Opinion
Iran’s policy on nukes flawed
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Gerald Cox:
- Options poor in county race (April 6, 2009)
- AIG sparks Congress' ignorance (March 22, 2009)
- Same old strategies won't save republicanism (March 2, 2009)
- Black leaders won't let America's racist heritage go (February 23, 2009)
- ASM constitution will not succeed without students (February 19, 2009)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
As if the Persian Gulf wasn't volatile enough. Iran, never known for its sagacity in diplomacy, has recently decided to test the turbulent waters of the Gulf. Iran's latest blunder — the seizure of 15 British sailors and marines on the northwestern extremity of the Persian Gulf at the mouth of the Shatt Al-Arab waterway — has the European Union and Britain up in arms. If Iran is still interested in sneaking a few nukes out of its nuclear energy program, it really is doing a rather lousy job of looking innocuous.
Iran is increasingly looking like the irresponsible teenager who wants the keys to the car for the night. Unfortunately, teenage Iran has evinced a determined tendency to purposefully run his bicycle, moped and jet skis into innocent bystanders, pedestrians and the occasional sea whale, all the while yelling obscenities and frequent anti-Semitic remarks. Wanton violence and aggressive behavior? Keep the keys out of this kid's hands.
Iran's seizure of British sailors is quickly turning into an international my-word versus your-word situation. Iran claims the British ships were in Iranian waters, while the British response has asserted that the seizure took place in Iraqi waters. According to MSNBC, a nearby Iraqi fisher even got into the fray, insisting the boats were anchored in Iraqi waters.
So, who to believe? Is it Iran, a nation known for its censorship and manipulative control of information? A nation whose president seems to deny the historicity of the Holocaust? Or do we believe Great Britain, a nation that somehow managed to get itself into a war based on misinformation — a war that very well may be the next Vietnam. Perhaps you'll side with the Iraqi fisherman. He seems like a nice guy.
This incident brings to light the rather large question that plagues the Iranian nuclear issue. Who should we believe?
Iran claims its nuclear program has been, is, and will always be for peaceful purposes. America and its allies insist the Islamic republic has much more hostile intentions in mind, and Iran is providing the West with myriad examples to point to Iran's violent disposition. If Iran truly desires to exercise its right to peaceful nuclear energy, it sure is acting funny.
Iran is often cited as a major supplier and contributor to the Hezbollah terrorist group in Palestine, and the United States and Great Britain have been insisting that Shiite insurgent groups in Iraq are reaping the benefits of doting neighbor Iran. Supplying terrorist groups like Hezbollah and the violent civilian slaughterers in Iraq is no way to instill confidence that, should you achieve nuclear capabilities, you're more than happy to leave nuclear warheads sitting around, unused for a few decades, Cold-War style.
Iran is not helping its peaceful intentions case by taking the provocative actions it took on Friday. It also isn't helping its image as a peaceful, mindful, responsible member of the international community by hosting the world's largest Holocaust-denier conference, boasting some of the world's foremost white supremacists and at least one former Ku Klux Klan leader. This conference, by the way, wasn't just a gathering of Iranian intellectuals and academics. It was attended by and enjoyed an address from President Ahmadinejad himself.
The veritable kidnapping of 15 British sailors in what the European Union and Britain believe to be international waters, is yet another example of Iran's bungling diplomacy in the wake of its nuclear ambitions. And with their refusal to comply with the United Nations' expectations concerning their nuclear program, Iran is working itself into a corner.
The world is losing faith in Iran. The United Nations Security Council unanimously passed additional sanctions against Iran aimed at curbing its arming of insurgencies in Iraq and at crippling its nuclear program. All 15 permanent and temporary members of the Security Council managed to come together to indicate to Iran that they don't trust them.
You can't fault Iran for trying, really. After all, we have nukes, Israel must have nukes, and India managed to make a few. For goodness' sake, Pakistan has them! So why shouldn't Iran? President Ahmadinejad, best known for his vitriolic and oft-mistranslated rants against Israel, the United States and the West must figure nuclear weapons are governed by the same rules that defined our preschool and grade-school experiences. If everyone else gets to have a snack and a nap, we should too, right?
Unfortunately for Mr. Ahmadinejad, the world doesn't operate on the kindergarten system for nuclear weapon distribution. It's not snack time or naptime for Iran. No, Iran's got this whole nuclear ambitions thing all wrong. If Iran wants nukes, it would be best served by behavior that is conducive to powers like the Great Britain, the United States, and the United Nations turning a blind eye to their actions. And its abrasive stance of aggression is just rubbing a few too many members of the United Nations the wrong way. Everybody is watching, and nobody is trusting.
Gerald Cox (gcox@badgerherald.com) is a junior majoring in economics and Middle Eastern Studies.
12 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Fans of Waits will not be disappointed
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
SPRING SUBLET: 1 bedroom in 2 bedroom at the Aberdeen. Rent negotiable. Email arkramer@wisc.edu
GENTLE WOMEN...THROUGH the lens of Douglas J. Nesbit, newly released book now available for holiday gifts! www.gentlewomen.us
IP hash: f32892d5
worthless stuff here… especially resembeling Iran to the teenager was very “teenagerish”
IP hash: b7d19b35
It seems that Gerald could use help of a tutor in his Meddle Eastern Studies.
IP hash: 5de2801e
Isn’t saying that Iran’s policy on nukes is flawed along the lines of saying “Farts smell?”
IP hash: 8adc1017
Anonymous (March 25, 2007 @ 11:27pm): Spelling ? Syntax ? Tutor yourself !
IP hash: de692621
PAKISTAN HAS NUKES! Your “snack time” for nukes began YEARS ago. Dammit, we say we’re concerned about Iran getting nuclear weapons and distributing them to terrorists, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FORMER SOVIET STATES? There is unsecured nuclear material everywhere.
Ahmadinejad is a camera monkey. Tell me what the real leader of Iran is saying, the Ayatollah.
IP hash: 9e315c19
Anonymous 3:09 am…great come back. The way you make an argument is to say he can’t spell, great job. It must be Cox trying to get a point in, because his articles always suck. Not to mention that since he’s a liberal that the only come backs that they ever have online are “check your spelling, I hope you don’t go to UW cause your spelling sucks”
IP hash: c8ec50bd
“Iran's policy on nukes flawed”
Uh, yes, Gerald, we’re are certainly aware of that.
IP hash: 70642d0d
“Iran is not helping its peaceful intentions case…”
Only an idiot would think that Iran has peaceful intentions.
IP hash: 7fe5a554
historicity?
If this is a word…it shouldn’t be.
IP hash: 70642d0d
“Iran is increasingly looking like the irresponsible teenager who wants the keys to the car for the night.”
More like the teen-age gang member looking to get a MAC-10, so he could do some real damage in a drive-by shooting. He already steals a car if he needs one. Car-jacking is an old and honored tradition.
IP hash: 213641d5
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/historicity
http://www.answers.com/topic/historicity
IP hash: fcf2c87a
All I have to say is that I loved the article. If you all didn’t like it, why don’t you: go hit up the Badger Herald offce, apply for a spot, and then write your own pointless articles. Thanks Gerald for a great read!