OPINION & EDITORIAL
Coverage shows lack of understanding
Looking for a print version?
Simply choose ‘Print’ on your computer and a printer-friendly document will be generated.
Also by Letters to the Editor:
- SSFC stipend appropriate (December 11, 2007)
- Poor plowing cuts off handicapped access (December 10, 2007)
- Cars that actually help the environment (December 10, 2007)
- Organic food: Deliciously safe (December 10, 2007)
- Diversity deserves attention at UW (December 7, 2007)
Related Stories:
- Help wanted (September 20, 2005)
- Check them out (November 9, 2006)
- Board of Regents' new disciplinary policy overdue, welcome (December 13, 2006)
- Editorial Board wrong on unions (February 1, 2006)
- Editorial: Improving our faculty (March 8, 2006)
by Letters to the Editor
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
Your recent coverage and editorial on the lack of background checks on UW faculty indicates a lack of "background checks."
First of all, based on what I have heard, department chair is not a "promotion" but a necessary evil and is essentially an administrative position that is handed from faculty member to faculty member as a sort of hot potato.
Second, arrest-and-conviction records alone are insufficient for refusing to hire someone in Wisconsin. State law recognizes the fact that those convicted of a crime — or even accused of a crime that is later thrown out — do need to work and live somewhere, and that stability in employment is a key part of rehabilitation.
If a prospective employer asks about a criminal record and the candidate is subsequently not hired, there are grounds for a discrimination complaint unless the employer can show the conviction is substantially related to the job duties or prevents performance of those duties (e.g., jobs that require bonding and working with children, the disabled or elderly).
Finally, I don't understand the claims by Scott Suder that "The UW seems to think that, for some reason, they are above the law." Suder's very comments indicate he himself is either above the law or does not understand it. Does he think that everyone listed in conviction-data systems should be ineligible for employment at UW? They list traffic tickets and divorces, too.
And should all felons be banned from using the library or from attending class even in a student role? Until the U.S. Supreme Court case overturning sodomy laws, a consensual act between adults of the same sex was a felony in Idaho and Michigan. And, in Wisconsin, adultery remains a felony.
Dan Ross
Special Student
Anonymous (September 21, 2005 @ 9:54am):
"And, in Wisconsin, adultery remains a felony."
Current legal system = laws againt almost everything and abitrary enforcement



