Quantcast

Currently: Fair and 58° F

OPINION & EDITORIAL

Death penalty reveals racial woes

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Guest Columnist:
Related Stories:
by Guest Columnist
Wednesday, October 25, 2006

On Nov. 7, Wisconsin voters will go to the polls not only to determine who will control the House and Senate and not only to decide whether Wisconsin joins the loathsome company of states with amendments banning gay marriage. Voters will also be deciding on an advisory referendum on whether Wisconsin should reinstate the death penalty. I use the word reinstate because Wisconsin did, in fact, have the death penalty at one period in our history. That period ended in 1858, granting Wisconsin the honor of being the state that has been death-penalty-free longer than any other in the Union. It would be a terrible shame if we lost this honor Nov. 7.

It would be an act of criminal legislation if our Legislature were to bring back a law whose abolition predated that of slavery. Two special features of Wisconsin law make our state peculiarly ill suited for a reintroduction of the death penalty. First, we already have a lower murder rate than any state that currently imposes the death penalty. Restarting the machinery of death would do nothing to lower our crime rate. Second, and even more disturbing, we have the nation's highest black incarceration rate. This means Wisconsin imprisons a higher proportion of its black citizens than any other state.

Other aspects of our criminal "justice" system bear out this disgusting trend: More blacks than whites go to prison for parole violations, and whites typically get sent to prison for violent crimes, while 67 times as many blacks as whites go to prison for drug-related crimes. The fact of the matter is that Wisconsin's legal system is racist to the core.

If Wisconsin were to reinstate the death penalty, the massive injustice of our own court system would be combined with the obscene racism of the death penalty. Nationally, blacks make up about 12 percent of the population, but consist of 42 percent of those on death row. Even though blacks and whites make up roughly even percentages of murder victims, 80 percent of those on death row went for murdering a white person. In the 30 years since the death penalty was reinstated nationally, of the over 1,000 people executed, only 12 whites have been executed for murdering an African-American.

Thus, the death penalty in Wisconsin would be a hideous amalgam of the racism of our own courts combined with that of the system as a whole. According to the African-American magazine The Black Commentator, Wisconsin won the rather dubious award last year of being the worst state in the country for blacks to live. Do we really want to give the racism in our state more institutional power?

To those good liberals among my readership who may protest that, with the dedicated efforts of good-hearted people, the racism of the death penalty could be eliminated, I must refer you to the Supreme Court's judgment on the matter. In 1986, in a ruling upholding the death penalty, Justice Lewis Powell opined that racial discrimination in death penalty cases is "an inevitable part of our criminal justice system." More recently, Justice Harry Black wrote that, "Even under the most sophisticated death penalty statutes, race continues to play a major role in determining who shall live and who shall die." The death penalty's intrinsic racism does not stem from the fact that those who run it are racist (though many of them certainly are), but from its being part and parcel, along with the entire criminal justice system, of the machinery of white supremacy in America. The grossly disproportionate incarceration of black men has contributed massively to continuing poverty in the black community. The Black Commentator sums up this process: "Almost one in three 18-year-old black males across the board is likely to catch a felony conviction … A felony conviction in America is a stunningly accurate predictor of a life of insecure employment at poverty-level wages and no health care, of fragile family ties, of low educational attainment and limited or no civic participation, and a strong likelihood of re-imprisonment."

This process is by no means accidental. Politicians have long stirred up racism as a tool for getting votes. Bill Clinton is probably the most disgusting example of this. To prove how tough he was on crime, Clinton flew home to Arkansas in the middle of his 1992 campaign to oversee the execution of Rickey Ray Rector, a mentally retarded black man. Rector was so mentally handicapped that he saved the dessert from his last supper so he could eat it after his execution.

In short, the death penalty is one of the most brutal edges of white supremacy in America today. To reinstate it in Wisconsin would be a criminal expansion of racism in our state.

Paul Heideman is a graduate student in the Department of African-American Studies and a member of the International Socialist Organization


Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 8:59am):

But don't blacks mostly kill other blacks?

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 9:24am):

I think that this article is outrageous! Your opinions are not needed to sway the voters one way or the other. Remember, you are not the only people who are living in Wisconsin, and since this is such an opinionated article - here's mine! I would definitely think twice about committing any crime if there were more severe punishments that would be rendered, and I believe that a lot of people think this way. It is people like you that keep our country as a whole from being a safer place to live because of your views of certain laws. If somebody kills someone (for example) they should have to deal with the consequences (it should actually go back to medieval times - eye for an eye punishments) and I don't think that sitting in prison, eating good food, watching cable tv, and living life better than a lot of "good" Americans, is a well served punishment. Now honestly, DO YOU??

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 10:00am):

So many blacks are in prison because so many blacks commit crimes. Why don't you tell the othe half of the statistics. Blacks are more likely to commit crimes, so of course they are more likely to be in prison. What, should we have a quota on the number of blacks that we are allowed to put in jain. "Well Tyrone, we caught you selling drugs, but we can't arrest you unless we also arrest a white man."

Race aside, death is a just punishment for murder. You can bring up false convictions, but there are certainly cases where there is absolutely no doubt of someon's guilt. Let us remember our very own Jeffery Dalmer. He had the bodies in his apartment! So here is a man you would want to keep alive? You can't possibly justify that. What kind of sick bleeding heart liberal SOB would think that Dalmer had a right to live?

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 10:43am):

To 9:24- So you are currently committing crimes that don't have severe enough penalties? It sounds like you're jealous of prison life too. Perfect, start your crime spree in... 3,2,1, go.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 11:48am):

Interesting article. I hadn't thought about how Wisconsin's "unusual" relationship between justice and race would impact the death penalty.

Well done.

PS: Ignore the comments of those who would fight tooth and nail to deny that racism exists. To admit that others are at a disadvantage, relative to them, dimishes their accomplishments and damages their fragile little egos. So, of course they refuse to see what's obvious to anyone who isn't so blessed.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 12:16pm):

"It sounds like you're jealous of prison life too."

I've regularly seen news of someone commiting a crime so they can get 3 hots and a cot.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 12:47pm):

"What kind of sick bleeding heart liberal SOB would think that Dalmer had a right to live?"

You mean like Thomas Jefferson, who famously wrote "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable RIGHTS, and that among these are LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"?

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness -- it's the FIRST ONE!!! That's an INALIENABLE right -- that means you can't take it away.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 1:17pm):

Here's something going on in Florida http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/10/25/rolling.execution.ap/index.html Yes, I'm sure this man deserves to live. Just one of the many good, honest, decent people that are victims of our racist (note the man is white) justice system. If we're lucky, the governer will let him live, maybe even parole him, and he can live with one of you filthy, bleeding heart liberals.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 1:48pm):

Most murders of blacks are committed by blacks so I guess the law needs to be changed to take into account the race of the muderer.

I guess black on black crime needs to be excused if you want to jail fewer blacks?

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 2:54pm):

you want it to go back to an eye for an eye? seriously? where do you come from?

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 3:05pm):

You don't "catch" a felony conviction. You commit a crime and are thus a felon. People like you who attempt to deflect responsibilty are part of the problem, not the solution.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 4:20pm):

This article was ridiculous. Where are your facts? Yes there is a larger percentage of blacks in prison, but this is because they create a larger percentage of the crimes. You can blame our social structure if that makes you feel better but please don't put such outrageous ideas in our school newspaper, it's embarrassing to UW. Also your quote "Rector was so mentally hadicapped that he saved the desert from his last supper so he could eat it after the execution" is written incredibly poorly. Have you ever interacted with a mentally disabled person? If you had you would never qualify someone as "SO mentally hadicapped" you sound like a valley girl. Mentally handicapped is not an adjetive to be manipulated in that way.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 5:52pm):

"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness "

I'm pretty sure Tom didn't have the right to kill and eat people in mind when he wrote this.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 6:23pm):

Please, anyone, explain to me how killing another person for even the most heinous of crimes is "justice"? How? Why? And no bible verses allowed, K?

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 7:41pm):

We have the right to life? Hmmm, what side of the abortion coin do you fall? Interesting, one who commits murder deserves to live, yet the only "crime" a fetus did was not to exit the birth canal, yet we have the right to decide whether it lives or dies.

Anonymous (October 25, 2006 @ 10:03pm):

If you study criminal law in depth, it is true that African-Americans proportionally commit more crimes than other ethnicities. The issue is that even taking this fact into account, it only accounts for 75-80% of all African Americans in our nation's prison system. The other 20-25% is unexplained by detailed studies (insert accusations of racial bias here).

Both sides are partially right, blacks commit more crimes per capita, but this doesn't explain the total number of blacks in jail when compared to all other ethnicities.

Anonymous (October 26, 2006 @ 4:53pm):

More black people commit crimes, therefore more black people should be punished for them. Race isn't an issue when it comes to crime, other than the fact that blacks simply have a higher crime rate. So maybe 42% of the people on death row are black for a reason. Nobody whines about all the white people blacks kill, but when black murderers get executed for it, because some blacks (and a smaller proportion of whites) are despicable murderous human beings, everyone is up in arms. If blacks don't like it in Wisconsin, there are 49 other states where they can live.

Anonymous (October 29, 2006 @ 5:14pm):

Although Wisconsin enjoys a presence amongst a pantheon of twelve abolitionist states, its neighbour, Michigan, was actually the first state to become legally abolitionist. For any state, however, to pedal historically backward by reconsidering reinstatement of an institution which has been globally repudiated by one hundred twenty-nine nations is both frightening and sad.

I live in California, the political entity within the United States of America with the largest condemned population. As an abolitionist, I and peers look to entities like Wisconsin as models both ethical and political. Please do not squander the prestige currently attributed to Wisconsin and the esteem in which, vis-a-vis its election of nonviolence, it is by fellow Americans held.

Please remain execution free. I wish Wisconsinites courage and success in so doing. In so doing, they will discover a certain modicum of peace.

K. Bandell
(562)864-8957
kjbandell@hotmail.com

Find bars and restaurants! Place a shout-out!
Top Classified Ads (view all)

Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!

DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!

Place a classified ad

Advertising