OPINION & EDITORIAL
State should help Minnesotans pay
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Jason Smathers:
- Your Christmas gift: Lighten up! (December 13, 2007)
- America in dire need of education on gender identity (December 7, 2007)
- Getting off or going down: Is porn destructive? (December 5, 2007)
- Catholic group deserves funding, at least for now (November 28, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Over the borderline (January 29, 2007)
- Ed Board right on Barrows (April 21, 2006)
- A solution for the uninsured? (March 12, 2003)
- Ziegler absurdly corrupt; vote Clifford (March 21, 2007)
- Tuition, salary changes good for UW (February 16, 2006)
by Jason Smathers
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Fairness? I've never seen it practiced perfectly, especially not in education. However, you can get close. Wisconsin and Minnesota can achieve fairness by renegotiating the reciprocity agreement. However, Wisconsin is being a little stubborn. So much so, that fairness could collapse into disaster for students from both states.
If you're a Minnesota student in Wisconsin or vice versa, you have a pretty good deal. Students are given the opportunity to use the opposite state's school and still pay the tuition of a comparable school in his or her home state. Although other neighboring state's students (for example, Illinois) pay strangling fees to come to Madison, Minnesota residents pay what they would to go to the University of Minnesota's Twin Cities campus.
Minnesota legislators and U of M administrators have argued the gap between Minnesota and Wisconsin tuition (Minnesota's is higher) is too great to be fair to Minnesota residents seeking educational opportunities in Wisconsin. They suggested we raise our tuition. Wisconsin legislators were not exactly accommodating in their response. Once Minnesota legislators said they might become involved in the situation, Wisconsin lawmakers balked at the suggestion of paying even more to compensate Minnesota. What's worse is that some talked about simply ending the deal.
So should we raise tuition to keep the deal? The question to answer before that is whether we are competing or cooperating with our westward neighbors. When it comes to education, the goal of both states is the same. As a nation, we have tried to attain equal educational access for students, and cost has been the biggest obstacle. This agreement helps some students get around that roadblock. Yet, that doesn't mean we should disadvantage state residents trying to get into their own state school.
However, there is a contradictory nature to the argument legislators are making. The reciprocity agreement is supposed to offer greater educational access and options to students from both states. However, when the agreement needs to be renegotiated, state legislators and an editorial in this very paper argue the Wisconsin system of education has an obligation to educate Wisconsin residents. It's all about us.
Wisconsin doesn't want to give. Like that child who dives hands first into the waterfall of candy from a piñata, Wisconsin legislators recognize the gifts in front of them, but refuse to give up any of them. However, if we don't give a little leeway, the result could be much more disastrous than a tuition increase.
This reciprocity agreement cannot end. There were more than 25,000 students who took advantage of the agreement and attended school in their neighboring state. If the agreement ends, the options and space becomes more limited. If that happens, a good deal of high school and college graduates will be forced to cut their education short. That means cutting off Wisconsin residents from the educational opportunities we promise them. We have been sailing in a sea of benefits, but we are running the risk of turning it into two separate puddles.
Some Wisconsinites groan at making great leaps to accommodate students from Minnesota, but they won't have to. Assessing an increase in the tuition surcharge fee might help balance things. Minnesota residents pay the amount of their own state school to come to Madison schools, but Wisconsin residents pay that number plus 25 percent of the difference in tuition to come to U of M-Twin Cities (usually an extra $400). If the issue of where reciprocity payments are actually is a problem, attach them to tuition of all students going into Minnesota and increase the U of M-Twin Cities rate. The agreement will raise costs for Wisconsin residents going to Minnesota schools, but the tradeoff ensures that funds go to the Minnesota system to invest back into education. Hopefully, that investment will result in slowing down tuition increases at Minnesota and closing the tuition gap between both college systems.
While tuition is a major issue, our approach to this university should also be examined. A visiting professor once remarked to another student and me that Madison has an amazing university but that we shouldn't. He reminded us that we should be thankful that we have such a stellar school at such a low price. We have it good in this state, but we shouldn't want to keep it to ourselves. This is a nationally — dare I say, internationally — renowned university and as such it should be open to those with the grades and determination to succeed here. It belongs to the state but should offer an outstretched hand to those looking for a promising education, regardless of location. We may be divided by states, but are connected by the pursuit of happiness.
Yes, educational access is hard to come by, and it's not fair. It's unlikely that it ever will be. However, our agreement with Minnesota has opened opportunities to both states. If we want to keep progressing toward educational equilibrium, we have to make some concessions. It is not about state pride or political posturing; it is about the access for all. Borders need not apply.
Jason Smathers (jsmathers@wisc.edu) is a junior majoring in history and journalism.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 7:19am):
It's simple - raise Wisconsin tuition to at least match Minnesota.
BTW, if you continue to charge low rent you will eventually be low rent.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 7:26am):
Um, sympathy for Minnesota? I suggest they shut up or else pay out of state tuition. Shutting up is a good first step.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 8:28am):
are you kidding me?
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 10:04am):
Maybe Minnesota should stop giving Wisconsin students all these breaks, since Wisconsin is just a state full of self-centered twits.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 11:07am):
Maybe Minnesota should continue giving Wisconsin kids "all these breaks" -- those Wisconsinites who choose U of M over UW-Madison are getting a worse education, after all. The price difference seems only fair.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 11:09am):
Minnesota benefits more from this deal than Wisconsin. So unless you vikings want to be shipped back, stop complaining.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 11:34am):
Wisconsin already pays the difference back to Minnesota. Just last year Wisconsin paid Minnesota $6.5 million to make up for the discrepancy. Minnesota state universities are complaining because the money goes to the state itself, not directly to the universities. This is a problem between Minnesota state universities and the Minnesota state government, not the universities and Wisconsin. Wisconsin should not be forced to accomodate Minnesota, when the problem is an internal issue.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 11:44am):
You could start by at least mentioning that WI does re-imburse MN for the difference and then argue the merits of how that money is allocated...
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 3:05pm):
to the 11:44 comment:
Yes, WI does reimburse Minnesota through reciprocity payments, but it isn't assured to go back into the university. Attach it to student tuition of Wisconsinites going in and you have it going straight to UM rather than waiting for it to trickle down through the state.
Anonymous (February 27, 2007 @ 3:55pm):
Let me get this straight, Minnesota legislature is screwing the Minnesota university?
How is this a Wisconsin problem? Wisconsin has it's own legislature which is screwing the Wisconsin university problem to deal with first.
Anonymous (March 1, 2007 @ 11:46am):
Minnesota would be in shambles if not for UW graduates living there. It's a good deal for Minnesotans, but compromises the quality of the UW by letting Minnesotans in. Therefore, I understand why Wisconsin doesn't want this deal.
Add a comment
We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.
Login...
Not registered? Sign up now.
It's quick, free, and the email address you provide will not be sold or solicited.
