Opinion
Discussion of shooting not over
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Defending Teach For America (November 17, 2009)
- BH SLAC-ing on coverage (November 16, 2009)
- UW and dead-end diversity (November 13, 2009)
- Stop singing immigrant's song (November 11, 2009)
- Blind acceptance of global warming bad (November 4, 2009)
In response to "Attempting to understand a troubled mind" on April 23:
Dear anonymous writer,
Finally, a printed opinion on this event that I mostly agree with, if at least in spirit. Here's another unprinted, unpopular view of this situation:
Most people grow out of the unfortunate position of being at the bottom of the Darwinist social structure in place at high school and college. When I think of what could have caused Cho to act out like this, I imagine a guy who has been bullied and filed to the bottom rung his whole life, while seeing those who bullied him continue to succeed, make friends, and appear happy. This gives him the impetus to believe that everyone is "hedonistic" and against him. We know the rest. This view allows me to contemplate the nature of the world he was in, without getting caught on barbs like his ethnicity, the issue of gun control, and "what if" situations like whether people should have called him out for acting weird or not. But it's not the only perspective, of course.
I had a much larger letter prepared, but I'd rather just boil this down and get to the point:
Yes, Cho deserves much of the responsibility, but once again, the media has failed to turn an important event into a national dialogue. Instead, it has been turned into a very elaborate blame game (surprise.) By now, many have stopped paying attention, which effectively solidifies Cho as a martyr along with Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. He's destined to be brought up again only when the next shooting happens, only to be thought about by angry teens, and only to be considered as a vehicle for gun control debates.
Meanwhile, nobody thinks twice about analyzing the psychological and sociological aspects of Cho's life. Is that because it becomes too personal? Would that lead to conflicting feelings of sympathy and anger towards him? Would we find answers or would it end up fruitless?
I don't know, but I know the current path is fairly empty. This isn't the kind of event to dismiss, yet I feel like it's already beginning to slip away.
Just my thoughts, James Moskovic (jmoskovic@gmail.com)
8 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Fans of Waits will not be disappointed
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
SPRING SUBLET: 1 bedroom in 2 bedroom at the Aberdeen. Rent negotiable. Email arkramer@wisc.edu
GENTLE WOMEN...THROUGH the lens of Douglas J. Nesbit, newly released book now available for holiday gifts! www.gentlewomen.us



IP hash: 9eed8a43
“Meanwhile, nobody thinks twice about analyzing the psychological and sociological aspects of Cho's life. Is that because it becomes too personal? Would that lead to conflicting feelings of sympathy and anger towards him? Would we find answers or would it end up fruitless?”
Perhaps it is because there is no point in intellectually masturbating over a topic with absolutely no clear conclusion.
IP hash: 70642d0d
“Yes, Cho deserves much of the responsibility…”
Much? MUCH??? Cho was the nutjob that bought the guns and pulled the trigger. But I guess the “Doctor” that didn’t put him in the locked ward deserves partial blame.
IP hash: de692621
Psychological tests for everyone!
What do you see in this ink blot?
Weapons of mass destruction, terrorism and Liberal baby-eaters? Ahh, you’re either a Republican or a paranoid schizophrenic.
IP hash: dd3a0dcb
Let’s analyze this. Judging from the type of person Cho was, wouldn’t you have made ridiculed and ostracized him too? He was weird and had no life. You wouldn’t have been his friend either.
IP hash: 9be1af0d
Well of course discussion about the shooting is not over! People keep writing articles about it! Duh!
IP hash: 9be1af0d
“Judging from the type of person Cho was, wouldn’t you have made ridiculed and ostracized him too? He was weird and had no life. You wouldn’t have been his friend either.”
Well, maybe if he wasn’t persecuted by the “cool people” then maybe he wouldn’t have withdrawn completely into a fantasy world. Some folks think they’re just too cool to share this existence with anyone else. I’m glad there are people like Cho running around keeping the “cool people” on their toes.
I don’t care if I turn anybody off with this post. I thought it was just plain cool what he did and I hope others like him follow.
IP hash: 76ce7999
I wasn’t one of the cool kids. I fought with the bullies, and was made fun of, and all the regular kid stuff. Difference? I shoot at artificial targets on a range, and go hunting with my guns, rather then go Grand Theft Auto on a university campus.
I’ll bet Cho knew what he was doing was moraly wrong. The difference between him and everyone else is that little part in his brain that blocks thoughts such as “I should kill them all” (and we’ve all had similar thoughts), from turning into the action of violence was broken. Much like a rabid dog, the only way to stop this behavior is either Isolate the rabid dog (broken human) early on after you start to realize something isn’t right, or you wait until it looks like someone is about to get bit, and you try to put the rabid animal down before it does to much damage (realy hard to do in a gun free zone, isn’t it?)
Analyze it all you want. Try to discover why something like this happens. Maybe you can socialy re-enginer the entire human population on this planet to avoid these problems. Or, maybe you’ll just find a new way to break even more peoples brians. Chances are though, you’ll recognize that someone is that mentaly unstable until after something horible happens.
IP hash: e7c5f3c1
April 26, 2007 @ 12:55pm Think about what you are saying. I wrote the article this letter responds to as a way to help people understand what happened and more importantly offer people like you a chance to look in the mirror and see yourself for what you are.
You have a lot of hatred. Please take a step back and think about what you are saying.