The Badger Herald

OPINION & EDITORIAL

An ASM anomaly

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Badger Herald Editorial Board:

A security fee-for-all (December 11, 2007)
Farewell, Chancellor (December 10, 2007)
$$FC (December 6, 2007)
In a bind (December 5, 2007)
Entitlement Town (December 4, 2007)

by Badger Herald Editorial Board

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

The Associated Students of Madison's recent election conundrum left it with few options for self-extrication from a rather deep hole. Possible means of redressing the electoral situation ranged, quite frankly, from bad to terrible.

Surprisingly, ASM managed to navigate this Scylla and Charybdis in the best manner possible.

Undoubtedly, the Student Judiciary's decision to move the referendum portion of the ASM spring election to next fall's ballot is imperfect. Campus issues of great importance to the university's future will be decided more than six months after their initial appearance on the ballot. While they probably won't care all that much, graduating seniors seem to have been prevented from voting on referendums they otherwise would have legally influenced. ASM, as we have previously pointed out, cannot possibly emerge from the spring-election turmoil completely unscathed.

However, given ASM's less-than-stellar alternatives of either: a) condoning election results fraught with errors, confusion and questions of impropriety; or b) violating its own constitution to hold yet another makeup election, the Student Judiciary's Sunday night decision appears to represent the least harmful of all possible options. Considering ASM's track record, our commendation comes as a surprise even to us.

With all the manure currently on the highway, though, we must stop a moment to applaud ASM for finally picking up the shovel and doing the right thing. After multiple noxious spills, there's still a long way to go before the highway is cleaned up. But the postponement of the election to next fall semester should buy some time. Allowing an election with at least 436 erroneous online ballots to stand as official would have constituted a travesty for students whose right to the franchise should be safeguarded with utmost care.

The reaction of other key campus parties to this development remains to be seen. Whether they seize the election delay as an opportunity to advance their own causes or waver in the face of a positive step by the target of their criticism will do much to determine the future course of student-body government on campus.

We thank the ASM Student Judiciary for inserting a modicum of reason into the chaos plaguing this year's spring-election marathon. Unfortunately, the court's decision looks like an anomaly in the context of the past 10 years.

We wish all students the best of luck today as they face another round of voting on ASM candidates at the polling places around campus. We hope this latest electoral episode — jury-rigged and questionable as it is — will be marked by fewer irregularities and errors than earlier incarnations.

We aren't, however, holding our breath.

Feedback

Show all comments

Hide anonymous comments

Anonymous (April 11, 2006 @ 8:16am):

Mac, you don't care about democracy or ASM's image, you just want the living wage to fail.

Anonymous (April 11, 2006 @ 8:21am):

i whole-heartedly agree with this article. asm has sucked it up the entire election process...but they chose the lesser of the 3 evils. i feel bad for everyone who's been working on their campaigns as candidates and i also hope that someone slaps SLAC in the face. i voted down the union referendum last year but i supported it this year and will continue to support it. as a graduate student, i barely use the union but they have shown extreme measures of getting their information out to on campus and only the facts. i admire that they are saying vote informed rather than saying "i'll tell you how to vote." because of the way the union handled themselves throughout the campaign and election process, they can count on my vote again in the fall.