The Badger Herald

OPINION & EDITORIAL

Readers summon inner demons

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Online Comments:

Exploring the issues: Religion - Your responses (November 30, 2007)
Exploring the issues: Race - Your online responses (November 16, 2007)
Readers take it to the house (November 9, 2007)
Readers demand R-E-S-P-E-C-T (November 2, 2007)
Readers seek satisfaction (October 26, 2007)

by Online Comments

Friday, January 26, 2007

In response to "Bush U.N. nominee religiously unique, has some old ideas" by Gerald Cox:

Could someone on this paper please do an article on the difference between neo-cons and archeo-cons? between the OLD and NEW conservatives? between the false and true conservatives? Because if foreign policy is what defines conservatives in your viewpoint, then you need to take some history lessons.

In response to "Corporate America regains credibility by rewarding successful CEOs" by Mike Skelly:

You get what you pay for; the chief executive (president) of the United States makes $400,000. As you can see, we are getting some high quality leadership/ decision making.

In response to "Mayoral race crucial for U.S. security" by Will Sandstrom:

You're running for mayor of Madison, not God.

In response to "Escalation ignores Iraqi demands" by Jeff Carnes:

If we just stay a few more months, Iraq will be perfect. I heard the cotton-candy trees are starting to bud and the unicorns are slowly returning. Once they figure out how to keep the chocolate houses from melting, then we can withdraw.

In response to "Judge represents students, deserves your vote for alder" by Eli Lewien:

And the questions lobbed out there for Eli: 'How are you going to represent the campus gay community?' 'What labor unions have endorsed you?' 'Can you name three speakers who spoke at College Dems meetings last year?'

Feedback

Show all comments

Hide anonymous comments

Anonymous (January 26, 2007 @ 9:32am):

oh, shut the hell up, bashing eli.
"if you get on the council, it'll be all white again, how can you justify that?"
BULLSHIT! Even woods pointed out that was total bs!

Anonymous (January 26, 2007 @ 10:57am):

I think they're bashing the absurdity of the College Dems endorsement meeting and process more than Eli. Otherwise they would have written his answers, too.

Anonymous (January 27, 2007 @ 3:25pm):

It's not absurd to the MEMBERS of the College Democrats. Only absurd to the Ashok Kumar non-Democrats who wanted to steal the endorsement.

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.