OPINION & EDITORIAL
Herald editorial board rushes to conclusion
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- SSFC stipend appropriate (December 11, 2007)
- Poor plowing cuts off handicapped access (December 10, 2007)
- Cars that actually help the environment (December 10, 2007)
- Organic food: Deliciously safe (December 10, 2007)
- Diversity deserves attention at UW (December 7, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Setting the record straight (March 7, 2005)
- Editorial board drops ball (March 9, 2006)
- Herald unleashed childish attack on Kumar (December 8, 2005)
- Herald editorial board mischaracterizes UC position (November 8, 2001)
- Letter to editor policy fatally flawed (March 23, 2006)
by Letters to the Editor
Monday, February 20, 2006
I urge The Badger Herald Editorial Board members to re-read the termination proposal they wrote about Feb. 15. Even a cursory reading reveals that the policy easily could be used to circumvent the constitutional rights of faculty.
Your editorial, like the proposal itself, represents a rush to judgment in response to political posturing that creates the perception that the UW System is wasting tremendous amounts of money by paying criminals. If the policy is adopted, the System will be spending a lot more money settling lawsuits for such offenses as unlawful termination and depriving persons of their civil rights.
Re-read the policy and ask yourself: As a student, would I want to be expelled from the university if someone came forward with "credible information" that I had committed a serious crime? You would not have to be convicted in a court of law or even charged with a crime if you were subject to this policy. You could simply be dismissed based on an investigation by someone whose qualifications are not even spelled out in the policy.
As a student, you might not pay a tremendously high price — that is, if you don't mind moving to another state and starting your college career again. For a professor, such a dismissal would be the end of a career. Professors typically follow 10 years of higher education with seven years of full-time teaching to reach tenure. The proposal could wipe that 17-year effort out based on nothing more than an allegation.
The System's policy might be flawed, but the proposal, if adopted, would make matters worse, not better.
Arthur L. Ranney, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Communication Technologies University of Wisconsin-Platteville
