OPINION & EDITORIAL
Colbert: Closest thing to real conservative in ‘08
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Andy Granias:
- Masculinity ideal in need of review (December 6, 2007)
- Legal prostitution: Logically sound, ultimately amoral (December 4, 2007)
- Merry 'Santa-mas' to you (November 29, 2007)
- Discovery highlights moral, scientific boundaries (November 27, 2007)
- Does race matter in sports world? (November 12, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Conservatives need not hide (September 8, 2005)
- It's Morning Again in America (November 8, 2002)
- Another token (November 3, 2003)
- Giuliani, who are you kidding? (November 5, 2007)
- Jindal: Beacon of hope for '08 (October 23, 2007)
by Andy Granias
Thursday, October 18, 2007
One day — I think I was in fourth grade — I woke up and decided I would be the next president, or at least that I had all the makings of the next great Republican president. Really, it was one of the easier conclusions I’ve come to during the course of my life. I looked in the mirror that fine morning, as I carefully parted my hair directly down the middle of my head and decided that I had all the makings of a fine president: white, male… white.
It was all there for the taking, the highest office in the land.
Since then, however, I have changed my career goals and set my sights a little higher (I’m hoping to land an internship with The Critical Badger this summer, for starters).
In the meantime, though, I am happy to see that another fine American, Mr. Stephen Colbert, has come to the same realization I did so many years ago — that the Republican nomination has but three simple requirements: Be white, be a man and be conservative, or at least be able to convince enough people you’re truly conservative.
In an op-ed column leading up to his announcement, published in Sunday’s New York Times, Mr. Colbert wrote, "…it’s clear that the voters are desperate for a white male, middle-aged, Jesus-trumpeting alternative." Although he was kidding in true Colbert fashion, his sentiments were dead on.
While Mr. Colbert’s White House bid is little more than a glorified manifestation of an atrocious Robin Williams movie released last year, and his editorial little more than a truncated version of his comedy show in print, he has in the process revealed a very sad truth, or "truthiness" about what it takes to gain the Republican nomination. Quite simply, a candidate does not necessarily have to have a certain set of conservative values, but does have to be able to fool enough people into thinking he has those values as he assures voters that the blood in his veins is as red as the Deep South on an Election Day-map.
Pre-Fred Thompson entering the race, though, Republicans weren’t that worried. They thought Fred would be their conservative knight in shining armor, who would sooner or later burst onto the political seen like Willis Reed in the 4th quarter at Madison Square Garden, taking on the burden of all conservative woes with his lumbering Southern drawl and Reagan-esque acting career.
But, Mr. Thompson, barely conscious (or sober?) for either his official announcement or his first presidential debate, has fallen well short for conservative hopefuls. As Mr. Colbert told Larry King, "Fred Thompson has a great campaign motto: ‘Do not disturb.’"
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is as much a self-proclaimed conservative as ASM is an effective administrator of student elections. Although he is certainly the best-looking white male aside from Mr. Colbert, that won’t be enough to be considered a conservative after providing comprehensive health care to an entire population of sinners, the state of Massachusetts, and poorly covering up his previous statements on the right of a woman to abortion.
On top of that, with Rudolph Giuliani still in closet, or more accurately his purple-flowered dress and bright-red lipstick in the closet, and "maverick" John McCain all but hiring Russ Feingold to drive the "Straight Talk Express," most conservatives are still searching for the third piece to their political puzzle: a conservative they can believe is actually conservative. At least they were, until Tuesday.
With Mr. Colbert announcing his phony candidacy on Tuesday night, amid a flurry of red, white and blue balloons on the set of his TV show, he may not have realized that he is, in fact, everything conservative voters are looking for.
With MSNBC, CNN and Fox News running pieces yesterday about the viability of Mr. Colbert winning a primary in South Carolina, the only state he says he’s running in for now, conservatives have finally found a candidate who is good enough at pretending to be a conservative to actually win the nomination.
Andy Granias (agranias@badgerherald.com) is a junior majoring in political science and legal studies.
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 7:33am):
Stephen Colbert has my vote. That's today's Word!
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 8:23am):
For the record, Colbert is running in both the Democrat and the Republican primaries.
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 9:38am):
Andy,
Wow...
Just because the Herald wakes you up at six in the morning and begs you to fill an open op-ed slot, doesn't mean that you should use fake news as your factual references. However, I'm sure that if you had been able to spend more than a half of an hour on this, you could have put in some real insight (and maybe even some content).
Good luck next time.
-Concerned Reader
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 9:56am):
Cobert and Papa Bear '08
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 11:15am):
Well, Colbert is also running in the Democratic primaries. S. Carolina also splits its party delegates based on percent of votes received, so Colbert has a real chance of winning some delegates. Which is kinda sad when you think about it.
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 12:50pm):
No internship with Something Verbose?
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 1:06pm):
Granias '08!
Nice slam on critical badger
Anonymous (October 18, 2007 @ 8:58pm):
Oh ya, some slam, totally, like, referencing someone, totally pwned
Anonymous (October 27, 2007 @ 3:01pm):
there is one other true conservative. His name is Ron Paul
Anonymous (October 31, 2007 @ 5:12pm):
There's so much ground to cover on such a robust topic as a comedian running for presidency. There are so many stances you can take, from thinking its an insult to your government, to thinking that you may as well replace a clown with a comedian. I've read many opinions ranging from critisisms about it being a power grab (really, running for president is in deffinition a power grab, whether a comedian, politician or beautician)to praise. Personally, I think S.C. has a better shot at the whitehouse than Osama and Hillary. Americans won't see an african american or woman in office, because when it comes to vote day, it's a staggering minority that don't think of African Americans and women in negative sterio-types.
But TV! How many Californians knew anything about Arnies policies, vs Californians with mental images of Arnie covered in mud, stalking the deficit with a sharpened stick, or defeating poverty in a gladitorial arena fight.
Perception is the biggest factor in elections and the smallest factor in actual performance. Whats the harm in turning a shallow popularity contest into an open mike night?
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
