Um... Ms. Turner, you didn't answer the question raised by the title to you article. Who are they labelling as eco-terrorists? Are they labelling people who throw red paint on people who wear fur? I'd believe that would be more an eco-vandal, and definitely not an eco-terrorist. Are they trying to severely damage research facilities that do animal research or oil companies to prevent drilling in Alaska, risking human life and severe property damage in the process? That would be eco-terrorism. So what did these people do? And just because people aren't as bad as Osama doesn't mean they aren't terrorists.

The real terrorists are corporations who pollute our air and water, kill off species of flora and fauna because they aren't profitable, rape and pillage the land, all the while using working class Americans to do their bidding, only to exploit them and then leave them and their families with nothing, and the politicians who not only allow this behavior to continue, but encourage it by loosening environmental standards, handing land out for free to their buddies, and even give them tax credits.

This is the real eco-terrorism. How many people must die from man-made pollution, how many inner-city children must get asthma, how many people must be malnurished because their sole supply of drinking water is polluted? How many dead lakes, abandoned mines, and cleared forests must there be? The American government-sponsored corporation "risks human life and severe property damage" every single day.