The Badger Herald

OPINION & EDITORIAL

War referendum inappropriate

Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.

Also by Joelle Parks:

Affirmative action has no place at collegiate level (April 13, 2006)
Local media expedite petty politics (November 29, 2006)
Campus safety needs high priority (November 21, 2005)
Obese must admit own fault (April 20, 2006)
Board of Regents' new disciplinary policy overdue, welcome (December 13, 2006)

by Joelle Parks

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Although the April 4 elections in Wisconsin were originally intended to determine new County Board officials, this year a small, additional vote has snuck its way onto the ballot. The Troops Home Now referendum asks voters for their opinion on the war in Iraq, regardless of the fact that it does not hold any sort of legal weight whatsoever. Rather, it appears as nothing more than a ploy for anti-war voters to show their displeasure by the actions of the current administration.

The war has accomplished more than some citizens have given it credit for, including eliminating a dictator, putting him on trial and overseeing three democratic elections. We cannot just pull troops out during the phase of reconstruction that is most crucial for the continued development of a new Iraqi government. Even though the United States has succeeded in training the military, they do not have enough experience to take on higher-ranked positions as leaders. Even Congress seems content leaving the troops for now. Nov. 11, 2005, John Murtha, D-Pa., called for a withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. The U.S. House of Representatives voted against it almost unanimously, 403 to 3. This resolution was very similar to the referendum that Wisconsin is facing and will hopefully have the same end result.

The referendum is not a matter of the draft or anything of its kind. The men and women of the United States that are in Iraq are there because of their chosen profession and desire to protect American ideals. These people are fighting for freedom — something that the United States is supposed to protect and value; yet something many are taking for granted. Support of the troops depends on the support of the war. Placing the Troops Home Now referendum on the ballot further discourages them and creates further separation among Americans who vary in opinion on the war.

Freedom is the most valuable commodity that exists. Consider those who are protecting it; they are doing so by choice. It is their duty to protect the United States and show foreign individuals what the United States is and what it stands for. April 4, is more than just another election — it is the chance to show U.S. troops that the people of Wisconsin are behind them and appreciate their efforts. Maybe other states should add a referendum to their ballots called the Support our Troops referendum to show them that the United States cares.

Joelle Parks (jparks@badgerherald.com) is a sophomore intending to major in journalism.

Feedback

Show all comments

Hide anonymous comments

Anonymous (March 30, 2006 @ 2:13am):

Joelle misses a fundamental argument. You can concede EVERYTHING she says but that still does not mean there is not a right for the referendum to take place. The law states you need "x" amount of signatures and they got it. You can use the same legal technique for placing say... an amendment to ban marriage... of some sort.... on the ballot. Hmm.

Anonymous (March 30, 2006 @ 7:37am):

Everyone's knee-jerk reaction is to say, "I don't support the war, but I support the troops." In order to support the troops, don't we have to understand what they're doing first? If they're just acting as referees in a civil war, I would rather have them come home OR return to their mission of fighting terror by finding Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

One minute you applaud Iraq for having three free elections, and then next minute you denouce your own free elections for asking the opinion of the people. Which way is it? Should Iraq be more free than your own country?

The President, Congress, and the military work for the people; we don't work for them. Like an employer should, promote those who are deserving and demote those who aren't.

Anonymous (March 30, 2006 @ 10:04am):

>>it appears as nothing more than a ploy for anti-war voters to show their displeasure by the actions of the current administration<<

Just so you know, we're still allowed to do this. Even if it wont accomplish anything, there's nothing wrong with letting your elected leaders know what you think, throught the wonderful democratic process you seem to love. As long as the referendum is legally done, I don't see why you'd argue against it. Aren't we supposed to have freedom here too?

Anonymous (March 30, 2006 @ 4:45pm):

Very naive opinion here. We have had success in Iraq? Are we safer as Americans now with a country ripe for terrorist breeding and instability than we were when Sadam was in power? Do you really think we have succeeded in training Iraq's military? Are you afiliated with Bill O'Reilly?

And how can you say the soldiers are doing their "chosen profession?" That is absurd. Do your research of whom our army is comprised.

Anonymous (March 30, 2006 @ 5:25pm):

"I would rather have them come home OR return to their mission of fighting terror by finding Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

Excellent point. If we didn't waste our time invading Iraq, we could've caught Osama bin Laden by now. Thanks to a bunch of idiots running the show, INCLUDING BUSH, we probably never will.