OPINION & EDITORIAL
Pony up, partner
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:
- A security fee-for-all (December 11, 2007)
- Farewell, Chancellor (December 10, 2007)
- $$FC (December 6, 2007)
- In a bind (December 5, 2007)
- Entitlement Town (December 4, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Significant benefits (April 12, 2007)
- 11th out of 10 (February 14, 2005)
- UW must invest in partner benefits (April 10, 2007)
- Students essential in defeating ban (October 5, 2006)
- Partner benefits easily outweigh costs (April 18, 2005)
by Badger Herald Editorial Board
Thursday, November 30, 2006
The University of Wisconsin Board of Regents might rally when they meet next Thursday to ensure System employees receive domestic partner benefits. We strongly support the effort to make change — UW needs to compete with schools across the country for the best employees, and it is clear that a lack of domestic-partner benefits is having an effect on faculty retention and recruitment. UW is the only Big Ten school to deny employees the offering and will struggle to retain quality staff by failing to support their partners' needs.
Several roadblocks stand in the way of domestic partner benefits becoming a reality, however.
Wisconsin statutes restrict state employees from receiving domestic partner benefits, so the Legislature would have to pass new state laws to allow it. As the UW System's relationship with the Capitol has historically been tumultuous at best, the regents vying for a substantial change without further support from other state agencies could prove fruitless. The system needs to gather support to show legislators that Wisconsin cannot continue to ignore domestic partners.
Beyond the legality of the issue, the high cost of extending benefits to couples both gay and straight, as well as the difficulty of creating a clear definition of domestic partnership stand in the way of the regents' success. The system can clearly follow other schools' leads, however, to overcome those barriers eventually.
If the Legislature is unwilling to cooperate, UW must seek any alternative possible to provide for a serious gap in compensation that is pushing talent to other universities at a rapidly increasing rate. Perhaps through private donations the administration could somehow provide domestic partner benefits for the system's flagship university.
To keep up with competitors and stay afloat in the national struggle to be the best of the best, UW needs to provide domestic partner benefits. We urge the regents to seek whatever means necessary to ensure a positive future for UW — either by collaborating with state agencies and garnering statewide support for change or by bypassing the state altogether.
