OPINION & EDITORIAL
Barrett: Free speech hypocrite
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- SSFC stipend appropriate (December 11, 2007)
- Poor plowing cuts off handicapped access (December 10, 2007)
- Cars that actually help the environment (December 10, 2007)
- Organic food: Deliciously safe (December 10, 2007)
- Diversity deserves attention at UW (December 7, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Fractured fairy tales (October 2, 2006)
- Stay classy, Barrett (September 4, 2006)
- Have some manners, liberals (October 24, 2007)
- Rehiring Barrett too risky (February 15, 2007)
by Letters to the Editor
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Anybody who witnessed Kevin Barrett’s obnoxious heckling at David Horowitz’s lecture Monday night saw something truly tragic — the irrelevant ranting of a man briefly assuming a limelight he no longer inhabits. It never really mattered that Mr. Barrett believes the Sept. 11 attacks were orchestrated by the Bush administration, a theory even Noam Chomsky dismisses as complete non-scientific rubbish. The UW Board of Regents properly stood up for Mr. Barrett’s First Amendment rights when it refused to fire him over his beliefs, regardless of inaccuracy.
The saga of Mr. Barrett should have been over long before this. But now it can be said to have officially ended, in the most pathetic and discrediting of fashions. By demonstrating his willingness to shout down a campus speaker, denying Mr. Horowitz his right to speak, Mr. Barrett proves he was never concerned with First Amendment rights in the first place. All that inspiring rhetoric about his noble free speech crusade, in an effort to represent an unrepresented position, was utter bullshit. Mr. Barrett might have otherwise gone down in UW history as an unlikely symbol of the free speech we value so much. But alas, he has shown himself to be the undemocratic, bullying heckler that he is. The only one spitting on the Constitution all this time, ultimately, has been Mr. Barrett himself.
Eric R. Schmidt
UW Junior, Political Science
eschmidt2@wisc.edu
Mike Pruden (October 24, 2007 @ 9:59am):
I think he was just trying to cater to the college crowd IMHO. Great Article!
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 10:08am):
I wish Kevin Barret would just disappear. Go away, Barret! Go away now!
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 11:51am):
well written, valid points
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 1:28pm):
I agree completely. How can Barret feel entitled to interrupt a lecture, instead of waiting for the scheduled Q&A like everybody else? What audacity!
Barret is such a hypocrite.
Anonymous (October 24, 2007 @ 3:21pm):
Apparently the consensus of informed opinion is that Kevin is an @$$hole!... @$$hole!... @$$hole!
Massengale should design a line of jumbo size feminine hygiene products and market them as The Barrett.
Anonymous (October 25, 2007 @ 8:34pm):
WORD!
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
