OPINION & EDITORIAL
Author misinterprets Islam; blames religion for human nature
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Suzanne Zoheri:
- Living options abound for graduates (January 24, 2007)
- Are Egyptian elections actually free? (September 7, 2005)
- Author misinterprets Islam; blames religion for human nature (October 11, 2006)
- Academic thought longing for action (October 17, 2006)
- Racism distracts Israel questions (November 29, 2006)
Related Stories:
- Islamophobia can end by education (November 29, 2007)
- Lessons in Islam (September 18, 2001)
- Education on Islam possible with proper context (March 3, 2003)
- Islam no defense for extremist action (November 20, 2007)
- Cartoon forum hostile, unproductive (February 22, 2006)
by Suzanne Zoheri
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Novels, historical essays and political science students are all scrambling to cash in on the "problems with Islam." Irshad Manji will certainly embrace my criticism of her recent book, "The Problem With Islam; A Muslim's Call for Reform in Her Faith." I am offended that authors are awarded the a priori confidence that their work will be well-founded and warranted and few moderate their greed. Irshad, I am glad you are here. Your words expose a common indulgence in sassy, independent and entertaining characters. A moderate western Muslim immersed in herself and her own definition of mortality is defending the religion she sometimes cannot begin to understand.
Manji, what are you doing to me?
A lesbian Muslim. A religious homosexual attracts attention not for her supposed blasphemy, but for her opaque identity crisis. We can't see clearly through it, but it positions itself a bit more acutely than the average person. Pro-Israeli Palestinians, white anti-Apartheid activists and even Jewish neo-Nazis warp our ideological expectations. Why does the average reader pick up a specific book at the nearest mega-bookstore? "Oooh, Mandy did you hear about that lesbian Muslim?" I hope not to trivialize anything, but Manji deals with a breadth of topics so unfairly that ranting bubbles to the surface during any discourse on her work.
As Manji was preparing to enter Al-Aqsa Mosque, soldiers outside demanded she wear a girdle under her clothes. "The nice Muslim boys stare unrepentantly as I gingerly wiggle into the thing." She makes clear to mention that at the Western Wall, "Not one person ogles, orders me into the linen equivalent of duct tape … " Congratulations Manji, that's convenient.
Having lived in Cairo for a year, I am painfully accustomed to ogling and revolting catcalls — but Islam is not the problem. It would fit nicely in Manji's argument to reason that the Waqf (Trustees of Religious Sights in Islam) members outside of Al-Aqsa mosque are Muslims and the men on the streets of Cairo are Muslim — so Islam promotes catcalling and subjugation of women. Irshad, have you walked the streets in South America? Have you broken your narrow view of the world as a rebellious western Muslim to accumulate reliable information on the social problems within Islamic nations without blaming a religion? I will be the first to admit that catcalling is demeaning, but I will also be the last to say that my religion is at fault.
Manji proudly states that a "majority of the world's refugees spill out from Islamic countries" and then insults us by saying, "If any of this is embarrassing to admit, my fellow Muslims, get over it." The dynamics of Third World development and the impact of Cold War proxy warfare are simply forgotten. Third World countries that have been pumped with ideology, money, weapons and support will most certainly decline into powerful, repressive and corrupt states. Some go as far as to label extreme Islam as a reaction to the ideological vacuum communism left in the Third World, but that debate is best left for a different time.
What incites me more than anything about Manji is not her individual arguments but her taste-of-the-month quality. She dots her harangue with seminal authors on the Middle East and trivializes independent analysts such as Fareed Zakaria, Raja Shehadeh and Muhammed Abu Samra to fit into her recipe for attention. It is clear that problems exist within the Islamic world, but it is Muslims who perpetuate problems outside a realm of practical Islam.
In a visit to American University in Cairo, Karen Armstrong quips, "Religion is very hard to do well." Sociologists, economists, engineers and technological advancement is what all Third World countries need — not more characters ranting about problems they don't have solutions for.
Suzanne Zoheri (smzoheri@wisc.edu) is a senior majoring in history and global cultures.
Anonymous (October 11, 2006 @ 10:51am):
So it's human nature to strap on a bomb belt to kill as many women and children as you can?
Anonymous (October 11, 2006 @ 2:01pm):
Is it human nature to drop bombs on tens of thousands or is it because of our religion?Or is it because the enemy is vaguely evil and we must destroy them because the major news sources for most Americans tell them it must be done.
Anonymous (October 11, 2006 @ 2:04pm):
Our country causes the deaths of so many yet it is never questioned while some are so willing to denounce others as barbarous.I think that a reexamination of evidence is in order.I wonder what will happen when we find that we created this hate by our own actions and that we cannot kill it away.
Anonymous (October 11, 2006 @ 8:27pm):
Islam demands that you submit or die.
Anonymous (November 11, 2006 @ 6:32pm):
She did offer many solutions.
She offered causes besides just human nature.
As a christian I appreciated hearing some real dialogue about Islam instead of what I get in the USA from the media. Any media. As there is nothing. So even though she is gay and obviously very liberal it was still great to see some open honest questioning.
She is getting alot of attention but I think it is good.
Anonymous (November 23, 2006 @ 9:16am):
Suzanne,
Irshad is a brave woman, and although I strongly disagree with her homosexual lifestyle, I cheer her bravery. Who else, and what woman, has ever stood up to the insanity of Islamic extremism--has ever dared to live with threat of death in pursuit of truth? Clearly, Irshad finds something precious within Islam, and her wise gut and mind (and also Allah) tell her that extremism in all of its hate-filled rants is anything but holy, sanctified. It is evil, and it is of Satan, and she alone has the balls to say so. To you, I ask, when will you, now that you have called attention to your own self (and can it be that your own need for attention makes you see the same in Irshad?)--when will you do the same? Can it be that you are jealous of the legacy that Irshad has left, of the trail that she has, with Allah's help, blazed?
Judge not, and be glad that among your ranks is one like Irshad Manji, who may lead many away from darkness, and into the real light of Allah.
Anonymous (November 23, 2006 @ 10:23pm):
Typical response to Irshad. Lets be real she encompasses what's great about Islam not whats wrong. If Islam was 1/10 of her there would be no issues and it would be ruled by women.
Anonymous (December 8, 2006 @ 10:52am):
Dear Suzanne,
While I agree with the general argument you are making, with the claim "Religion is very hard to do well." - I cannot agree. Religion needs to be felt and believed. It is not connected with what you show on outside - religion is not for show, your soul is not for show. Religion and faith are for yourself and you are not supposed to prove your faith to anyone by doing certain "things". Moreover, your actions, consequently, need to be defined by what you believe in. After that, there are two possibilities - if you (and I mean a general "you", naturally) are doing something that is clearly wrong, by any understanding, your actions are simply reflections of what you believe in. After that, the debate is, whether you believe incorrectly, or what you believe in is incorrect, or maybe even in between. Or is there a "correct believing"? It is a very ambiguous subject, and very hard to argue if you want to, at the same time, remain objective.
With this said, I cannot approve terrorism (which, ultimately, seems to be the implied and referred to subject with discussions in Manji's book and in your editorial as well), but I do understand why someone would be compelled to resort to such means. Coming from a third world country, being insanely proud and protective of my culture and religion, and being under the superpower influence (aren't we all), I can understand that. But even if it is understandable, it is not equitable. But this is just as far as an outsider's judgment can go - the rest is up to an individual to battle it out with his/her own consciousness and faith - but not anger and hate.

