The Badger Herald

OPINION & EDITORIAL

Escalation ignores Iraqi demands

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Jeff Carnes:

Gay frat diversifies Greeks (May 4, 2007)
Problems in city's environment vast (April 26, 2007)
State budget must keep UW in mind (April 19, 2007)
Students should take responsiblity for credit card debts (April 12, 2007)
State must confront brain drain issue (March 29, 2007)

by Jeff Carnes

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Americans take for granted that when you flip a switch, the lights will come on. When we watched the Capital One Bowl, it did not even enter our minds that the television may kick off at any time, along with the microwave, alarm clocks and electric heaters.

In Baghdad, the electricity can — and will — shut off at any time. This is due to the fact that during the week of Dec. 28, Baghdad averaged only 5.4 hours of electricity per day, according to the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs of the Department of State.

When Coalition Forces occupied Iraq in 2003, they brought the promise of a better future. Keeping the lights and the air conditioning on when it is a scorching 100 degrees in July is essential to make Iraq a livable place. In a socialist state like Iraq, the average person is dependent on the state for everything, including health care, funding pensions and even timely delivery of rations. If Americans were forced to live like Iraqis, they would be calling everyone from MG&E to Congress, especially during a heat wave. For Iraqis, many have decided to take up arms against the inept Iraqi government.

Last November’s election proved that Americans are not happy with the lack of progress in Iraq. In a speech Jan. 10, President Bush admitted that there have been mistakes in Iraq, including too few troops on the ground and a strategy that has tied the hands of those serving there. The proposed solution by President Bush is sending 20,000 troops to Iraq in a troop surge before turning over security of all 18 governates to the Iraqis. This is in addition to the Iraqi government spending $10 billion of its own money for reconstruction projects.

This plan creates two problems. The first is that the military is already near a breaking point. On Jan. 11, the Pentagon announced that it had canceled the rule that stated reservists and National Guard soldiers could only be deployed two years out of every five. In January 2005, then Army Chief of the Army Reserve Lieutenant General James Helmly stated that “overuse” of the Reserves in Iraq and Afghanistan would lead to a “broken force.” While the Department of Defense claims there is no problem with enlistment and retention of active duty troops, the Pentagon’s plan of extending the use of already overextended reservists and National Guard soldiers shows that there just are not enough troops to send to Iraq, let alone Afghanistan, Iran or Darfur. The Army, National Guard and Reserve may break under current deployment timetables sooner rather than later.

More importantly, President Bush’s plan does not address the true problem in Iraq: Why do the Iraqis insist on shooting each other rather than working together to build a better future? A major reason is the fact that most Iraqis do not have the basic necessities like clean water and electricity. When Coalition forces invaded Iraq, they inherited a tattered infrastructure. The United States, however, has not invested nearly enough in what Iraqis need — the World Bank estimates that $12 billion is needed to fix the electrical infrastructure in Iraq. As of Jan. 3, the United States has contributed less than $3 billion.

It is difficult to fix Iraqis’ power lines when they are constantly blown up. Few major headlines, however, look at why they are being blown up in the first place. There is not enough electricity or jobs, and there is the constant fear that American troops could be banging down your door at any time. When someone propositions an Iraqi man in this position to do something he would not normally do for more money than he could make on the street, too often it is an offer he cannot refuse.

The solution to Iraq lies in partially fixing the security situation so there is a stable environment in which the economy can grow. Security will never be established, however, until enough Iraqis are secure economically and have a real incentive to put down their arms. Troop increases have been used with minimal success due to the fact that the foot soldiers in the insurgencies and militias do not have adequate reason to stop fighting.

The solution to Iraq is not easy, but it is not found with more troops. The solution lies with more State Department Provincial Reconstruction Teams working in conjunction with the Iraqi government to build the Iraqi infrastructure and create an environment in which Iraqis can live the lives we promised them when we invaded in 2003.

Jeff Carnes (jcarnes@badgerherald.com) is a senior majoring in linguistics.

Feedback

Show all comments

Hide anonymous comments

Anonymous (January 22, 2007 @ 12:32pm):

If we just stay a few more months, Iraq will be perfect. I heard the cotton-candy trees are starting to bud and the unicorns are slowly returning. Once they figure out how to keep the chocolate houses from melting, then we can withdraw.

Anonymous (January 22, 2007 @ 2:22pm):

Dear Citizens of Iraq,

Do you really think the United States has run dry on evil dictators to install as your new "president?" Obviously, you are unable to appreciate the freedom that you were granted and chose to abuse it. Your trial membership to freedom is about to expire. As of June 1, 2007, King Asshole I will be your new evil overlord. Having thoughts about misbehaving will be punishable by torture and death.

Love,
George W.

Anonymous (January 22, 2007 @ 3:51pm):

Lets just nuke the mideast and get this over with. We are going to have to nuke Iran and Syria anyway, might as well kill two birds with one stone.

Anonymous (February 5, 2007 @ 8:21am):

Well, not to sound like an anti-democrat (which I am), but if you'll recall Billy Bob Clinton pretty much cut our Army to a skeleton crew while refusing to deal with the terrorists that were bombing us around the world (Tanzania, Dar es salam, the USS Cole, etc.). He literaly cut HUMINT (Human Intelligence) so far that they Army actually paid qualified linguists to leave the Army. This happened while allowing SadDAM Insane to continue to give the middle finger to the US and the world indicating he thought Clinton was number one for allowing oil for food scandals and all to happen. Of course nobody wanted to talk about it then since the economy was doing OK. Now look at the economy doing very well and the liberal left media doesn't even mention it. Do you live in a leftist state? We were going to have to deal with Iraq sooner or later, and at least we have someone with the nads to do it. Any war could have been handled better if you really think about it. This one is no exception. It would be very interesting if ole Al Gore or John Kerry had won to see their wimpness in the world at this point. But of course the media would try to say they are great as they cut our military further and turn a blind eye to the evil in the world til it comes to thier house.

Add a comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please keep your feedback thoughtful, on-topic and respectful. Offensive language, personal attacks, or irrelevant comments may be deleted.