OPINION & EDITORIAL
State should allow cabbies to carry
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Casey Hoff:
- State should allow cabbies to carry (November 22, 2005)
- Don't pass go, don't collect $200 (April 18, 2005)
- Lawmakers twist Avery case for political, personal ends (November 29, 2005)
- Left-wing, right-wing out of bounds with war rhetoric (April 25, 2005)
- Residents, police need to work together (December 6, 2005)
Related Stories:
- Residents, police need to work together (December 6, 2005)
- Socialist cabs (May 7, 2002)
- LTE: Gun control not as popular in Wisconsin (December 1, 2005)
- Green-light immigrants (February 28, 2005)
- Shifting gears (October 12, 2005)
by Casey Hoff
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
"Give me all of your f*cking money or I'll blow your head off."
Madison cab drivers have heard something to that effect on five occasions since Nov. 3 alone in this city. It is no joke. Most of the death threats have occurred near Allied Drive.
Many cab drivers are deeply concerned. Badger Cab owner Tom Royston remembers an awful incident from 1992, when one of his cab drivers was murdered on the job by taking a gunshot to the back of the head from a robber. When asked if recent events scared him, Royston's shaky voice lamented: "We lost a driver about 13 years ago, so yeah."
Wisconsin, still one of just four states left in the country that does not allow citizens to carry concealed weapons, is expected to thankfully acknowledge the Second Amendment through legislation set to pass very soon. But predictably, the self-proclaimed "lefty's lefty", Ald. Austin King and Ald. Brenda Konkel, are visibly upset.
King went to the blue-collar town of Racine last week to take an unusual stand for fiscal responsibility. The budget hawk told a crowd that included his green party supporters: "There is an irony of having to take police officers off the street and away from protecting us so that we can hire people to stand at building entrances and check for weapons." It's funny, that's also the first time I've ever heard the anti-police state King talk about tough police enforcement.
Ald. Brenda Konkel also showed rare spending constraint by fear mongering about the costs that concealed carry would bring for weapons screening. She even proposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in new spending for the 2006 fiscal budget during City Council debates last week, but later removed the proposal, admitting that it was actually just a symbolic gesture to get a discussion going. In other words, Konkel was just grandstanding and being disingenuous.
Despite FBI statistics which show that states with concealed carry legislation actually see substantial reductions in violent crime and that there really is no Wild West gun battle that emerges, people like King and Konkel will always be happy to fear monger through trite speech and decades-old clichés. It's kind of like when whining children don't get their way. They often lash out with irrational cries. But I digress.
Cab drivers should have the right to defend themselves by carrying a gun. Unlike a pizza delivery guy, cabbies cannot refuse a call in any area of the city because of a quasi city-regulated rule. For instance, if a cabbie gets a call from someone on Allied Drive, he has to go there. If he does not, he will probably be fired. This rule is in place for good reason, in my opinion. As a society, the majority of residents have concluded that to deny someone a cab ride based on a "shady" location is morally wrong. Agree with that or not, that's just the way it is and it's not changing anytime soon.
When we send people into dangerous areas, we usually equip them with a weapon. Police officers, military personnel, and air marshals all have guns to protect themselves for good reason. Cab drivers should at least have that option available to them.
King would have you believe that the only people who support the right to concealed carry are "crazy" right-wing Republicans. That's simply not true. As someone who voted for John Kerry, has never owned a gun, and considers himself an Independent, I can tell you King's notion is beyond ridiculous.
For example, Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold has an impressive record on Second Amendment rights. As a state senator, he was the original author of a 1998 amendment to the Wisconsin state constitution to include the right to bear arms. The amendment was supported by around 70 percent of Wisconsinites. Feingold also wrote his college thesis on the importance of the Second Amendment, and has voted against the Orwellian cosmetically based "Assault Weapons Ban".
The "anti-gun nuts" are always making it seem like concealed carry is going to turn this state into post-Iraq War Fallujah (despite empirical evidence in 46 other states that point to the exact opposite). Under that flawed assumption, we should essentially be a near utopia right now in terms of gun violence! The reality is that criminals always have and always will carry guns. Not having concealed carry punishes law-abiding citizens of the right to carry.
Until Austin King has a gun pointed at his head, he probably won't appreciate that whole nutty "right to protect yourself" idea. I hope that never happens to the lefty's lefty. For the rest of us Wisconsinites, the crazy notion of carrying a gun will soon most likely become a sane reality.
Casey Hoff (choff@badgerherald.com) is a University of Wisconsin student and host of "New Ground with Casey Hoff," live Monday through Friday, 9-11 a.m., on Madison 1670 The Pulse
Anonymous (November 22, 2005 @ 1:39pm):
You are an idiot
Anonymous (November 22, 2005 @ 9:37pm):
this article is a joke right? oh you mean you were actually trying to take a position on something? hmm, you should stick to writing about fluffy bunny rabbits and stuff of that nature, you are an idiot, neither side of the debate is well served by the crap you write
Anonymous (November 23, 2005 @ 2:20pm):
What a well-stated and balanced opinion! I live in gun-friendly New Hampshire. When is the last time you heard about a crime spree out here? How about our next-door (generally liberal Democrats) neighbors in Vermont, where any law abiding citizen can carry concealed without any permit? Heard about violent crimes there lately?
And then to our south is anti-gun Massachusetts, with Boston having 6917 violent crimes in 2004. How many could have been avoided if the victim's civil rights, that is, the right to keep and bear arms, had been allowed?
Dave in NH
Anonymous (November 24, 2005 @ 7:45am):
Casey, Thanks for the very well written article. We all have the right to be our own first responders. Gov. Doyle also believes in having personal protection, he just farms his out to taxpayer provided State Troopers! Yet, he denies the average citizen their civil rights by his opposition to this common sense legislation that has proven to reduce violent crime in the 46 states that allow their citizens to carry firearms. Come to a concealed carry class in Madison on 12-12-05. Contact Gene German at ccwtrainer@directway.com to register.
Jim Burgess
Anonymous (November 24, 2005 @ 8:24am):
I put in the wrong email address for Gene German, please correct to: ccwtrainer@direcway.com
Thanks!
Jim Burgess
Anonymous (November 24, 2005 @ 11:33am):
DEAR SIR.
WISCONSIN, HAS ALWAYS BEEN A BACKWARD STATE. I SEE NO CHANGE COMMING. TO THIS DARYLAND STATE. THEIR IS JUST TO MANY PEOPLE THAT DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THE CITY LIFE CAN BE. IT IS LIKE DAN FURBY SAID IT IS BETTER TO HAVE A GUN IN YOUR HAND THAN A COP ON THE PHONE.HE WAS A MESA, AZ CITY POLICEMAN FOR 21 YEARS. I BELIEVE THAT TO BE TRUE. YOU CANNOT SUE POLICE FOR NOT BEING THERE TO PROTECT YOU. SO HAVE A GREAT DAY. JUST REMEMBER WHAT I TOLD YOU.
BILL BURNS
