Opinion
U.S. should re-evaluate rocky relationship with Pakistan
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Joe Trovato:
- High taxes hamper Milwaukee growth (March 11, 2008)
- Miller a keystone of Old Milwaukee (February 27, 2008)
- Naysayers beware: McCain GOP's best choice for presidency (February 11, 2008)
- HillaryCare veils socialist disaster (January 29, 2008)
- America, treat Russia with some respect (December 5, 2007)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
As the United States finds itself embroiled in a global war on terrorism that is spreading across many nations, it is time to re-evaluate just exactly who our real friends are. It is now clear that Pakistan is not one of them.
Since the beginning of the war on terror in October 2001, Pakistan has claimed to be a staunch supporter of the American objective to root out and defend against al-Qaida and Taliban forces fleeing Afghanistan. Pakistani leader General Musharraf has continually promised that his country would never become a sanctuary for terrorist refugees and that he would work hand-in-hand with the U.S. government to eliminate any safe haven for insurgents.
But as the old saying goes, actions speak louder than words. So what has Pakistan really been doing behind the scenes?
With Taliban resistance stiffening in the past few months, it has become clear Pakistan's embattled border province of Baluchistan has become a staging ground for Taliban and al-Qaida forces launching assaults on Afghani and American forces. General Musharraf has assured the United States time and again that his government is firmly committed to rooting out insurgents in the Afghani-Pakistani border regions. Yet now the truth about Pakistan's real position seems to be leaking out.
Of course, Pakistan's primary concern in the region has always been countering its nemesis, India. To most Pakistanis, the Northern Alliance was seen as a pro-Indian faction. Thus, having the Taliban in power was actually beneficial to Pakistanis.
After 9/11, the United States and Pakistan entered into somewhat hasty negotiations as the U.S. military prepared for war in Afghanistan. Because of U.S. pressure and the fear that the United States would ally itself with India instead, Pakistan was in effect forced to comply with American demands to cease its support of the Taliban and pursue al-Qaida leaders. Nevertheless, underneath it all, Pakistan's interests still remained the same.
According to Barnett Rubin of Foreign Affairs, "Supporting the Taliban was so important to Pakistan that Musharraf even considered going to war with the United States rather than abandon his allies in Afghanistan."
The Pakistani military had spent years supporting the Taliban in their common border areas, and Musharraf even lobbied to Washington in an attempt to install a "moderate Taliban" regime in Afghanistan instead of letting the Northern Alliance take over.
In the end, Musharraf reluctantly agreed to "cooperate" with the United States out of fear of the United States aligning itself with India instead. In turn, the United States allowed for the safe return of hundreds of Pakistani intelligence agents and military officers from Afghanistan.
This avenue of escape cleared the way for many Taliban and al-Qaida fighters to find refuge in Pakistan, where they could lick their wounds and regroup. The Pakistani government has done little to counter this influx of terrorists and Taliban agents into their country, and thus, five years later, the Taliban has reconstituted itself as a real threat to the security of the fledgling government in Afghanistan.
The border region has returned to a state of chaos and warfare with the Taliban launching offensive after offensive. While none has been successful, it is obvious that the refuge provided in Pakistan has made real victory over the Taliban nearly impossible.
Also in Foreign Affairs, James Jones, a Marine general, stated that the Taliban headquarters is in Quetta, Pakistan. It is also widely believed that this is the same region in which Osama bin Laden has found sanctuary.
The most disturbing reports are those involving direct Pakistani aid to Taliban militias. Intelligence reports have provided strong evidence that ISI, Pakistan's intelligence agency, has been providing sanctuary and rearming Taliban forces, a report that Pakistani officials sternly deny.
But according to a document leaked to the BBC by Great Britain's Defense Academy, a think tank run by Britain's Ministry of Defense, "Pakistan (through the ISI) has been supporting terrorism and extremism — whether in London on 7/7 or in Afghanistan or Iraq."
Washington politicians seem to be perfectly willing to accept what the Pakistani government has been telling them. Afghani President Karzai has repeatedly warned the United States that the Pakistani government is fueling the Taliban insurgency, yet the United States continues to claim that the problem is being dealt with and that Musharraf is a friend of the coalition.
Whether or not it is true that high-ranking officials in the Pakistani government are actively aiding the Taliban is a serious question to consider, but according to Foreign Affairs, Pakistani leaders are perfectly able to disrupt the Taliban, and they are choosing not to.
Unfortunately, Washington continues to cover for Pakistan because it does not want to lose its only ally in the region. But if Pakistan will not even put forth an effort to corral the Taliban that runs rampant within its own borders, then it is obvious that the United States cannot consider Pakistan a true ally. Either way, there is no way that Pakistan should be receiving any kind of military or economic support until they get tough on the Taliban.
Joe Trovato (jtrovato@wisc.edu) is a freshman majoring in journalism. Sources
13 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
If Pakistan is supporting Taliban why is it
the Taliban insurgents killed 700 Pakistani soldiers in the tribal zone last year, which is more than all the Western casualties in Afghanistan since 2001. Taliban suicide bombers killed 42 Pakistani soldiers two months ago in Mardan, and another four Pakistani soldiers were killed last week.
This hardly demonstrates a patron- client relationship between Pakistan and the Taliban. At least four assassination attempts have been made on President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan. Do these facts back the idea that Pakistan supports and colludes with the Taliban?
A bit more research before writing articles might be a good idea!
totally biased and pathetically misfinformed, this anlaysis I mean.
Anonymous (February 8, 2007 @ 7:00am) would you like to elaborate?
I trust Pakistan, because they have nuclear bombs. Only good countries deserve them; only good, stable countries have them. Iranians, on the other hand, are baby-eating terrorists. Pakistanis give me foot rubs.
The author views are based on reading stories in the media, not a reliable source considering modern media is about generating controversy and attacks. The British think tank he cited itself rejects the leaked document.
The Taliban were never defeated, they simply withdrew to the countryside. Add to this the failure of the Afghan govt and the tiny number of American troops in Afghanistan uptill 2 years ago, and you will get a better picture of why Afghanistan is in flames.
lets just nuke that whole area and get this over with. im sick of it.
shut up
anonymous...maybe taliban are killing pakistani soldiers because they want pakistan to withdraw their official support of the US
History lesson for Joe boy:
Let me remind that it was US that did the first blood in Afganistan not Pakistan. They started this whole mess so called save the "humanity" from the commis. When Russian invaded Afganistan, it was CIA who came to Pakistan and created their best friends like Bin laden and Mujahidins in Afganistan. Who are the Talibans? They used to be Mujahidins. They are the same people who are wearing different hat/turbon. This is what you people never tell your nation the truth. Then they dumped 4 millions Afgan refugee on Pakistan side and left them high and dry. Their culture/society has been totaly destroyed. Drugs, guns and mafia have infested in Pak society. No one came to help Pakistan when a friend needed help from a friend. It was only China, Pakistan could rely on and they did. No matter what, Pakistan will never ever trust the US. After all this cr*P Pakistan has to go through, you are trying to justify the relationship. US owe big time to Pakistan......shame on you.
rehash of nonsense, plain and simple. by the way did you pass your exams.
\\\my dear......you are so very concerned about the role of Pakistan in screwed up so called war against terrorism,,,but for hell sake,,,did you ever try to see the obvious bouble standards of US...have you ever been concerned about the US lust for oil which has made US establishment a bunch of \Greedy Oil Snatchers for their survival and elimination of all opthers,,,,have you ever thought that how Israili intellects and policy makings are pushing you all americans in hell for the sake of saving their own ass,,,,pity,,,when u know this all,,time wuld be over by then and u ll only regret,,BEWARE of that time wwhen 1 and half billion MUSLIMS will get up and snatch everything from u which u have grabbed in the garb of GWOT,
I am sure that writer did not research on the topic he discussed in his artical.