Opinion
Letters to the Editor: 4/19/06
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- Clegg absurd, biased on CFACT (May 5, 2009)
- Fund peer tutors (April 28, 2009)
- UW policy consistent with nation (April 23, 2009)
- Biddy's initiative not worth it (April 20, 2009)
- A plan for better advising (April 20, 2009)
Over the past year, the University of Wisconsin has received a considerable amount of bad press. From the UW's reputation as the number one party school to its lack of diversity, criticism of the university is the highest it has been in recent memory. State legislators, alumni and Wisconsin residents only see and hear about the UW's shortcomings. However, lost among all of the negative media coverage are the students themselves and the extraordinary efforts they are making to correct these stereotypes.
Each spring, the Wisconsin Alumni Student Board (WASB) and the Wisconsin Alumni Association
2 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Fans of Waits will not be disappointed
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
SPRING SUBLET: 1 bedroom in 2 bedroom at the Aberdeen. Rent negotiable. Email arkramer@wisc.edu
GENTLE WOMEN...THROUGH the lens of Douglas J. Nesbit, newly released book now available for holiday gifts! www.gentlewomen.us



As an alumnus (64, 66,70), joining other alumni in the struggle to make sense of this the very public battle on the Madison Campus, I was enriched by your editorial entitled "Vindicated" in the April 18 issue of the Badger Herald. Your editorial board sharpened the focus and improved our understanding on the facts surrounding the unfortunate plight of Dr. Paul Barrows. In doing so you revealed the underbelly of dysfunction in the UW governance process which allowed prejudicial views, which may well be race-based, to creep into professional judgments without allowing the accused to respond. The highlights of the Academic Staff deliberations, revelations and vote placed the spotlight upon the diminished credibility and integrity of Chancellor and his representatives. Governance appeared tainted by the now unmasked efforts to protect reputations at the expense of Mr. Barrows and all in the name of justice and fairness. It would have been prudent if the campus leadership, with an obvious conflict of interest, had referred the matter to an independent body outside the scope of perceived influence by the power brokers on campus.
One expects that the decision of the Academic Staff, the emerging facts and your editorial will encourage the Campus and the System leadership to work together to find a remedy to this very public evisceration of a campus administrator of color. This situation has created a climate of doubt about the University's commitment to cultivating a positive climate for persons of color and in so doing tarnished its reputation. Urgent, timely and constructive actions are called for. We who have been a part of this wonderful world-class institution expect the leadership to embrace and reaffirm its commitment to a history of fairness in the conduct of its business. A friendly reminder: The often referenced "Sifting and winnowing" of this splendid University applies to institutional leadership as well as to academic life.
Hamilton I. McCubbin Ph.D.
President and CEO
Pacific American Foundation
I'm just curious... Who thinks the party school ranking is bad press? If it coincided with a drop in national academic rank, I could see it, but that isn't what is happening. By the way, SI consistently rates us near the top of the country in combined spectator sports and opportunities to be involved in athletics for non-varsity athlete students. Essentially what the rankings, all put together, are saying is: We are one of the best public schools in the country. Beyond that, we have the best time of any school in the country.