Opinion
America turns blind eye to Darfur
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Paul Temple:
- Stop genocide in Darfur (April 28, 2005)
- America turns blind eye to Darfur (December 5, 2005)
- Examining The Badger Herald from outside (January 26, 2006)
- Newspapers must take extreme care in dealing with victim identity (February 2, 2006)
- Editorial on Covenant plan inadequately researched (February 9, 2006)
Sharing tools:
E-mail this article:
"Even before the shooting began, First Lieutenant Gnade had personally picked out some twenty to twenty-five elderly Jews. They were exclusively men with full beards. Gnade made the men crawl on the ground in the area before the grave.
"Before he gave them the order to crawl, they had to undress. While the totally naked Jews crawled, First Lieutenant Gnade screamed to those around, 'Where are my non-commissioned officers? Don't you have any clubs yet?'
"The non-commissioned officers went to the edge of the forest, fetched themselves clubs, and vigorously beat the Jews with them." The officers then shot and buried the rest of the Jews in a mass grave.
These words, found in the book Ordinary Men by Christopher Browning, is required reading in a history course taught right here at the University of Wisconsin. It includes first-hand accounts, like the one above, of the atrocities carried out by Reserve Police Battalion 101 in Nazi-occupied Poland. The men were, as Browning describes them, ordinary people committing extraordinary acts of violence.
But the hard-fought victory over that genocide is now forgotten, by leaders and citizens alike. We have forsaken our forefathers' oath that the "Final Solution" never happens again.
Today, the atrocities of Poland are repeating — in a place called Darfur. And instead of Jews, native black Africans are facing the slaughter.
In the past two years, militias backed by the Sudanese government controlling Darfur have killed hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women, and children in the region. Women and girls, if not killed, are gang-raped. Millions have become refugees. Why? Because they are members of black African tribes.
The situation is deteriorating. The few aid groups in the area, backed by a handful of troops from the African Union — a coalition force from neighboring African countries — may soon leave after workers and troops were recently kidnapped by the militias. According to the U.N., deaths could reach 100,000 a month if the troops and workers are forced to pull out.
Our government — with a military already stretched thin and a populace growing increasingly weary of military intervention — has only made it worse. Congress has cut the $50 million originally earmarked to help pay for peacekeepers. Meanwhile, the Administration has said nothing about it. And while the Senate has passed the Darfur Accountability Act, which might impose sanctions against Sudan, the House is reluctant to take action on the bill.
But for those of us willing to do something, there is a first step.
Action in Sudan!, a student group here at the UW, is working with state Rep. Fred Kessler (D-Milwaukee) to introduce legislation that would end state-funded investments in companies conducting business with Sudan. Illinois, New Jersey and Oregon have already passed similar legislation, and at least seven others are considering it. This might not seem like much, but it is of the few actions our state government could take to positively and substantively affect the crisis.
Fortunately for the group, several legislators have already shown an interest in human rights. While only Kessler has directly supported the divestment legislation, others — from conservative state Senator Alan Lasee (R-De Pere) to liberal state Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Madison) — have co-sponsored legislation against human trafficking. Thus, Action in Sudan! hopes their future lobbying efforts may prove successful.
But others are less interested. Specifically, one state representative said, "Genocide is bad, but people losing jobs in my district is worse."
It's precisely that mentality which must change if this genocide will ever end. If we think only of ourselves, history will look upon us no differently than we now look upon the non-commissioned officers of Battalion 101.
That's where we come in. Write letters to your state legislators and tell them to support the divestment bill. Write your Congressmen and tell them to fund a real peacekeeping effort in Sudan. And above all, get educated. Tonight, Action in Sudan! will host a lecture by Smith College Prof. Eric Reeves at 7 p.m. in 3650 Humanities. He's an expert on Darfur. Go there and learn what we can do to stop the killing.
As Reeves has written, "It is immoral to own shares in companies that now willingly engage in commerce with a regime that is guilty of ongoing genocide… However high the threshold might be for divestment — what will inevitably be labeled by some as the 'politicization of investment decisions' — genocide must surely cross it."
Ordinary people can commit horrendous acts of violence. But we can also prevent it. Take action.
Paul Temple (patemple@gmail.com) is the former editorial page editor of the Badger Herald.
5 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Brother Ali makes an ‘Exclusive’ stop
Muckrakers
Report: Barrett to make decision by the end of the week
Extra Points
Top Classified Ads (view all)
HOUSES FOR Fall 2010. All houses are on W Dayton or N Bassett. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 bedrooms. All have parking. madisoncampusrentals.com
"Genocide is bad, but people losing jobs in my district is worse." -- Some elected member of the Wisconsin Assembly.
If someone really said this, why did you hide his/her identity?
How many nation-building operations are the many countries of Europe involved heavily in right now? How many hurricanes did they have this year?
But no, it's our fault when we invade countries to make a difference, and it's our fault if we don't. "Peacekeepers" aren't the answer to this problem either, a full-scale military intervention is.
Why does the UN even exist if they can't deal with this sort of problem?
The US should indeed contribute to ending this horrible genocide, but we are, like you said, stretched thin. Some other country which has less on their plate at the moment needs to take the lead on this.
The root of the problem in Darfur: Chinese oil money and weapons transfers that support the Sudanese government.
http://www.sudantribune.com/article.php3?id_article=7165
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/sudan1103/26.htm
Brad Vogel
I wanted to take a chance to respond to two comments.
With regards to the comment on the state legislator, I did not feel it was fair to quote the rep. directly without giving that person an opportunity to respond. I was unable to reach the representative, though multiple sources verified that the individual did, in fact, say it during a meeting. In the end, we chose not to disclose the identity. Had I been able to reach that legislator and ask for the explanation, I would have included the name with comment.
With regards to Brad Vogel's comments, he's correct in saying that Chinese oil money is one of the major sources of funds for the Sudanese government. The sad part, in my opinion, is that some of those companies are publicly owned and traded on the U.S. & European markets. And some of those stockholders are state / national governments' pension funds.
"With regards to the comment on the state legislator, I did not feel it was fair to quote the rep. directly without giving that person an opportunity to respond."
Whoever this representative is, I'm sure he's already had every opportunity to respond. Go ahead and give us his name.