Opinion
Victims deserve true compassion
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Clegg absurd, biased on CFACT (May 5, 2009)
- Fund peer tutors (April 28, 2009)
- UW policy consistent with nation (April 23, 2009)
- Biddy's initiative not worth it (April 20, 2009)
- A plan for better advising (April 20, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
Dear Editor,
On April 25, the Senate Health Committee held a public hearing regarding the Compassionate Care for Rape Victims Act, which included speakers who were survivors of sexual assault, health care providers, advocates and community members, who voiced their support for the passage of SB 129. This bill ensures that victims of rape or incest receive immediate access to safe, efficient methods of pregnancy prevention. This occurs by requiring all Wisconsin emergency rooms to provide rape victims with information about, and access to emergency contraception. This seems like a simple concept, but a 2006 study found that 66 percent of Wisconsin emergency rooms fail to provide access to EC to rape victims.
The trauma of rape makes it difficult for women to ask questions about options like emergency contraception, and this is a situation where time is critical. Therefore, this service must be offered to victims of rape when they are present at the emergency room. Victims have enough to worry about regarding sexually transmitted infections, other health concerns and policy reports to worry about an unintended pregnancy as well. This bill does not force victims to take EC and gives victims some control during this terrifying experience.
Opponents of the bill argue that it violates the beliefs of hospital staff who may oppose EC, by requiring them to dispense this medication. As a future pharmacist, I would hope that the focus of concern in these situations would be for the victim and not the hospital staff. I know that I would never want my personal beliefs to interfere with providing a rape victim with comprehensive and compassionate care.
Alyssa Gonitzke
UW Student & Creighton University Pharmacy School Student
Class of 2011
3 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
Uh, Alyssa, in case you haven’t noticed, there are also male victims, many as young as age 6. And that many of the perpetrators are also women. Until you acknowledge those facts, your anti-male rants will continue to be ignored.
8:51am: Ms. Gonitzke is writing about a bill that specifically addresses contraception for sexual victims. That issue, by definition, only affects female victims (who make up 90% of sexual assault victims). She does not make any accusatory “anti-male” comments and instead writes from the more neutral perpective of female victims who must face a difficulty not faced by males who are sexually assaulted. No one is trying to hide the fact that males are also victims of sexual assault. Maybe Ms. Gonitzke should have explicitly acknowledged these male victims (despite the fact that they could not possibly suffer from the problem that was the subject of her piece), but her minor omission does NOT justify you “ignoring” her very important message. Your statement is a disservice to the victims that could benefit from this bill, and I hope you’ll reconsider your vow to “ignore” the issue.
Ah, anonymous, in case you haven’t noticed, men don’t need emergency contraception after they’re raped.
God, this abstinence only education just isn’t working.