OPINION & EDITORIAL
Evangelicals hold unprecedented influence over Bush White House
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Rob Rossmeissl:
- Trolley proposal deserves thought (May 1, 2007)
- U.S. should re-evaluate free trade agreements to improve economy (April 24, 2007)
- High quality city inspires progress (April 17, 2007)
- Comic relief important in movies (April 9, 2007)
- Shout outs harbor hatred (March 26, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Religion, morality should be separated (December 5, 2007)
- Forgetting the festivities? (October 20, 2006)
- Prosecutor tarnishes Libby, justice system (March 8, 2007)
- Bickerstaff turns 12, ahem, 21 (July 25, 2001)
- Inequality looms over Wisconsin (September 16, 2005)
by Rob Rossmeissl
Monday, October 3, 2005
Sometimes one has to seriously wonder whether the religious right is playing a game to see who can get away with saying the craziest thing. Last week, William J. Bennett, a poster boy of the "moral majority," claimed that "you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down." Mr. Bennett, author of "The Moral Compass" and "The Book of Virtues," quickly pointed out that he, of course, would never advocate such an extreme measure.
Although Mr. Bennett's comment should not even be given the dignity of a public outcry, perhaps it ought to be considered simply because of its relevance to American politics.
Despite its obligatory disapproval of William J. Bennett's recent comments, the Bush administration is undoubtedly linked to the religious icon. Not only was Mr. Bennett the secretary of education in the Reagan administration, but he also served as the drug czar in the first Bush administration and has well-established ties to the Bush family.
While the association between President George W. Bush and a man considering genocide is certainly disturbing, a more worrisome prospect is the religious right's general impact on Bush administration policy. By allowing a radical cultural sect unprecedented influence on governmental affairs, the United States is following a dangerous course.
In the run-up to his first campaign for the presidency, George W. Bush proclaimed, "I feel like God wants me to run for president." Since Bush's victory in 2000, it seems like God has become an integral part of every decision made by the Bush administration, from the invasion of Iraq to the U.S. exclusion from the Kyoto Protocol.
With radical Christians filling important positions — not to mention the president's own relationship with Jesus — few would doubt the influence of outside evangelicals on the Bush administration. When John Ashcroft says, "[Americans] have no king but Jesus," it is hard to believe that the religious right does not have direct access to the White House.
Regardless of the extent to which Bush administration policy is being dictated by the religious right, leaders of the movement are certainly not timid about giving their advice on politics. Recently, Pat Robertson essentially called for the assassination of Venezuela's president, noting, as a good Christian would, that such action would likely not interrupt the supply of oil from Venezuela to the United States. Perhaps their most outlandish advice is ignored, but the very thought that radical members of the religious right have any influence whatsoever on the Bush administration is nauseating.
Conservative Christians have unquestionably played a key role in President Bush's electoral success. Nonetheless, however obligated the Bush administration is to satisfy the desires of this core support base, it cannot simply disregard common sense. Unfortunately, with its "faith-based initiatives," uncertainty about evolution, and opposition to embryonic stem cell research, that is exactly what the administration has done.
Not many people can remember a time when the line separating church and state was as blurred as it is now. The Bush administration has become so reliant on its Christian support that religion has come to play a role in nearly every decision made by the president.
Americans deserve a government that acts rationally and makes sound decisions based on common knowledge. By constantly appeasing the religious right, President Bush is dictating the future of the United States according to advice from a small group of radical evangelicals.
Regrettably, it is likely that William J. Bennett will come out of his controversy unscathed; and if current trends continue, expect him to be advising the president soon.
Rob Rossmeissl (rjrossmeissl@wisc.edu) is a junior majoring in political science.
Anonymous (October 3, 2005 @ 10:08am):
I'll bet Williams wishes he had said "white boys", that would have been the PC thing to say.
Maybe he should have suggested eating the fetuses to alleviate hunger in the hood, ala Swift's advice on the Irish famine (although he advocated using born instead of unborn children)?
"I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled ..."
Anonymous (October 3, 2005 @ 10:15am):
My only consolation is that the Conservative Christians in the White House have yet to call for imposing the death penalty on blasphemers and apostates, unlike Conservative Moslems the world over.
Jeremy Wick (October 3, 2005 @ 11:36am):
Rob, seriously, do some research, watch some news. Bill Bennett did NOT consider genocide, and certainly was nowhere near condoning it. He said it himself, "the concept would be morally reprehensible." There was even a debate between two black pundits on Hannity & Colmes the same day he made the comments. Take off your political polarizers and read the news from both sides before you pass judgment...
Anonymous (October 3, 2005 @ 5:21pm):
"There was even a debate between two black pundits on Hannity & Colmes..."
Right there, you lose.
Anonymous (October 3, 2005 @ 9:54pm):
Yeah, leave Hitler alone. There was even a debate between two Jews on state television during the Holocaust.
Anonymous (October 10, 2005 @ 9:09am):
"Yeah, leave Hitler alone. There was even a debate between two Jews on state television during the Holocaust."
How the hell did this bullshit get through the censor? You won't let criticism of your columnists get through, but you let someone compliment Hitler? How stupid are you?
