Skyrocketing tuition hurts class selection
Looking for a print version?
Simply use your browser’s ‘Print’ command and a printer-friendly document will be generated automatically.
Also by Julia Fieldbinder:
- Concealed-carry misunderstood (February 6, 2006)
- Enough is too much for party school (November 2, 2005)
- Fieldbinder - Abstinence-only education lacking (December 2, 2005)
by Julia Fieldbinder
Friday, November 18, 2005 00:00
With tuition costs constantly on the rise, many students worry that there's no end in sight. Various solutions to the ever-increasing cost of higher education have been proposed, but none seem viable.
State spending on higher education cannot in itself fix the problem, as deficits manipulate annual budgets and the money available is limited. Some universities are trying to reduce costs by laying off faculty and implementing pay freezes. Although these solutions are meant to help students by lowering costs, they raise questions regarding the quality of education.
With enrollment rates at their highest, more professors than ever are needed. If their workload increases and their salary does not, they're going to begin to look elsewhere for work. Professors at public universities already earn less than those at private schools, and professors here at UW earn less than many professors at other public universities. Other schools already know that UW-Madison faculty salaries have fallen to 7.3 percent behind the median salary of faculty at other public peer institutions. These institutions are aware of this and are pursuing faculty here, so if this becomes an issue, professors will simply leave.
With fewer professors available to teach, departments have fewer resources to offer students. In fall 2004, the University of Wisconsin offered 300 fewer courses and increased its class sizes. With enrollment rates up and fewer courses available, the option of graduating in four years becomes less feasible. Students may have to stay in school longer just to get the courses they need to earn their degree, which defeats the purpose of implementing these changes to begin with.
It is obvious that public schools are not exactly "public" anymore. Due to rising costs, higher education is not an option for everyone, yet there are more high school seniors pursuing a college education than ever before. Most know that an increase in demand leads to higher prices, so could a potential solution lie in the question of how to control this demand?
Is it possible that we have exceeded the level of college participation as a society? With high drop-out rates among first-year students and few students finishing in four years, it becomes questionable whether everyone is well prepared or dedicated to undertaking the rigorous curriculum encountered in the university environment. Would making admissions criteria stricter solve this enduring problem?
There may be no single solution to this problem, but upon examination it becomes clear that some changes need to be made — and soon — to ensure that the costs of higher education do not continue to spiral out of control.
Julia Fieldbinder (jfieldbinder@wisc.edu) is a senior majoring in communication arts.
Feedback
Anonymous (November 18, 2005 @ 4:07am):
I think this is a great article, and I commend the autho for writing it. I think there needs to be more discussion on this campus about the quality of education we are receiving here at UW-Madison. Students need to be cognizant of the fact that tuition increases in large part due to the state's ability to fund UW.
Anonymous (November 21, 2005 @ 1:06am):
Why not cut more faculty and reduce the availablity of light programs that do not require students to perform at a high level. Eliminate the number of useless classes that students in Business, Engineering, Computer Science etc. have to take. Allow them to focus on what they need instead of trying to indoctrinate them to a leftist ideology that most of them dispise but put up with because they have no other choice.
How many Psych 101 classes could be cut? Not to mention Women Studies, Ethnic Studies or Ethics courses that would reduce the need for faculty in those areas and increase the faculty to student contact at the same time. No longer would a professor have 150 students in a class with 140 of them wishing they never had to listen to the annoying battering ram of ideology passed off as science. Victomology debunked but still alive and well in Womens studies as an example.
As for an Alumni who is not fond of the political evironmnet at the UW, I say raise the tuition through the roof and make it harder for the permanent UW Green anti-globilazation student from using ASM to pay the bills for 10 years.
Herald Blogs
The Beat Goes On
Muckrakers
The Passion of C-FACT, or ‘What Happens When You Lose Your Papers’
Extra Points
Football recruiting: Two under-the-radar prospects commit
Simply Sumptuous
Development Weblog
Top Classified Ads (view all)
Place your classified ad online and have it show up here. Your ad will hit thousands of viewers a day!
DON'T READ ME! Too late. If you're reading this, guess how many other people are reading it. See... advertising in The Badger Herald does work!


