the same. I predict the amount of arrests this year will decline a huge amount based solely on word of mouth and those who experienced last year's "Freakfest." They're not coming back.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
